REASONS AND TREATMENT FOR URETERAL AVULSION
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-3-5-16
Abstract
Abstract. From 2010 to 2016 years we obsreved 8 patients with ureteral avulsion after endoscopic surgeries. All patients were men, their age ranged from 50 to 71 years. In all patients the ureter was damaged during ureteroscopy with lithotripsy and lithoextraction. Of the 8 patients, two had proximal ureteral avulsion between upper and middle thirds, four had ureteral avulsion 4 cm away from the pyeloureteral junction , two had had complete pyeloureteral junction avulsion. In 7 cases trauma of ureter occured at other hospitals. These patients were underwent revision of retroperitoneal space and drain for kidney by nephrostomy (6) and ureterocutaneostomy (1). One case occurred at our department and this patient was underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation. The patient with ureterocutaneostomy was treated by nephrovesical bypass. In 6 patients with extended ureteral strictures we performed ileoureteroplasty. Results of reconstructive surgeries and nephrovesical bypass were successful in all patients. No intra- and postoperative complications. Mean operative time during uleoureteroplasty was 180 min, laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation – 210 min, nephrovesical bypass – 110 min. Ureteral avulsion often associated with ureterosopy in patients with large impacted proximal ureteral stones. In most cases after these injuries were diagnosed extended ureteral stricture that requires performing for autotransplantation or ileoureteroplasty.
About the Authors
B. K. Komyakov
North-Western State Medical University named by I.I.Mechnikov, Saint-Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
B. G. Guliev
North-Western State Medical University named by I.I.Mechnikov, Saint-Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. N. Idrisov
Hospital «Scandinaviya», Saint-Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. S. Shipilov
Department of urology of Nikolayevskaya hospital, Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Gupta V. Complete ureteral avulsion. / Gupta V., Sadasukhi T.C., Sharma K.K. et al. // Sci. World J. – 2005. – Vol. 28. – P. 125 – 127.
2. Al-Awadi K. Iatrogenic ureteral injures: Incidence, etiological factors and the effect of early management on subsequent outcome. / Al-Awadi K., Kehinde E.O., Al-Hunayan A. et al. // Int. Urol. Nephrol. – 2005. – Vol. 37. – P. 235 – 241.
3. de la Rosette J.J. Handling and prevention of complications in stone basketing. / de la Rosette J.J., Skrekas T., Segura J.W. // Eur. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 50. – P. 991 – 998.
4. Abdelrahim A.F. Rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: Factors associated with intraoperative adverse events. /Abdelrahim A.F., Abdelmaguid A., Abuzeid H. et al. // J. Endourol. – 2008. – Vol. 22. – P. 277 – 280.
5. Комяков Б.К. Оперативное лечение больных с отрывом мочеточника. / Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г. // Урология. – 2015. – № 3. – С. 14 – 18.
6. Shekarriz B. Laparoscopic nephrectomy and autotransplantation for severe iatrogenic ureteral injures. / Shekarriz B., Lu H., Duh Q. et al. // Urology. – 2001. – Vol. 58. – P. 540 – 543.
7. Meng M.V. Eхpanded experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy and autotransplantation for severe ureteral injury. /Meng M.V., Freise C.E., Stoller M.L. // J. Urol. – 2003. – Vol. 169. – P. 1363 – 1367.
8. Ge C. Management of complete ureteral avulsion and literature review: A report on four cases. /Ge C., Li Q., Wang L. et al. // J. Endourol. – 2011. – Vol. 25. – P. 323 – 326.
9. Комяков Б.К. Результаты лапароскопической тонкокишечной пластики мочеточника. /Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г. // Вестник урологии. – 2015. – № 4. – C. 24 – 28.
10. Stein R.J. Laparoscopic assisted ileal ureter: technique, outcomes and comparison to the open procedure. /Stein R.J., Turna B., Patel N.S. et al. // J. Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 82. – P. 1032 – 1039.
11. Nissenkorn I. Nephrovesical subcutaneous stent: an alternative to permanent nephrostomy. /Nissenkorn I., Gdor Y. //J. Urol. – 2000. – Vol.163. – P. 528 – 530.
12. Комяков Б.К. Реканализация мочеточников. // Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г. - СПб., Неский диалект, 2010. – 212 с.
13. Lloyd S.N. The detour extra-anatomic stent – a permanent solution for benign and malignant ureteric obstruction? /Lloyd S.N., Tiruronda P., Biyani C.S., Wah T.M., Irving H.C. // Eur. Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 52. – P. 193 – 198.
14. Ordon M. Ureteral avulsion during contemporary ureterscopic stone management: «The scabbard avulsion». / Ordon M., Schuler T.D., Honey R.J.// J. Endourol. – 2011. – Vol. 25. – P. 1259 – 1262.
15. de la Rosette J.J. The clinical research office or the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: Indications, complications and outcomes in 11,885 patients./ de la Rosette J.J., Denstedt J., Geavlete P. et al. // J. Endourol. – 2014. – Vol. 28. – P. 131 – 139.
16. Tanimoto R. Ureteral avulsion associated with ureteroscopy: insights from the MAUDE database. / Tanimoto R., Ceary R., Bagkey D., Hubosky S. // J. Endourol. – 2016. – Vol. 30. – P. 257 – 261.
17. Hubosky S.G. Locked deflection during flexible ureteroscopy: Incidence and elucidation of the mechanism of an underreported complication. /Hubosky S.G., Raval A.J., Bagley D.H. // J. Endourol. – 2015. – Vol. 29 – P. 907 – 912.
Review
For citations:
Komyakov B.K., Guliev B.G., Idrisov S.N., Shipilov A.S. REASONS AND TREATMENT FOR URETERAL AVULSION. Urology Herald. 2016;(3):5-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-3-5-16
Views:
2026
Email this article 
