Evaulation of varicocelectomy efficacy in primary and secondary infertile men

   Introduction. Varicocele is one of the main causes of subfertility in men with primary and secondary infertility.

   Objective. In this study, we compared the initial semen parameters and the effectiveness of varicocelectomy in men with primary and secondary infertility.

   Materials & methods. 100 men suffering from primary infertility (PI) and secondary infertility (SI) and having varicocelectomy were recruited. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included 58 men with PI and the group 2 42 men with SI. Preoperative clinical characteristics and semen parameters before and after varicocelectomy were analyzed and compared between groups.

   Results. Analysis revealed that the mean age of patients of the group 1 was significantly lower (p < 0,001) and duration of infertility was accurately shorter (p < 0,01) than those of group 2. Main semen parameters increased significantly in group I (e. g., sperm concentration increased by 50 %, from 62,2 ± 8,7 to 93,5 ± 10,0 M/ml and total motile sperm count increased by 113 %, from 76,7 ± 17,1 to 163,4 ± 27,8 M p < 0,05), while in group 2 only % of progressive motile sperm increased significantly (by 107 %, from 13,5 ± 2,6 to 28,0 ± 5,2 % p < 0,05). We identified significant difference in varicocelectomy efficacy between group 1 and group 2 in change of total motile sperm count (by 113 % vs. 74 % respectively, p < 0,01). We also revealed discrepancy between groups in correlation ratio (r) between initial and post-surgical percentage of progressive motile sperm.

   Conclusions. Patients with SI were older and had longer infertility period. Varicocelectomy resulted in significant semen parameters improvement in patients with PI. In patients with SI only a percent of progressively motile sperm improved significantly. It shows that male age and infertility duration may negatively affect varicocelectomy outcomes in male subfertility treatment.

1. Akilov F.A., Mukhtarov Sh.T., Shomarufov A.B., Abbosov Sh.A., Shavakhabov Sh.Sh., Mirkhamidov D.Kh., Giyasov Sh.I., Kasimov S.S., Abdukarimov O.O. Assessment of semen parameters after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men from infertile couples. Urology Herald. 2023;11(3):16-22. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-3-16-22

2. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, eds. Campbell-Walsh urology. 11^th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier; 2016.

3. Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, Farsi HM. Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011;59(3):455-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.008

4. Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Dohle G, Jarvi K, Salonia A, Weidner W, Zini A. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):796-808. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.018

5. Ficarra V, Cerruto MA, Liguori G, Mazzoni G, Minucci S, Tracia A, Gentile V. Treatment of varicocele in subfertile men: The Cochrane Review --a contrary opinion. Eur Urol. 2006;49(2):258-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.023

6. Miyaoka R, Esteves SC. A critical appraisal on the role of varicocele in male infertility. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:597495. DOI: 10.1155/2012/597495

7. Persad E, O’Loughlin CA, Kaur S, Wagner G, Matyas N, Hassler-Di Fratta MR, Nussbaumer-Streit B. Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;4(4):CD000479. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000479.pub6

8. Fukuda T, Miyake H, Enatsu N, Matsushita K, Fujisawa M. Assessment of Time-dependent Changes in Semen Parameters in Infertile Men After Microsurgical Varicocelectomy. Urology. 2015;86(1):48-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.014

9. Walsh TJ, Wu AK, Croughan MS, Turek PJ. Differences in the clinical characteristics of primarily and secondarily infertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(3):826-830. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.071

10. Jungwirth A, Giwercman A, Tournaye H, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Dohle G, Krausz C; European Association of Urology Working Group on Male Infertility. European Association of Urology guidelines on Male Infertility: the 2012 update. Eur Urol. 2012;62(2):324-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.048

11. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and processing of human semen. 6^th edition. Geneva: WHO Press, 2021.

12. World Health Organization. BMI Classification. Global Database on Body Mass Index. 2006.

13. Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, Agarwal R, Short RA, Sabanegh E, Marmar JL. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology. 2007;70(3):532-538. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.011

14. Samplaski MK, Yu C, Kattan MW, Lo KC, Grober ED, Zini A, Lau S, Jarvi KA. Nomograms for predicting changes in semen parameters in infertile men after varicocele repair. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.046

15. Shomarufov AB, Bozhedomov VA, Akilov FA, Mukhtarov ST, Giyasov SI, Abbosov SA, Kamalov AA. Prediction of reproductive function recovery after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men from infertile couples: Clinical and laboratory predictors. Andrologia. 2021;53(8):e14101. DOI: 10.1111/and.14101

16. Shomarufov AB, Bozhedomov VA, Sorokin NI, Matyukhov IP, Fozilov AA, Abbosov SA, Kamalov AA. Predictors of microsurgical varicocelectomy efficacy in male infertility treatment: critical assessment and systematization. Asian J Androl. 2023;25(1):21-28. DOI: 10.4103/aja2021125

17. Bozhedomov V.A., Shomarufov A.B., Bozhedomova G.E., Okhobotov D.A., Kamalov D.M., Kamalov A.A. Varicocele and reproductive function: epidemiology and infertility risk (the eamination of 3632 patients). Urologiia. 2021;(3):122-128. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2021.3.122-128

18. Bozhedomov V.A., Shomarufov A.B., Bozhedomova G.E., Ohobotov D.A., Kamalov D.M., Sorokin N.I., Kamalov A.A. Varicocele and reproductive function: pathozoospermia treatment (a prospective comparative study). Urologiia. 2021;(2):62-68. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2021.2.62-68