Impact of infectious complications in the overall structure of urethroplasty complications, treatment and antibiotic prophylaxis: a systematic review
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-4-141-150
Abstract
Introduction. Urethroplasty is a urological operation that is widely used in the management of urethral stricture (US). However, postoperative complications are relatively common in this procedure. In their structure, infection takes the leading position in most cases. Nevertheless, to date the problems of prevention and treatment of infectious complications, be it urinary tract infection (UTI) or wound infection, remain poorly studied.
Objective. To generalise and critically analyse the worldwide literature data on infectious complications in urethroplasty, as well as to study the expediency and validity of infectious conditions treatment before urethroplasty, the efficacy of the protective effect of antibiotic prophylaxis in the aspect of postoperative complications.
Materials & methods. The study was conducted accordance with the recommendations on preferred reporting elements for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The search was conducted in the PubMed database from 1992 to 2022 by keywords, considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria which led to the selection of twenty papers for further study.
Results. We have observed the influence of UTI on postoperative complications or recurrence. The presence of infectious postoperative complications, in turn, also has a significant impact on US recurrence. Some authors have drawn attention to the influence of surgical aspects, bed-days and aetiology of US on the incidence of surgical site infection. The studies to date provide little insight into the appropriateness of preurethroplasty infection treatment and antibiotic prophylaxis in the context of their impact on complications and US recurrence which leave these issues open to debate.
Conclusion. Infectious complications are the most frequent hospital-acquired sequela after surgery; consequently, more efforts should be made to eliminate them in patients receiving urethroplasty. The systematic review revealed insufficient study of the issues of complications and US recurrence prevention in urethroplasty, no consensus on the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis regimes and the appropriateness of preoperative UTI treatment.
About the Authors
Yu. L. NabokaRussian Federation
Yulia L. Naboka — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Prof.; Head, Dept. of Microbiology and Virology No.1
Rostov-on-Don
E. M. Kotieva
Russian Federation
Elizaveta M. Kotieva — Student
Rostov-on-Don
V. M. Kotieva
Russian Federation
Violetta M. Kotieva — Student
Rostov-on-Don
M. I. Kogan
Russian Federation
Mikhail I. Kogan — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof., Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation; Head, Dept. of Urology, Pediatric Urology & Reproductive Health
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Flynn BJ, Delvecchio FC, Webster GD. Perineal repair of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects: experience in 120 patients during the last 10 years. J Urol. 2003;170(5):1877-80. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091642.41368.f5
2. Santucci RA, Mario LA, McAninch JW. Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture: analysis of 168 patients. J Urol. 2002;167(4):1715-9. PMID: 11912394
3. Elliott SP, Metro MJ, McAninch JW. Long-term followup of the ventrally placed buccal mucosa onlay graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 2003;169(5):1754-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000057800.61876.9b
4. Navai N, Erickson BA, Zhao LC, Okotie OT, Gonzalez CM. Complications following urethral reconstructive surgery: a six year experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34(5):594-600; discussion 601. DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382008000500008
5. Lacy JM, Madden-Fuentes RJ, Dugan A, Peterson AC, Gupta S. Short-term Complication Rates Following Anterior Urethroplasty: An Analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data. Urology. 2018;111:197-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.006
6. Kay HE, Srikanth P, Srivastava AV, Tijerina AN, Patel VR, Hauser N, Laviana AA, Wolf JS Jr, Osterberg EC. Preoperative and intraoperative factors predictive of complications and stricture recurrence following multiple urethroplasty techniques. BJUI Compass. 2021;2(4):286-291. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.83
7. Armstrong BN, Renson A, Zhao LC, Bjurlin MA. Development of novel prognostic models for predicting complications of urethroplasty. World J Urol. 2019;37(3):553-559. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2413-5
8. Mathur R, Aggarwal G, Satsangi B. A retrospective analysis of delayed complications of urethroplasty at a tertiary care centre. Updates Surg. 2011;63(3):185-90. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-011-0093-4
9. MacDonald S, Haddad D, Choi A, Colaco M, Terlecki R. Anterior Urethroplasty Has Transitioned to an Outpatient Procedure Without Serious Rise in Complications: Data From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Urology. 2017;102:225-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.09.043
10. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2022. ISBN: 978-94-92671-16-5
11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):89. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
12. Kim S, Cheng KC, Patell S, Alsikafi NF, Breyer BN, Broghammer JA, Elliott SP, Erickson BA, Myers JB, Smith TG 3rd, Vanni AJ, Voelzke BB, Zhao LC, Buckley JC. Antibiotic Stewardship and Postoperative Infections in Urethroplasties. Urology. 2021;152:142-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.065
13. Yuan W, Gu Y, Zhang K, Liang T, Wang P, Zhang J, Xu Y, Fu Q, Song L. Postoperative Infection of Male Posterior Urethral Stenosis with Pelvic Fracture: A Retrospective Study from a Chinese Tertiary Teferral Center. Urology. 2021;154:294-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.021
14. Mathur R, Aggarwal G, Satsangi B. A retrospective analysis of delayed complications of urethroplasty at a tertiary care centre. Updates Surg. 2011;63(3):185-90. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-011-0093-4
15. Ibrahim AG, Ali N, Aliyu S, Bakari AA. One-stage urethroplasty for strictures in maiduguri, north eastern Nigeria. ISRN Urol. 2012;2012:847870. DOI: 10.5402/2012/847870
16. Granieri MA, Webster GD, Peterson AC. Critical Analysis of Patient-reported Complaints and Complications After Urethroplasty for Bulbar Urethral Stricture Disease. Urology. 2015;85(6):1489-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.002
17. Awad SMT, Ahmed MAM, Abdalla YMO, Ahmed MEIM, Gismalla MD. Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral stricture, experience from a low-income country. BMC Urol. 2021;21(1):171. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00918-0
18. Abdelhameed H, Elgamal S, Farha MA, El-Abd A, Tawfik A, Soliman M. The long-term results of lingual mucosal grafts for repairing long anterior urethral strictures. Arab J Urol. 2015;13(2):128-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2014.11.009
19. Lin Y, Luo D, Liao B, Yang T, Tian Y, Jin T, Wang G, Zhou H, Li H, Wang K. Perineal midline vertical incision verses inverted-U incision in the urethroplasty: which is better? World J Urol. 2018;36(8):1267-1274. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2267-x
20. McDonald ML, Buckley J. Antimicrobial Practice Patterns for Urethroplasty: Opportunity for Improved Stewardship. Urology. 2016;94:237-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.051
21. Granieri MA, Webster GD, Peterson AC. Critical Analysis of Patient-reported Complaints and Complications After Urethroplasty for Bulbar Urethral Stricture Disease. Urology. 2015;85(6):1489-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.002
22. Al-Qudah HS, Santucci RA. Extended complications of urethroplasty. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31(4):315-23; discussion 324-5. DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382005000400004
23. Bascom A, Ghosh S, Fairey AS, Rourke KF. Assessment of Wound Complications After Bulbar Urethroplasty: The Impact of a Lambda Perineal Incision. Urology. 2016;90:184-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.047
24. Meeks JJ, Erickson BA, Granieri MA, Gonzalez CM. Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1266-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.027
25. Manjunath A, Chen L, Welty LJ, Wong VJ, Amarasekera C, Gonzalez CM, Hofer MD. Antibiotic prophylaxis after urethroplasty may offer no benefit. World J Urol. 2020;38(5):1295-1301. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02880-x ⦁ Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, Reston J, Rourke K, Stoffel JT, Vanni AJ, Voelzke BB, Zhao L, Santucci RA. Male Urethral Stricture: American Urological Association Guideline. J Urol. 2017;197(1):182-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.087
26. Anger JT, Santucci R, Grossberg AL, Saigal CS. The morbidity of urethral stricture disease among male medicare beneficiaries. BMC Urol. 2010;10:3. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-10-3
27. Clarke SA, Samuel M, Boddy SA. Are prophylactic antibiotics necessary with clean intermittent catheterization? A randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(3):568-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.11.027
28. Roberts RR, Hota B, Ahmad I, Scott RD 2nd, Foster SD, Abbasi F, Schabowski S, Kampe LM, Ciavarella GG, Supino M, Naples J, Cordell R, Levy SB, Weinstein RA. Hospital and societal costs of antimicrobial-resistant infections in a Chicago teaching hospital: implications for antibiotic stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(8):1175-84. DOI: 10.1086/605630
29. Baas W, Parker A, Radadia K, Ogawa S, Vetter J, Paradis A, Meyer M, Murphy G. Antibiotic Duration After Urethroplasty: An Attempt at Improving Antibiotic Stewardship. Urology. 2021;158:228-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.028
Review
For citations:
Naboka Yu.L., Kotieva E.M., Kotieva V.M., Kogan M.I. Impact of infectious complications in the overall structure of urethroplasty complications, treatment and antibiotic prophylaxis: a systematic review. Urology Herald. 2023;11(4):141-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-4-141-150