Thulium laser treatment of benign bladder neck stenosis
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-4-44-51
Abstract
Introduction. High recurrence rate of bladder neck stenosis after application of existing endoscopic and reconstructive surgeries determines the relevance of studying new methods of treatment. In this respect, it is promising to study the possibilities of thulium laser.
Objective. To study the efficacy and safety of a thulium laser for the treatment of benign bladder neck stenosis.
Materials & methods. The study included 24 men with bladder neck stenosis of benign aetiology who underwent surgical treatment using the «Urolaz» (“IRE-Polus”, Fryasino, Russian Federation) thulium fibre laser. The treatment results were evaluated 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months (mo) after surgery, and then annually.
Results. Postoperative follow-up time ranged from 3 to 50 mo (mean 21.1 ± 7.1 mo). With these follow-up periods, treatment was successful in 21 (87.5%) patients. The average period of recurrence was 2.8 ± 1.1 mo after surgery. A significant improvement in the following parameters was found in all periods of postoperative follow-up relative to preoperative data: maximum urination rate, average urination rate, residual urine volume, IPSS scores, and quality of life (p < 0.05). Early and late postoperative complications occurred in 8 (33.3%) and 2 (8.3%) patients, respectively, and all of them were mild and corresponded to the Clavien-Dindo I.
Conclusions. The use of a thulium fibre laser for benign bladder neck stenosis makes it possible to achieve sufficiently high rates of efficiency and safety of treatment. This method can be considered among the main treatment options for this disease.
About the Authors
M. I. KatibovRussian Federation
Magomed I. Katibov — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Assoc.Prof.(Docent); Head, Urology Division
Makhachkala
A. B. Bogdanov
Russian Federation
Andrey B. Bogdanov — M.D., Сand.Sc.(Med); Assoc.Prof., Dept. of Urology and Surgical Andrology; Urologist, Urology Division
Moscow
M. M. Alibekov
Russian Federation
Magomedali M. Alibekov — M.D.; Assist.Prof., Dept. of Urology; Urologist, Urology Division
Makhachkala
Z. M. Magomedov
Russian Federation
Zaurbeg M. Magomedov — M.D., Сand.Sc.(Med); Assist.Prof., Dept. of Surgical Diseases; Urologist, Urology Division
Makhachkala
Z. A. Dovlatov
Russian Federation
Zyaka A. Dovlatov — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med); Assoc.Prof., Dept. of Urology and Surgical Andrology
Moscow
References
1. Cindolo L, Marchioni M, Emiliani E, DE Francesco P, Primiceri G, Castellan P, Schips L. Bladder neck contracture after surgery for benign prostatic obstruction. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69(2):133-143. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02777-6
2. Popov S.V., Orlov I.N., Tsoy A.V., Chernysheva D.Yu. Bladder neck stenosis after surgical treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Epidemiology. Modern treatment options. Jeksperimental'naja i klinicheskaja urologija. 2021;14(1):100-107. (In Russian). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-1-100-107
3. Primiceri G, Castellan P, Marchioni M, Schips L, Cindolo L. Bladder Neck Contracture After Endoscopic Surgery for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(10):79. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0723-6
4. Castellani D, Wroclawski ML, Pirola GM, Gauhar V, Rubilotta E, Chan VW, Cheng BK, Gubbiotti M, Galosi AB, Herrmann TRW, Teoh JY. Bladder neck stenosis after transurethral prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2021;39(11):4073-4083. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03718-1
5. Abbosov Sh.A., Sorokin N.I., Kadrev A.V., Shomarufov A.B., Strigunov A.A., Kabanova O.O., Nesterova O.Yu., Shaparov B.M., Kamalov А.А. Bladder neck sclerosis: alternative methods of treatment and prospects for their development. Jeksperimental'naja i klinicheskaja urologija. 2021;14(3):94-99. (In Russian). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-3-94-99
6. Popov S.V., Orlov I.N., Tsoi A.V., Topuzov T.M., Chernysheva D.Yu. YV-plasty in the treatment of patients with recurrent bladder neck stenosis. Vestnik urologii. 2022;10(1):52-59. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-1-52-59
7. Ramirez D, Simhan J, Hudak SJ, Morey AF. Standardized approach for the treatment of refractory bladder neck contractures. Urol Clin North Am. 2013;40(3):371-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.04.012
8. Chang CH, Lin TP, Chang YH, Huang WJ, Lin AT, Chen KK. Vapoenucleation of the prostate using a high-power thulium laser: a one-year follow-up study. BMC Urol. 2015;15:40. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-015-0032-7
9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
10. Vanni AJ, Zinman LN, Buckley JC. Radial urethrotomy and intralesional mitomycin C for the management of recurrent bladder neck contractures. J Urol. 2011;186(1):156-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.019
11. Zhang L, Liu S, Wu K, Mu X, Yang L. Management of highly recurrent bladder neck contractures via transurethral resection combined with intra- and post-operative triamcinolone acetonide injections. World J Urol. 2021;39(2):527-532. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03224-w
12. Musch M, Hohenhorst JL, Vogel A, Loewen H, Krege S, Kroepfl D. Robot-assisted laparoscopic Y-V plasty in 12 patients with refractory bladder neck contracture. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(1):139-145. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0708-y
13. Sayedahmed K, El Shazly M, Olianas R, Kaftan B, Omar M. The outcome of Y-V plasty as a final option in patients with recurrent bladder neck sclerosis following failed endoscopic treatment. Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(4):408-412. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1977
14. Reiss CP, Rosenbaum CM, Becker A, Schriefer P, Ludwig TA, Engel O, Riechardt S, Fisch M, Dahlem R. The T-plasty: a modified YV-plasty for highly recurrent bladder neck contracture after transurethral surgery for benign hyperplasia of the prostate: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. World J Urol. 2016;34(10):1437-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1779-5
15. Rosenbaum CM, Dahlem R, Maurer V, Kluth LA, Vetterlein MW, Fisch M, Schuettfort V, Reiss CP. The T-plasty as therapy for recurrent bladder neck stenosis: success rate, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction. World J Urol. 2017;35(12):1907-1911. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2089-2
16. Avallone MA, Quach A, Warncke J, Nikolavsky D, Flynn BJ. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Subtrigonal Inlay of Buccal Mucosal Graft for Treatment of Refractory Bladder Neck Contracture. Urology. 2019;130:209. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.02.048
17. Bozkurt O, Sen V, Demir O, Esen A. Subtrigonal Inlay Patch Technique with Buccal Mucosa Graft for Recurrent Bladder Neck Contractures. Urol Int. 2022;106(3):256-260. DOI: 10.1159/000517894
18. Mamaev I.E., Akhmedov K.K., Bolotov A.D., Yusufov A.G., Kotov S.V. Transurethral resection and buccal mucosal graft for the treatment of refractory bladder neck contracture. Urologiia. 2022;(4):63-67. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2022.4.63-67
19. Enikeev D, Taratkin M. Thulium Fiber Laser: Bringing Lasers to a Whole New Level. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;48:31-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.07.007
20. Vinarov A.Z., Dymov A.M., Sorokin N.I., Minaev V.P., Lekarev V.Yu. Laser hydrodynamic biotissue dissection in operative urology. Andrologiya i genital’naya khirurgiya. 2018;19(2):21-30. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17650/2070-9781-2018-19-2-21-30
21. Wendt-Nordahl G, Huckele S, Honeck P, Alken P, Knoll T, Michel MS, Häcker A. Systematic evaluation of a recently introduced 2-microm continuous-wave thulium laser for vaporesection of the prostate. J Endourol. 2008;22(5):1041-5. DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0421
Review
For citations:
Katibov M.I., Bogdanov A.B., Alibekov M.M., Magomedov Z.M., Dovlatov Z.A. Thulium laser treatment of benign bladder neck stenosis. Urology Herald. 2023;11(4):44-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-4-44-51