Indications for ureteropyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction and hydronephrosis

Introduction. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction and hydronephrosis remain among the most common indications for reconstructive surgery of the upper urinary tract in children. Yet the wording of current clinical guidelines leaves room for ambiguous interpretation of when pyeloplasty is truly indicated.

Objective. To trace how thinking about indications for pyeloplasty in children with hydronephrosis due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction has evolved, to contrast international and national guidance, and to underscore the need for a holistic appraisal of imaging, functional, and clinical data—and their trajectories—when charting a treatment course and deciding on surgery.

Materials & methods. We performed an analytical review of clinical guidelines, national textbooks, and landmark publications on pyeloplasty indications, focusing on ultrasound criteria, functional metrics, their longitudinal changes, and symptomatology.

Results. Over time, the threshold for pyeloplasty has moved away from relying on a static snapshot of hydronephrosis grade toward a multifactorial paradigm that weighs split renal function, progression of dilatation, diuretic renography findings, and clinical presentation. Most international guidelines caution against using any single ultrasound parameter as a stand-alone trigger for operation. Even so, the phrasing of European Association of Urology recommendations—and how they are sometimes read in national documents—still allows an overly liberal reading, in which a high SFU hydronephrosis grade and/or an enlarged anteroposterior pelvic diameter may be mistaken by themselves as sufficient grounds for pyeloplasty.

Conclusion. Contemporary evidence supports a decision-making model in which paediatric pyeloplasty is offered not based on one morphological sign, but on an integrated, dynamic assessment of imaging, function, and symptoms. National guidelines would benefit from clearer wording that guards against overinterpretation and helps ensure surgery is reserved for those who truly stand to gain.

1. European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on Paediatric Urology. Arnhem, The Netherlands: EAU Guidelines Office; 2025. Section 3.14: Dilatation of the upper urinary tract (UPJ and UVJ obstruction). Accessed October 17, 2025. URL: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/paediatric-urology

2. Fernbach S.K., Maizels M., Conway J.J. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23(6):478-480. DOI: 10.1007/BF02012459

3. Wiener J.S., Emmert G.K., Mesrobian H.G., Whitehurst A.W., Smith L.R., King L.R. Are modern imaging techniques over diagnosing ureteropelvic junction obstruction? J Urol. 1995;154(2 Pt 2):659-661. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199508000-00086

4. Capello S.A., Kogan B.A., Giorgi L.J. Jr, Kaufman R.P. Jr. Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1425-1428. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000173130.86238.39

5. Varda B.K., Wang Y., Chung B.I., Lee R.S., Kurtz M.P., Nelson C.P., Chang S.L. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(4):336.e1-336.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.010

6. Farkas A., Mersel A., Zilberman M., Moriel EZ. The outcome of antenatal detected hydronephrosis. Clinical experience with 104 cases. Presented at the Ninth Congress of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association; August 30–September 4, 1992; Jerusalem, Israel. In: Abstracts of the 9th Congress of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association. Pediatr Nephrol. 1992;6:C23-C203. DOI: 10.1007/BF00874026

7. Chertin B., Pollack A., Koulikov D., Rabinowitz R., Hain D., Hadas-Halpren I., Farkas A. Conservative treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children with antenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis: lessons learned after 16 years of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2006;49(4):734- 738. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.046

8. Onen A. An alternative grading system to refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis and optimal treatment guidelines in neonates with primary UPJ-type hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3(3):200-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.08.002

9. Dias C.S., Silva J.M., Pereira A.K., Marino V.S., Silva L.A., Coelho A.M., Costa F.P., Quirino I.G., Simões E Silva A.C., Oliveira E.A. Diagnostic accuracy of renal pelvic dilatation for detecting surgically managed ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2013;190(2):661-666. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.014

10. Braga L.H., McGrath M., Farrokhyar F., Jegatheeswaran K., Lorenzo A.J. Associations of Initial Society for Fetal Urology Grades and Urinary Tract Dilatation Risk Groups with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Isolated Prenatal Hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2017;197(3 Pt 2):831-837. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.099

11. Taş N., Uslu Gökçeoğlu A., Akbulut A., Koca G., Ağras K., Korkmaz M. Role of ultrasonography and dynamic renal scintigraphy parameters in decision making regarding performance of pyeloplasty in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease. 2024;18(6):367-372. DOI: 10.12956/tchd.1470638

12. Li B., McGrath M., Farrokhyar F., Braga L.H. Ultrasound-Based Scoring System for Indication of Pyeloplasty in Patients With UPJO-Like Hydronephrosis. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:353. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00353

13. Falqueto L.E., Amarante A.C.M., Schultz K.L., Simões M.L.P.B., Braga L.H. The value of the ultrasound score to indicate pyeloplasty in unilateral hydronephrosis: a retrospective study with 120 Brazilian children. Humanidades & Tecnologia (FINOM). 2025;62(1):1-11. Accessed on October 17, 2025. URL: https://revistas.icesp.br/index.php/FINOM_Humanidade_Tecnologia/article/view/6743/0

14. Rodríguez L.V., Lock J., Kennedy W.A., Shortliffe L.M. Evaluation of sonographic renal parenchymal area in the management of hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2001;165(2):548-551. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200102000-00066

15. Shapiro S.R., Wahl E.F., Silberstein M.J., Steinhardt G. Hydronephrosis index: a new method to track patients with hydronephrosis quantitatively. Urology. 2008;72(3):536-538; discussion 538-539. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.02.007

16. Rickard M., Lorenzo A.J., Braga L.H. Renal Parenchyma to Hydronephrosis Area Ratio (PHAR) as a Predictor of Future Surgical Intervention for Infants With High-grade Prenatal Hydronephrosis. Urology. 2017;101:85-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.09.029

17. Gradwell L.EF., Neel A.KF., Somani B.K. Predictive tools and scoring systems for surgical intervention in antenatal hydronephrosis and pelviureteric junction obstruction: An ATLAS based on comprehensive review of literature. Urol Ann. 2025;17(3):133-143. DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_88_25

18. Capolicchio J.P., Braga L.H., Szymanski K.M. Canadian Urological Association/Pediatric Urologists of Canada guideline on the investigation and management of antenatally detected hydronephrosis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018;12(4):85-92. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5094

19. Sinha A., Bagga A., Krishna A., Bajpai M., Srinivas M., Uppal R., Agarwal I. Revised guidelines on management of antenatal hydronephrosis. Indian J Nephrol. 2013;23(2):83-97. DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.109403

20. Kohno M., Ogawa T., Kojima Y., Sakoda A., Johnin K., Sugita Y., Nakane A., Noguchi M., Moriya K., Hattori M., Hayashi Y., Kubota M. Pediatric congenital hydronephrosis (ureteropelvic junction obstruc tion): Medical management guide. Int J Urol. 2020;27(5):369-376. DOI: 10.1111/iju.14207

21. Leonardo C.R., Muzzi A., Tavora J.E., Soares R.Q. The outcomes of minilaparoscopic pyeloplasty in children - brazilian experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(2):253-259. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0381

22. Chen Z., Wang Y., Wu C., Chen H., Cui X., Zhou C. Double J stent combined with pyelostomy tube in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year clinical experience in a single center. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):181. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01351-1

23. Razumovskiyi A.Yu., ed. Detskaya khirurgiya: natsional’noe rukovodstvo. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow: GEHOTAR-Media; 2021. (In Russian).

24. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Gidronefroz. 2025. (In Russian). Accessed on October 17, 2025. URL: https://ooorou.ru/upload/iblock/8d0/2qsgvwiacqgz8fu7lewl8ua6tpbhgyqy/KR-Gidronefroz-Peresmotr-18.07.2025-Obsuzhdenie.pdf