Organ-sparing treatment in synchronous bilateral upper tract urothelial carcinoma and bladder cancer
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2026-14-4-99-106
Abstract
Introduction. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy associated with high rates of recurrence, diagnostic and staging challenges, and a substantial risk of implantation metastasis. In patients with bilateral or multifocal disease, standard radical nephroureterectomy results in loss of renal function, thereby limiting options for systemic therapy and adversely affecting quality of life. Current clinical guidelines increasingly support organ-preserving endoscopic approaches in carefully selected patients. We present a case illustrating successful stepwise organ-preserving management (laser excision, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant immunotherapy) in a patient with metachronous primary multifocal urothelial carcinoma.
Case presentation. A 62-year-old man with a long history of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer and recurrent disease despite multiple transurethral resections and intravesical therapy was found to have bilateral upper urinary tract involvement. He underwent ureteropyeloscopy with laser multifocal excision of tumors from the left renal pelvis and left ureter (Ta, low grade) and transurethral resection of the bladder. Four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin were administered for invasive urothelial carcinoma of the right renal pelvis (cT2N0M0). A partial response was achieved according to RECIST v1.1 (tumor size reduction 39–58%). Subsequently, laparoscopic right nephroureterectomy with paracaval lymphadenectomy and resection of the right ureteral orifice was performed. Histopathological examination revealed invasive high-grade urothelial carcinoma pT2N0, tumor regression grade 3 (indicating a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy). The estimated glomerular filtration rate after completion of all procedures decreased to 58 mL/min/1.73 m². Adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab was initiated.
Conclusion. This case demonstrates that, even in the setting of an incomplete pathomorphological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a comprehensive strategy that preserves the function of the remaining kidney can achieve oncologic radicality, enable adjuvant immunotherapy, and prevent dialysis dependence. Organ-preserving interventions for UTUC should be considered in specialized centers within a multidisciplinary framework.
About the Authors
I. Ya. SkvortsovRussian Federation
Igor Ya. Skvortsov — Cand.Sc.(Med)
Moscow
Competing Interests:
Автор статьи Всеволод Борисович Матвеев является членом редакционной коллегии журнала «Вестник урологии». Статья прошла принятую в журнале процедуру рецензирования независимыми экспертами. Об иных конфликтах интересов авторы не заявляли.
E. M. Nikolaeva
Russian Federation
Ekaterina M. Nikolaeva
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The author of this article, Vsevolod B. Matveev, is a member of the Editorial Board of the journal Urology Herald. The article underwent the journal's established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest
V. B. Matveev
Russian Federation
Vsevolod B. Matveev — Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof., Acad. the RAS
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The author of this article, Vsevolod B. Matveev, is a member of the Editorial Board of the journal Urology Herald. The article underwent the journal's established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest
E. R. Virshke
Russian Federation
Eduard Reingoldovich Virshke — Dr.Sc.(Med)
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The author of this article, Vsevolod B. Matveev, is a member of the Editorial Board of the journal Urology Herald. The article underwent the journal's established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest
Zh. T. Fatiyan
Russian Federation
Zhaklin T. Fatiyan
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The author of this article, Vsevolod B. Matveev, is a member of the Editorial Board of the journal Urology Herald. The article underwent the journal's established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest
N. A. Arzhanukhina
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Arzhanukhina
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The author of this article, Vsevolod B. Matveev, is a member of the Editorial Board of the journal Urology Herald. The article underwent the journal's established peer-review process. The authors declared no other conflicts of interest
References
1. Soria F., Shariat S.F., Lerner S.P., Fritsche H.M., Rink M, Kassouf W., Spiess P.E., Lotan Y., Ye D., Fernández M.I., Kikuchi E., Chade D.C., Babjuk M., Grollman A.P., Thalmann G.N. Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). World J Urol. 2017;35(3):379-387. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1928-x
2. Colin P., Koenig P., Ouzzane A., Berthon N., Villers A., Biserte J., Rouprêt M. Environmental factors involved in carcinogenesis of urothelial cell carcinomas of the upper urinary tract. BJU Int. 2009;104(10):1436- 1440. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08838.x
3. Cosentino M., Palou J., Gaya J.M., Breda A., Rodriguez-Faba O., Villavicencio-Mavrich H. Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: location as a predictive factor for concomitant bladder carcinoma. World J Urol. 2013;31(1):141-145. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0877-2
4. Rouprêt M., Seisen T., Birtle A.J., Capoun O., Compérat E.M., Dominguez-Escrig J.L., Gürses Andersson I., Liedberg F., Mariappan P., Hugh Mostafid A., Pradere B., van Rhijn B.W.G., Shariat S.F., Rai B.P., Soria F, Soukup V., Wood R.G., Xylinas E.N., Masson-Lecomte A., Gontero P. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update. Eur Urol. 2023;84(1):49-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.013
5. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Bladder Cancer (Version 1.2023). National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2023. Accessed on June 15, 2025. URL: https://wellprept-prod-storage.s3.amazonaws.com/files/331_ZlgDUr1t_.pdf
6. Traxer O., Keller E.X. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2020;38(8):1883-1894. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5
7. Defidio L., Antonucci M., De Dominicis M., Fuchs G., Patel A. ThuliumHolmium:YAG Duo Laser in Conservative Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer Treatment: 13 Years Experience from a Tertiary National Referral Center. J Endourol. 2019;33(11):902-908. DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0308
8. Cutress M.L., Stewart G.D., Zakikhani P, Phipps S, Thomas B.G., Tolley D.A. Ureteroscopic and percutaneous management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): systematic review. BJU Int. 2012;110(5):614-628. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11068.x
9. Yakoubi R., Colin P., Seisen T., Léon P., Nison L., Bozzini G., Shariat S.F., Rouprêt M. Radical nephroureterectomy versus endoscopic procedures for the treatment of localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a metaanalysis and a systematic review of current evidence from comparative studies. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(12):1629-1634. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.06.007
10. Leow J.J., Chong Y.L., Chang S.L., Valderrama B.P., Powles T., Bellmunt J. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy. Eur Urol. 2021;79(5):635-654. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.003
11. Hosogoe S., Hatakeyama S., Kusaka A., Hamano I., Iwamura H., Fujita N., Yamamoto H., Tobisawa Y., Yoneyama T., Yoneyama T., Hashimoto Y., Koie T., Ohyama C. Platinum-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(6):946-953. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.013
12. Bajorin D.F., Witjes J.A., Gschwend J.E., Schenker M, Valderrama B.P., Tomita Y., Bamias A., Lebret T., Shariat S.F., Park S.H., Ye D., Agerbaek M., Enting D, McDermott R., Gajate P., Peer A., Milowsky M.I., Nosov A., Neif Antonio J. Jr, Tupikowski K., Toms L., Fischer B.S., Qureshi A., Collette S., Unsal-Kacmaz K., Broughton E., Zardavas D., Koon H.B., Galsky M.D. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(22):2102-2114. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2021;385(9):864. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034442
13. Seisen T., Peyronnet B., Dominguez-Escrig J.L., Bruins H.M., Yuan C.Y., Babjuk M., Böhle A., Burger M., Compérat E.M., Cowan N.C., Kaasinen E., Palou J., van Rhijn B.W., Sylvester R.J., Zigeuner R., Shariat S.F., Rouprêt M. Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2016;70(6):1052-1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.014
14. Lughezzani G., Jeldres C., Isbarn H., Shariat S.F., Sun M., Pharand D., Widmer H., Arjane P., Graefen M., Montorsi F., Perrotte P., Karakiewicz .PI. A critical appraisal of the value of lymph node dissection at nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urology. 2010;75(1):118-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1296
15. Roscigno M., Shariat S.F., Margulis V., Karakiewicz P., Remzi M., Kikuchi E., Zigeuner R., Weizer A., Sagalowsky A., Bensalah K., Raman J.D., Bolenz C., Kassou W, Koppie T.M., Wood C.G., Wheat J., Langner C., Ng C.K., Capitanio U., Bertini R., Fernández M.I., Mikami S., Isida M., Ströbel P., Montorsi F. The extent of lymphadenectomy seems to be associated with better survival in patients with nonmetastatic upper-tract urothelial carcinoma: how many lymph nodes should be removed? Eur Urol. 2009;56(3):512-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.004
Review
For citations:
Skvortsov I.Ya., Nikolaeva E.M., Matveev V.B., Virshke E.R., Fatiyan Zh.T., Arzhanukhina N.A. Organ-sparing treatment in synchronous bilateral upper tract urothelial carcinoma and bladder cancer. Urology Herald. 2026;14(4):99-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2026-14-4-99-106
JATS XML





































