Preview

Urology Herald

Advanced search

Analysis of the effect of clinical and laboratory parameters on survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer with intermediate prognosis according to IMDC (International mRCC Database Consortium)

https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-2-110-121

Abstract

Introduction. Most patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who received systemic therapy are classified into as intermediate risk group according to the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) assessment. However, survival differs in patients with one and two unfavourable prognostic risk factors.

Objective. To analyze the impact of possible clinical and laboratory parameters on survival in mRCC patients with intermediate prognosis according to IMDC in the presence of one or two unfavourable prognostic risk factors.

Materials & methods. A retrospective analysis of data from 316 mRCC patients with intermediate prognosis receiving systemic therapy was carried out. The presence and effect on survival of the following laboratory parameters were compared: hemoglobin, neutrophil count, LDH, platelet count, alkaline phosphatase, serum calcium level, ESR, and emphasis was also placed on the time of metastases appearance. Overall survival (OS), post-progression survival (PPS), and 3- and 5-year survival were evaluated.

Results. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rate for subgroups with one and two unfavourable prognostic risk factors were 85.2%  ±  1.8% and 58.1  ±  1.6%; 79.1%  ±  1.7% and 35.6  1.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). Three- and 5-year PPS for both subgroups amounted to 66.1%  ±  1.6% and 21.8%  ±  1.4%; 45.2%  ±  1.5% and 12.2%  ±  1.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). Median for OS was 61 and 51 months and PPS was 50 and 32 months respectively (p <0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in the frequency of gradations of the investigated laboratory indicators with a predictive effect on prognosis, depending on the number of a unfavourable prognostic risk factors. There were also no significant differences in survival rates when laboratory parameters deviated from the normal, except for hemoglobin: OS in patients with one prognostic factor is significantly higher with normal hemoglobin (p < 0.05). In the future, considering the absence of influence of the selected factors on survival rates with their obvious significant differences in patients with one and two prognostic factors, the influence of the time of appearance of metastases (synchronous / metachronous) was analysed: all survival parameters were significantly worse in patients with synchronous metastases. Furthermore, OS in patients with metachronous metastases with the same relapse-free period was significantly better in patients with one prognostic factor according to IMDC.

Conclusions. The presence of one or two prognostic factors significantly affects the indicators of 3 and 5-year overall survival and PPS in patients with an intermediate prognosis of mRCC, while laboratory parameters do not affect survival, except for hemoglobin levels, the time of metastases appearance has a significant effect, and the time of metastases appearance has a significant effect.

About the Authors

D. V. Semenov
St. Petersburg City Clinical Oncological Dispensary; St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Dmitry V. Semenov — M.D., Сand.Sc.(Med); Assoc.Prof., Dept. of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, St. Petersburg State University; Oncological Urologist, Oncological Urology Division, St. Petersburg City Clinical Oncological Dispensary.

St. Petersburg


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



R. V. Orlova
St. Petersburg City Clinical Oncological Dispensary; St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Rashida V. Orlova — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof.; Head, Dept. of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, St. Petersburg State University; Chief Specialist in Clinical Oncology, St. Petersburg City Clinical Oncological Dispensary.

St. Petersburg


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



V. I. Shirokorad
Moscow City Oncological Hospital No. 62
Russian Federation

Valeriy I. Shirokorad — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med); Head, Oncological Urology Division, Moscow City Oncological Hospital No. 62.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



S. V. Kostritsky
Moscow City Oncological Hospital No. 62
Russian Federation

Stanislav V. Kostritsky — M.D.; Oncological Urologist, Oncological Urology Division, Moscow City Oncological Hospital No. 62.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



M. I. Gluzman
St. Petersburg City Clinical Oncological Dispensary; St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Mark I. Gluzman — M.D., Сand.Sc.(Med); Assoc.Prof., Dept. of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, St. Petersburg State University; Head, Dept. of Antitumor Drug Therapy, St. Petersburg City Clinical Oncological Dispensary.

St. Petersburg


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



S. G. Grigoriev
Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

Stepan G. Grigoriev — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof.; Senior Researcher, Research Institute of Medical Information Technologies, Kirov Military Medical Academy.

St. Petersburg


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



Yu. S. Korneva
St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 26; Smolensk State Medical University; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation

Yulia S. Korneva — M.D., Сand.Sc.(Med); Assoc.Prof., Dept. of Pathology, Smolensk State Medical University; Assoc.Prof., Dept. of Pathology, Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University; Pathologist, Pathology Division, St. Petersburg City Hospital No. 26

Smolensk, St. Petersburg


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



References

1. Volkova M.I., Alekseev B.Ja., Gladkov O.A., Matveev V.B., Nosov D.A. Prakticheskie rekomendacii po lekarstvennomu lecheniju pochechnokletochnogo raka. Zlokachestvennye opuholi. 2022;12(3s2-1):579-588. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2022-12-3s2-579-588

2. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR, Sahi C, Eigl BJ, Ruether JD, Cheng T, North S, Venner P, Knox JJ, Chi KN, Kollmannsberger C, McDermott DF, Oh WK, Atkins MB, Bukowski RM, Rini BI, Choueiri TK. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(34):5794-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4809

3. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Harshman LC, Bjarnason GA, Vaishampayan UN, Mackenzie M, Wood L, Donskov F, Tan MH, Rha SY, Agarwal N, Kollmannsberger C, Rini BI, Choueiri TK. External validation and comparison with other models of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(2):141-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70559-4

4. Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, Arén Frontera O, Melichar B, Choueiri TK, Plimack ER, Barthélémy P, Porta C, George S, Powles T, Donskov F, Neiman V, Kollmannsberger CK, Salman P, Gurney H, Hawkins R, Ravaud A, Grimm MO, Bracarda S, Barrios CH, Tomita Y, Castellano D, Rini BI, Chen AC, Mekan S, McHenry MB, Wind-Rotolo M, Doan J, Sharma P, Hammers HJ, Escudier B; CheckMate 214 Investigators. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(14):1277-1290. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126

5. Choueiri TK, Halabi S, Sanford BL, Hahn O, Michaelson MD, Walsh MK, Feldman DR, Olencki T, Picus J, Small EJ, Dakhil S, George DJ, Morris MJ. Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib As Initial Targeted Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma of Poor or Intermediate Risk: The Alliance A031203 CABOSUN Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(6):591-597. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(32):3736. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(5):521. PMID: 28199818; PMCID: PMC5455807. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.7398

6. Méjean A, Ravaud A, Thezenas S, Colas S, Beauval JB, Bensalah K, Geoffrois L, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Cormier L, Lang H, Guy L, Gravis G, Rolland F, Linassier C, Lechevallier E, Beisland C, Aitchison M, Oudard S, Patard JJ, Theodore C, Chevreau C, Laguerre B, Hubert J, Gross-Goupil M, Bernhard JC, Albiges L, Timsit MO, Lebret T, Escudier B. Sunitinib Alone or after Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(5):417-427. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803675

7. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, Dutcher J, Figlin R, Kapoor A, Staroslawska E, Sosman J, McDermott D, Bodrogi I, Kovacevic Z, Lesovoy V, Schmidt-Wolf IG, Barbarash O, Gokmen E, O'Toole T, Lustgarten S, Moore L, Motzer RJ; Global ARCC Trial. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(22):2271-81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa066838

8. Sella A, Michaelson MD, Matczak E, Simantov R, Lin X, Figlin RA. Heterogeneity of Patients With Intermediate-Prognosis Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Sunitinib. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15(2):291-299.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.08.013

9. Iacovelli R, De Giorgi U, Galli L, Zucali P, Nolè F, Sabbatini R, Fraccon AP, Basso U, Mosca A, Atzori F, Santini D, Facchini G, Fornarini G, Pasini F, Masini C, Massari F, Buti S, Sava T, Sacco C, Ricotta R, Sperduti I, Tortora G, Porta C. Is It Possible to Improve Prognostic Classification in Patients Affected by Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With an Intermediate or Poor Prognosis? Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16(5):355-359.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.04.007

10. Tamada S, Iguchi T, Yasuda S, Kato M, Yamasaki T, Nakatani T. The difference in the survival rate of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the intermediate-risk group of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center criteria. Oncotarget. 2018;9(45):27752-27759. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25554

11. Guida A, Le Teuff G, Alves C, Colomba E, Di Nunno V, Derosa L, Flippot R, Escudier B, Albiges L. Identification of international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium (IMDC) intermediate-risk subgroups in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2020;11(49):4582-4592. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27762

12. Kim SH, Suh YS, Lee DE, Park B, Joo J, Joung JY, Seo HK, Lee KH, Chung J. A retrospective comparative study of progression-free survival and overall survival between metachronous and synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma in intermediate- or poor-risk patients treated with VEGF-targeted therapy. Oncotarget. 2017;8(55):93633-93643. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20674

13. Joshi A, Ramaswamy A, Noronha V, Patil VM, Chandrasekharan A, Goel A, Sahu A, Sable N, Agrawal A, Menon S, Prabhash K. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in advanced renal cell cancer and validation of Heng criteria. Indian J Cancer. 2016;53(3):423-428. DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.200662


Review

For citations:


Semenov D.V., Orlova R.V., Shirokorad V.I., Kostritsky S.V., Gluzman M.I., Grigoriev S.G., Korneva Yu.S. Analysis of the effect of clinical and laboratory parameters on survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer with intermediate prognosis according to IMDC (International mRCC Database Consortium). Urology Herald. 2023;11(2):110-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-2-110-121

Views: 1031


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-6424 (Online)