Preview

Urology Herald

Advanced search

Perioperative surgical outcomes in patients with seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis and metastases to retroperitoneal lymph nodes

https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2026-14-3-40-47

Abstract

Introduction. Despite the high sensitivity of seminomatous germ cell tumours to platinum-based chemotherapy, a substantial proportion of patients retain residual retroperitoneal tumour masses after induction therapy. Their presence necessitates retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), which offers both diagnostic and therapeutic value. However, RPLND remains a technically demanding procedure with a high risk of complications, particularly in cases of bulky residual tumours and pronounced fibrosis.

Objective. To evaluate perioperative outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis and metastases to retroperitoneal lymph nodes.

Materials & methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes in 60 patients with histologically confirmed seminoma and residual tumour after induction chemotherapy who underwent RPLND between 2004 and 2026. The following parameters were analysed: age, side of primary tumour, TNM clinical stage, serum tumour marker levels (AFP, β-hCG, LDH) before and after chemotherapy, chemotherapy regimens and number of lines, operative time, blood loss, need for extended resections and vascular reconstruction, intraand postoperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification, histological composition of residual tissue (necrosis/fibrosis, teratoma, viable seminoma), and requirement for adjuvant therapy.

Results. Mean operative time was 240 minutes, and mean blood loss was 500 mL. Extended procedures requiring organ resection/removal or vascular reconstruction/resection were necessary in 20.0% (n = 12) of patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 13.3% (n = 8) of patients. Pathomorphological examination of residual tumour revealed complete response (necrosis) in 63.3% (n = 38), viable seminoma in 21.7% (n = 13), and mature teratoma (pure or in combination with necrosis) in 15.0% (n = 9) of patients. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 16.7% (n = 10) of patients.

Conclusion. RPLND for metastatic seminoma is a technically complex surgical procedure characterised by a high rate of extended operations and significant blood loss, underscoring the need for these procedures to be performed in specialised centres with advanced equipment and experienced surgeons. The decision to perform RPLND and determination of its extent should be based on the size and location of residual masses, imaging findings, and the patient's overall condition, given the high risk of intraoperative complications associated with bulky tumour masses.

About the Authors

E. M. Nikolaeva
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Ekaterina M. Nikolaeva

Moscow



V. B. Matveev
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Vsevolod B. Matveev — Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof., Acad. the RAS

Moscow



O. A. Khalmurzaev
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Oibek A. Khalmuraev — Cand.Sc.(Med)

Moscow



G. A. Arakelyan
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Gevorg A. Arakelyan — Cand.Sc.(Med)

Moscow



M. P. Korchagin
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Russian Federation

Mikhail P. Korchagin

Moscow



References

1. Oldenburg J, Berney DM, Bokemeyer C, Climent MA, Daugaard G, Gietema JA, De Giorgi U, Haugnes HS, Huddart RA, Leão R, Sohaib A, Gillessen S, Powles T; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org; EURACAN. Testicular seminoma and nonseminoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(4):362-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.002

2. Matveev V.B., Volkova M.I., Gladkov O.A., Klimov A.V., Semenova A.I., Rumyantsev A.A., Tryakin A.A., Tyulyandin S.A., Fedyanin M.Yu. Germinogennye opukholi u muzhchin. Malignant tumours. 2025;15(3s2- 1.2):287-321. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2025-15-3s2-1.2-11

3. Fizazi K, Tjulandin S, Salvioni R, Germà-Lluch JR, Bouzy J, Ragan D, Bokemeyer C, Gerl A, Fléchon A, de Bono JS, Stenning S, Horwich A, Pont J, Albers P, De Giorgi U, Bower M, Bulanov A, Pizzocaro G, Aparicio J, Nichols CR, Théodore C, Hartmann JT, Schmoll HJ, Kaye SB, Culine S, Droz JP, Mahé C. Viable malignant cells after primary chemotherapy for disseminated nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: prognostic factors and role of postsurgery chemotherapy--results from an international study group. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(10):2647-2657. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.10.2647

4. Spiess PE, Brown GA, Liu P, Tannir NM, Tu SM, Evans JG, Czerniak B, Kamat AM, Pisters LL. Predictors of outcome in patients undergoing postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Cancer. 2006;107(7):1483-1490. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22182

5. Matveev V.B., Figurin K.M., Volkova M.I., Chernyaev V.A., Mitin A.V. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after induction chemotherapy in metastatic testicular non-seminoma. Cancer Urology. 2010;6(1):52- 58. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2010-6-1-52-58

6. Rice KR, Beck SD, Bihrle R, Cary KC, Einhorn LH, Foster RS. Survival analysis of pure seminoma at post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Urol. 2014;192(5):1397-1402. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.097

7. Beck SD, Peterson MD, Bihrle R, Donohue JP, Foster RS. Short-term morbidity of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a contemporary group of patients. J Urol. 2007;178(2):504-506; discussion 506. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.123

8. Subramanian VS, Nguyen CT, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA. Complications of open primary and post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Urol Oncol. 2010;28(5):504-509. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.10.026

9. Heidenreich A, Pfister D, Witthuhn R, Thüer D, Albers P. Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in advanced testicular cancer: radical or modified template resection. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):217-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.027

10. Matveev V.B., Volkova M.I., Arakelyan G.A., Feinstein I.A., Sergeev Yu.S., Fedyanin M.Yu., Rumyantsev A.A., Tryakin A.A., Tyulyandin S.A. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with advanced nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors and incomplete radiological and serological response to chemotherapy: results. Malignant tumours. 2021;11(2):27-37. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2021-11-2-27-37


Review

For citations:


Nikolaeva E.M., Matveev V.B., Khalmurzaev O.A., Arakelyan G.A., Korchagin M.P. Perioperative surgical outcomes in patients with seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis and metastases to retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Urology Herald. 2026;14(3):40-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2026-14-3-40-47

Views: 26

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-6424 (Online)