Use of a ureteral sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-3-137-146
Abstract
One of the contemporary methods for treating kidney stones up to 2 cm in size is retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Advances in technology and the development of new techniques have expanded the indications for RIRS. The use of ureteral access sheaths is not mandatory; however, there are several reasons why urologists commonly employ them, including facilitating repeated and safe access to the kidney, reducing intrarenal pressure, minimizing the risk of instrument damage, and decreasing the likelihood of ureteral wall trauma during stone extraction. This literature review presents findings from studies demonstrating the safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths in RIRS for patients with kidney stones up to 2 cm. Parameters assessed included characteristics of the ureteral sheaths, operative time, stone-free rate, intra- and postoperative complications, as well as the impact of the sheath on the ureteral wall. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA protocol (http://www.prisma-statement.org) applicable to this type of study (ID-423604). Articles published in international databases such as Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus were analyzed.
Supporting agencies: The study was not sponsored
About the Authors
S. V. Popov
St. Luke’s Clinical Hospital; Petersburg Medical and Social Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Popov — Dr.Sc.(Med).
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
I. N. Orlov
St. Luke’s Clinical Hospital; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Igor N. Orlov — Cand.Sc.(Med).
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
D. A. Sytnik
St. Luke’s Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Dmitriy A. Sytnik
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
Yu. A. Mikheev
St. Luke’s Clinical Hospital; Petersburg Medical and Social Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Yury A. Mikheev
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
References
1. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris 2024
2. Клинические рекомендации «Мочекаменная болезнь» МЗ РФ, 2024
3. Takayasu H, Aso Y. Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J Urol. 1974;112(2):176-178. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59675-5
4. Al-Qahtani SM, Letendre J, Thomas A, Natalin R, Saussez T, Traxer O. Which ureteral access sheath is compatible with your flexible ureteroscope? J Endourol. 2014;28(3):286-290. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0375
5. Monga M, Gawlik A, Durfee W. Systematic evaluation of ureteral access sheaths. Urology. 2004;63(5):834-836. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.12.025
6. Gur U, Holland R, Lask DM, Livne PM, Lifshitz DA. Expanding use of ureteral access sheath for stones larger than access sheath’s internal diameter. Urology. 2007;69(1):170-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.049
7. Chen Y, Li C, Gao L, Lin L, Zheng L, Ke L, Chen J, Kuang R. Novel Flexible Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath Can Actively Control Intrarenal Pressure and Obtain a Complete Stone-Free Status. J Endourol. 2022;36(9):1143-1148. DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0004
8. Chen Y, Zheng L, Lin L, Li C, Gao L, Ke L, Kuang R, Chen J. A novel flexible vacuum-assisted ureteric access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int. 2022;130(5):586-588. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15873
9. Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM. Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol. 2001;165(3):789-793. PMID: 11176469.
10. Traxer O, Wendt-Nordahl G, Sodha H, Rassweiler J, Meretyk S, Tefekli A, Coz F, de la Rosette JJ. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol. 2015;33(12):2137-2144. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1582-8
11. Damar E, Senocak C, Ozbek R, Haberal HB, Sadioglu FE, Yordam M, Bozkurt OF. Does ureteral access sheath affect the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(5):777-781. DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2021.1941117
12. Yitgin Y, Yitgin E, Verep S, Gasimov K, Tefik T, Karakose A. Is Access Sheath Essential for Safety and Effective Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021;31(10):1202-1206. DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.10.1202
13. Pardalidis NP, Papatsoris AG, Kapotis CG, Kosmaoglou EV. Treatment of impacted lower third ureteral stones with the use of the ureteral access sheath. Urol Res. 2006;34(3):211-214. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-006-0044-6
14. Berquet G, Prunel P, Verhoest G, Mathieu R, Bensalah K. The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones. World J Urol. 2014;32(1):229-232. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1181-5
15. Thomsen HS. Pyelorenal backflow. Clinical and experimental investigations. Radiologic, nuclear, medical and pathoanatomic studies. Dan Med Bull. 1984;31(6):438-457. PMID: 6394220.
16. Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J, Lee DI, Felfela T, Conradie MC, Srinivas R, Sundaram CP, Clayman RV. Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology. 2003;61(4):713-718. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02440-8
17. Jung H, Osther PJ. Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy. Springerplus. 2015;4:373. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4
18. Schwalb DM, Eshghi M, Davidian M, Franco I. Morphological and physiological changes in the urinary tract associated with ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy: an experimental study. J Urol. 1993;149(6):1576-185. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36456-x
19. Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, Raj GV, Santa-Cruz RW, Preminger GM. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):33-36. DOI: 10.1089/089277904322836631
20. Fang L, Xie G, Zheng Z, Liu W, Zhu J, Huang T, Lu Y, Cheng Y. The Effect of Ratio of Endoscope-Sheath Diameter on Intrapelvic Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopic Lasertripsy. J Endourol. 2019;33(2):132-139. DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0774
21. MacCraith E, Yap LC, Elamin M, Patterson K, Brady CM, Hennessey DB. Evaluation of the Impact of Ureteroscope, Access Sheath, and Irrigation System Selection on Intrarenal Pressures in a Porcine Kidney Model. J Endourol. 2021;35(4):512-517. DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0838
22. Sener TE, Tanidir Y, Bin Hamri S, Sever IH, Ozdemir B, Al-Humam A, Traxer O. Effects of flexible ureteroscopy on renal blood flow: a prospective evaluation. Scand J Urol. 2018;52(3):213-218. DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1437770
23. L’esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr, Marguet CG, Springhart WP, Maloney ME, Albala DM, Preminger GM. Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology. 2005;66(2):252-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.019
24. Lallas CD, Auge BK, Raj GV, Santa-Cruz R, Madden JF, Preminger GM. Laser Doppler flowmetric determination of ureteral blood flow after ureteral access sheath placement. J Endourol. 2002;16(8):583-590. DOI: 10.1089/089277902320913288
25. Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580-584. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197
26. Schoenthaler M, Buchholz N, Farin E, Ather H, Bach C, Bach T, Denstedt JD, Fritsche HM, Grasso M, Hakenberg OW, Herwig R, Knoll T, Kuehhas FE, Liatsikos E, Liske P, Marberger M, Osther PJ, Santos JM, Sarica K, Seitz C, Straub M, Traxer O, Trinchieri A, Turney B, Miernik A. The Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS): a multicenter video-based evaluation of inter-rater reliability. World J Urol. 2014;32(4):1033-1040. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1185-1
27. Guzelburc V, Guven S, Boz MY, Erkurt B, Soytas M, Altay B, Albayrak S. Intraoperative Evaluation of Ureteral Access Sheath-Related Injuries Using Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(1):23-26. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0294
28. Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Ardelt PU, Adams F, Kuehhas FE, Schoenthaler M. Standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique to improve stone-free rates. Urology. 2012;80(6):1198-1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.042.
29. Barbour ML, Raman JD. Incidence and Predictors for Ipsilateral Hydronephrosis Following Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy. Urology. 2015;86(3):465-471. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.016
30. Baş O, Tuygun C, Dede O, Sarı S, Çakıcı MÇ, Öztürk U, Göktuğ G, İmamoğlu A. Factors affecting complication rates of retrograde flexible ureterorenoscopy: analysis of 1571 procedures-a single-center experience. World J Urol. 2017;35(5):819-826. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1930-3
31. Law YXT, Teoh JYC, Castellani D, Lim EJ, Chan EOT, Wroclawski M, Pirola GM, Giulioni C, Rubilotta E, Gubbioti M, Scarcella S, Chew BH, Traxer O, Somani BK, Gauhar V. Role of pre-operative ureteral stent on outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS): systematic review and meta-analysis of 3831 patients and comparison of Asian and non-Asian cohorts. World J Urol. 2022;40(6):1377-1389. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03935-2
32. Mahajan PM, Padhye AS, Bhave AA, Sovani YB, Kshirsagar YB, Bapat SS. Is stenting required before retrograde intrarenal surgery with access sheath. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(3):326-328. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.56185
33. Chang X, Wang Y, Li J, Han Z. Prestenting Versus Nonprestenting on the Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Large Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2021;105(7-8):560-567. DOI: 10.1159/000506652
34. Geavlete P, Mulţescu R, Geavlete B. Re: Application of Suctioning Ureteral Access Sheath During Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones Decreases the Risk of Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. Eur Urol. 2024;85(1):94. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.020
35. Elbir F, Başıbüyük İ, Topaktaş R, Kardaş S, Tosun M, Tepeler A, Armağan A. Flexible ureterorenoscopy results: Analysis of 279 cases. Turk J Urol. 2015;41(3):113-118. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2015.81488
36. Yuruk E, Binbay M, Ozgor F, Erbin A, Berberoglu Y, Muslumanoglu AY. Flexible ureterorenoscopy is safe and efficient for the treatment of kidney stones in patients with chronic kidney disease. Urology. 2014;84(6):1279-1284. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.038
37. Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Katzenwadel A, Ardelt P, Wetterauer U, Traxer O, Miernik A. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in treatment of nephrolithiasis: is a 100% stone-free rate achievable? J Endourol. 2012;26(5):489-493. DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0405
38. Mogilevkin Y, Sofer M, Margel D, Greenstein A, Lifshitz D. Predicting an effective ureteral access sheath insertion: a bicenter prospective study. J Endourol. 2014;28(12):1414-1417. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0215
39. Viers BR, Viers LD, Hull NC, Hanson TJ, Mehta RA, Bergstralh EJ, Vrtiska TJ, Krambeck AE. The Difficult Ureter: Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics Associated With Upper Urinary Tract Access at the Time of Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment. Urology. 2015;86(5):878-884. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.007
40. Kuntz NJ, Neisius A, Tsivian M, Ghaffar M, Patel N, Ferrandino MN, Sur RL, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME. Balloon Dilation of the Ureter: A Contemporary Review of Outcomes and Complications. J Urol. 2015;194(2):413-417. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2917
41. Jacquemet B, Martin L, Pastori J, Bailly V, Guichard G, Bernardini S, Chabannes E, Bittard H, Kleinclauss F. Comparison of the efficacy and morbidity of flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones compared with other renal locations. J Endourol. 2014;28(10):1183-1187. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0286
42. Ulvik Ø, Rennesund K, Gjengstø P, Wentzel-Larsen T, Ulvik NM. Ureteroscopy with and without safety guide wire: should the safety wire still be mandatory? J Endourol. 2013;27(10):1197-1202. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0248
43. Koo KC, Yoon JH, Park NC, Lee HS, Ahn HK, Lee KS, Kim DK, Cho KS, Chung BH, Hong CH. The Impact of Preoperative α-Adrenergic Antagonists on Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion Force and the Upper Limit of Force Required to Avoid Ureteral Mucosal Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Urol. 2018;199(6):1622-1630. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.173
44. Erturhan S, Bayrak Ö, Şen H, Yılmaz AE, Seçkiner İ. Can alpha blockers facilitate the placement of ureteral access sheaths in retrograde intrarenal surgery? Turk J Urol. 2019;45(2):108-112. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.63373
45. Köprü B, Ebiloğlu T, Kaya E, Zor M, Bedir S, Topuz B, Sarikaya S, Ergin G, Yalçin S. Does preoperative use of silodosin affect the stages of F-URS procedure? Arch Esp Urol. 2020;73(1):47-53. (In English, Spanish). PMID: 31950923
46. Kim JK, Choi CI, Lee SH, Han JH, Shim YS, Choo MS; Young Endourological Study group. Silodosin for Prevention of Ureteral Injuries Resulting from Insertion of a Ureteral Access Sheath: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(2):572-579. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.009
47. Bozzini G, Bevilacqua L, Besana U, Calori A, Pastore A, Romero Otero J, Macchi A, Broggini P, Breda A, Gozen A, Inzillo R, Puliatti S, Sighinolfi MC, Rocco B, Liatsikos E, Muller A, Buizza C. Ureteral access sheath-related injuries vs. post-operative infections. Is sheath insertion always needed? A prospective randomized study to understand the lights and shadows of this practice. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021:S0210-4806(21)00125-X. (In English, Spanish). DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.11.010. Epub ahead of print.
48. Hawken SR, Hiller SC, Daignault-Newton S, Ghani KR, Hollingsworth JM, Conrado B, Maitland C, Wenzler DL, Ludlow JK, Ambani SN, Brummett CM, Dauw CA; Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative. Opioid-Free Discharge is Not Associated With Increased Unplanned Healthcare Encounters After Ureteroscopy: Results From a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative. Urology. 2021;158:57-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.037
49. Oğuz U, Şahin T, Şenocak Ç, Özyuvalı E, Bozkurt ÖF, Reşorlu B, Ünsal A. Factors associated with postoperative pain after retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones. Turk J Urol. 2017;43(3):303-308. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.58997
Review
For citations:
Popov S.V., Orlov I.N., Sytnik D.A., Mikheev Yu.A. Use of a ureteral sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urology Herald. 2025;13(3):137-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-3-137-146
Views:
31
Email this article 
