Thesis research in urology: what is good and what is bad?

Abstract

Insufficient attention of clinicians to scientific research is one of the major concerns of medical education. To date, urological science is developing so rapidly that it is difficult for physicians to stay within the limits of modern technology. Urological science and clinical management should closely cooperate and share experience. In this regard, it seems useful to understand the problems of thesis research in urology. Of course, to understand not all the problems, but only a part of them, presented on the website of the High Certification Committee. Ten-year analysis (2013 – 2022) allows us to see trends and weaknesses, to form assumptions about the causes of processes and to see adjusting directions of unfavourable influencing factors on scientific research in urology.