Preview

Urology Herald

Advanced search

Replacement of extended ureteral strictures in children: a multicenter experience with appendicoplasty

https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-4-145-154

Abstract

Introduction. The first description of ureteral appendicoplasty was provided by the Italian surgeon Giannettasio in 1901, followed by two German surgeons, Franke and Rydygier. Their work was later included in a review by Melnikoff in 1912. However, it is Melnikoff who is often erroneously credited with performing the first appendicoplasty in the literature. The first ureteral appendicoplasty operation on a 1.5-year-old child in Russia was performed by Soloviev in 1976.

Objective. To report the results of performing operations on replacement of ureteral defects by ureteral appendicoplasty in children.

Materials & Methods. Between 2009 and 2023, a total of 11 surgeries were conducted to replace extended ureteral defects using the appendix technique in four clinics in Russia and the Republic of Belarus. The follow-up included six boys and five girls with an average age of 79 months (ranging from 18 months to 16 years). Six operations were performed by laparoscopic access (mean operative time 356 minutes). Five operations were performed by open access (mean operative time 257 minutes).

Results. Long-term results were assessed between 18 and 192 months in all patients. Urinary tract patency was evaluated based on the results of micturition cystography (in one case, vesicoureteral reflux was recorded) and intravenous urography (one case of stenosis of the distal anastomosis, which was corrected by endoscopic dissection of the stricture site using a fiberoureteroscope). In patients who underwent renoscintigraphy, no progression of renal function decline was observed. In all patients, long-term follow-up showed satisfactory urine passage.

Conclusion. The results of the surgical interventions performed by us are assessed as good. In all 11 cases, the replacement of the extended ureteral stricture using an appendix allowed for the restoration of urinary flow. Furthermore, any complications that arose did not necessitate repeated reconstruction of the urinary tract. Nevertheless, it is important to note that, in our opinion, this technique cannot be considered the method of choice. Rather, it represents a last resort for patients who have undergone multiple previous operations due to severe trauma or oncological diseases. In cases involving ureteral strictures, priority should always be given to an operation involving anastomosis with sufficient ureteral length and minimal tissue tension. We firmly believe that this approach offers the best chance for a successful outcome.

About the Authors

I. M. Kagantsov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre; Children's City Hospital No. 22; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ilya M. Kagantsov — Dr.Sc.(Med).

St. Petersburg


Competing Interests:

None



K. I. Pelikh
Children's City Hospital No. 22
Russian Federation

Kirill I. Pelikh.

St. Petersburg


Competing Interests:

None



V. I. Dubrov
Second City Children's Clinical Hospital
Belarus

Vitali I. Dubrov — Dr.Sc. (Med), Assoc.Prof. (Docent).

Minsk


Competing Interests:

None



V. V. Sizonov
Rostov Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Sizonov — Dr.Sci.(Med.); Full Prof.

Rostov-on-Don


Competing Interests:

None



O. S. Shmyrov
Morozovsky Children's City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Oleg S. Smyrov — Cand.Sc.(Med).

Moscow


Competing Interests:

None



E. A. Kontratyeva
Almazov National Medical Research Centre; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation

Evgeniya A. Kontrateva.

St. Petersburg; Moscow


Competing Interests:

None



References

1. Meljnikov I, Radojcić B, Grebeldinger S, Radojcić N. [History of surgical treatment of appendicitis]. Med Pregl. 2009;62(9-10):489-492. (In Serbian). PMID: 20391748

2. Melnikoff AE. Sur le remplacement de l’urettre par anse isolee de I’intestin grille [On the replacement of the urethra by isolated loop of the small intestine]. ReV Clin Urol. 1912;1:601. (In French).

3. Solov'ev A.E. Plastika mochetochnika cherveobraznym otrostkom u rebenka. Hirurgija. 1976;(9):136-137. (In Russian).

4. Martin LW. Use of the appendix to replace a ureter. Case report. J Pediatr Surg. 1981;16(6):799-800. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(81)80821-4

5. Mesrobian HG, Azizkhan RG. Pyeloureterostomy with appendiceal interposition. J Urol. 1989;142(5):1288-1289. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39059-6

6. Richter F, Stock JA, Hanna MK. The appendix as right ureteral substitute in children. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1908-1912. PMID: 10799226

7. Dagash H, Sen S, Chacko J, Karl S, Ghosh D, Parag P, Mackinnon AE. The appendix as ureteral substitute: a report of 10 cases. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4(1):14-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.08.004

8. Obaidah A, Mane SB, Dhende NP, Acharya H, Goel N, Thakur AA, Arlikar J. Our experience of ureteral substitution in pediatric age group. Urology. 2010;75(6):1476-1480. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1327

9. Kumar P, Sarin YK. Use Of Appendix As Neoureter- A Ray Of Hope. J Neonatal Surg. 2017;6(3):64. DOI: 10.21699/jns.v6i3.576

10. Yoon BI, Hong CG, Kim S, Ha US, Chung JH, Kim SW, Cho YH, Sohn DW. Ureteral substitution using appendix for a ureteral defect caused by a retroperitoneal rhabdomyosarcoma in a child. Korean J Urol. 2014;55(1):77-79. DOI: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.1.77

11. Deyl RT, Averbeck MA, Almeida GL, Pioner GT, Souto CA. Appendix interposition for total left ureteral reconstruction. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5(3):237-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.11.010

12. Cao H, Zhou H, Yang F, Ma L, Zhou X, Tao T, Liu D, Xing N, Cheng W, Feng Z. Laparoscopic appendiceal interposition pyeloplasty for long ureteric strictures in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(6):551.e1-551.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.06.017

13. Komyakov B.K., Ochelenko V.A., Al-Attar T.H., Mhanna H.M., Shevnin M.V. Lower urinary tract urodynamics after reconstruction of the pelvic part of the ureter. Urologiia. 2020;(3):10-14. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2020.3.10-14

14. Komatz Y, Itoh H. A case of ureteral injury repaired with appendix. J Urol. 1990;144(1):132-133. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39391-6

15. Estevão-Costa J. Autotransplantation of the vermiform appendix for ureteral substitution. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34(10):1521-1523. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90117-3

16. Jang TL, Matschke HM, Rubenstein JN, Gonzalez CM. Pyeloureterostomy with interposition of the appendix. J Urol. 2002;168(5):2106-2107. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64306-6

17. Benderev TV. Acetylcysteine for urinary tract mucolysis. J Urol. 1988;139(2):353-354. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42412-8

18. Williams TR, Diallo I, Issa M, Massarweh NN. Ureteral reconstruction with appendiceal interposition graft following resection of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. J Surg Case Rep. 2023;2023(7):rjad414. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjad414

19. Weinberg RW. Appendix Ureteroplasty. British Journal of Urology. 1976;48:234.

20. Nosov A.K., Rumyantseva D.I., Mamizhev E.M., Lushina P.A., Shchekuteev N.A., Berkut M.V. Left-sided flap transposition of the appendix for urethroplasty in oncourology. Cancer Urology. 2022;18(1):127-135. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-1-127-135

21. Lee M, Lee Z, Metro MJ, Eun DD. Robotic Ureteral Bypass Surgery with Appendiceal Graft for Management of Long-Segment Radiation-Induced Distal Ureteral Strictures: A Case Series. J Endourol Case Rep. 2020;6(4):305-309. DOI: 10.1089/cren.2020.0105

22. Jun MS, Stair S, Xu A, Lee Z, Asghar AM, Strauss D, Stifelman MD, Eun D, Zhao LC; Collaborative of Reconstructive Robotic Ureteral Surgery (CORRUS). A Multi-Institutional Experience With Robotic Appendiceal Ureteroplasty. Urology. 2020;145:287-291. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.062


Review

For citations:


Kagantsov I.M., Pelikh K.I., Dubrov V.I., Sizonov V.V., Shmyrov O.S., Kontratyeva E.A. Replacement of extended ureteral strictures in children: a multicenter experience with appendicoplasty. Urology Herald. 2024;12(4):145-154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-4-145-154

Views: 444


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-6424 (Online)