Preview

Urology Herald

Advanced search

LAPAROSCOPIC ADENOMECTOMY (PRELIMINARY RESULTS)

https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-1-24-31

Abstract

Bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) remains one of the most common problems of men in the advanced age group. Open prostatectomy for patients with large BPH is still the standard treatment recommended by the European Association of Urology and is performed quiet often. Disadvantages of this method of treatment are significant surgical trauma and high rate of perioperative complications . Laparoscopic modification of simple prostatectomy presents a worthy minimal invasive alternative to open surgical treatment of BPH. From November 2014 to December 2015, laparoscopic adenomectomy was performed for 16 patients. 7 (43.5%) patients had transperitoneal (TP) and 9 (56.25%) patients had extraperitoneal (EP) laparoscopic simple prostatectomy. None of the cases required conversion . All patients were discharged in satisfactory condition with complete restoration of free micturation. Laparoscopic prostatectomy as a method of surgical treatment for BPH can be easily reproducible. It can be adopted as a routine urological practice for large-sized BPH with the aim of minimizing operative trauma and achieving short hospital stay.

About the Authors

A. Yu. Seroukhov
V.M. Buyanov City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
Department of Urology


E. A. Pronkin
V.M. Buyanov City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
Department of Urology


K. I. Glinin
V.M. Buyanov City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
Department of Urology


I. E. Mamaev
V.M. Buyanov City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
Department of Urology


References

1. Parsons JK. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Epidemiology and Risk Factors .Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep (2010) 5:212–218.

2. Garraway WM, Collins GN, Lee RJ. High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community.Lancet. 1991;338:469–471.

3. Seki N, Mochida O, Kinukawa N, Sagiyama K, Naito S. Holmium laser enucleation for prostatic adenoma: analysis of learning curve over the course of 70 consecutive cases. J Urol 2003;170:1847–50.

4. Elzayat EA and Elhilali MM (2007) Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: laser. AUA Update Series 2007 26: lesson 27

5. ElHakim A and Elhilali MM (2002) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate can be taught: the first learning experience. BJU Int 90: 863869

6. Shah HN et al. (2007) Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol 177: 14681474

7. Jones JS et al. (2008) Probability of finding T1a and T1b (incidental) prostate cancer during TURP has decreased in the PSA era. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis doi:10.1038/pcan.2008.14]

8. Merrill RM and Wiggins CL (2002) Incidental detection of population based prostate cancer incidence rates through transurethral resection of the prostate. Urol Oncol 7: 213219

9. Asimakopoulos AD et al. The surgical treatment of a large prostatic adenoma: the laparoscopic approach-a systematic review. J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):960-7.


Review

For citations:


Seroukhov A.Yu., Pronkin E.A., Glinin K.I., Mamaev I.E. LAPAROSCOPIC ADENOMECTOMY (PRELIMINARY RESULTS). Urology Herald. 2016;(1):24-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-1-24-31

Views: 2176


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-6424 (Online)