Preview

Urology Herald

Advanced search

Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones larger than two centimetres

https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-3-98-105

Abstract

According to the guidelines, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the main treatment for patients with kidney stones larger than 2 cm. However, many studies have recently been published describing the safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the treatment of patients with kidney stones of similar size. This paper reviews the literature on the use of RIRS in the treatment of patients with kidney stones larger than 2 cm. The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RIRS in the treatment of kidney stones larger than 2 cm. Such indicators as the duration of surgical treatment, stone-free rate, intra- and postoperative complications were evaluated. Also, the history of the development of ureteroscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic method for diseases of the upper urinary tract is briefly reviewed. The material was searched in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases.

About the Authors

S. V. Popov
St. Luke St. Petersburg Clinical Hospital; Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Popov — M.D., Dr.Sc. (Med), Full Prof.; Chief Medical Officer; Prof., Dept. of Urology

46 Chugunnaya St., St. Petersburg, 194044, Russian Federation

37A Academician Lebedev, St. Petersburg, 194044, Russian Federation



I. N. Orlov
St. Luke St. Petersburg Clinical Hospital; Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University
Russian Federation

Igor N. Orlov — M.D., Cand.Sc.(Med); Deputy Chief Medical Officer for Medical; Assist., Dept. of Urology

46 Chugunnaya St., St. Petersburg, 194044, Russian Federation

41 Kirochnaya St., St. Petersburg, 191015, Russian Federation



D. A. Sytnik
St. Luke St. Petersburg Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Sytnik — M.D., Urologist, Urology Division No.1, City Centre of Endoscopic Urology and New Technologies

46 Chugunnaya St., St. Petersburg, 194044, Russian Federation



R. M. Radzhabov
St. Luke St. Petersburg Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Rasul M. Radzhabov — Resident, Urology Division No.1, City Centre of Endoscopic Urology and New Technologies

46 Chugunnaya St., St. Petersburg, 194044, Russian Federation



References

1. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1153-60. s://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090

2. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam, 2022. The Netherlands: Arnhem, 2022. URL: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis

3. Aghamir SMK. Successful retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for a 2-centimeter stone in a chronic renal failure (CRF) patient. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;87:106375. s://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106375

4. Pillai SB, Chawla A, de la Rosette J, Laguna P, Guddeti R, Reddy SJ, Sabnis R, Ganpule A, Desai M, Parikh A. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of renal calculi ≤ 2 cm: a propensity matched study. World J Urol. 2022;40(2):553-562. s://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03860-w

5. Liu X, Xia D, Peng E, Tong Y, Liu H, Wang X, He Y, Chen Z, Tang K. Comparison of two techniques for the management of 2-3 cm lower pole renal calculi in obese patients. World J Urol. 2022;40(2):513-518. s://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03872-6

6. Yıldızhan M, Balcı M, Asil E, Kızılkan Y, Aslan Y, Özden C, Tuncel A. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes for kidney stones larger than 2 cm from Guy's stone scoring system perspective. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(12):e14956. s://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14956

7. Fayad MK, Fahmy O, Abulazayem KM, Salama NM. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal pelvic stone more than 2 centimeters: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(1):113-117. s://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01289-9

8. Georgescu D, eds. Retrograde Ureteroscopy. Handbook of Endourology. Academic Press; 2016. eBook ISBN: 9780128026625.

9. Lyon ES, Kyker JS, Schoenberg HW. Transurethral ureteroscopy in women: a ready addition to the urological armamentarium. J Urol. 1978;119(1):35-6. s://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57372-3

10. Pérez-Castro Ellendt E, Martínez-Piñeiro JA. La ureterorrenoscopia transuretral. Un actual proceder urológico [Transurethral ureteroscopy. A current urological procedure]. Arch Esp Urol. 1980;33(5):445-60. (In Spanish) PMID: 7447504

11. Marshall VF. Fiber optics in urology. J Urol. 1964;91:110-4. s://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)64066-7

12. Takagi T, Go T, Takayasu H, Aso Y. Fiberoptic pyeloureteroscope. Surgery. 1971;70(5):661-3 passim. PMID: 5120887

13. Bagley DH, Huffman JL, Lyon ES. Flexible ureteropyeloscopy: diagnosis and treatment in the upper urinary tract. J Urol. 1987;138(2):280-5. s://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43119-3

14. Johnson DE, Cromeens DM, Price RE. Use of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. Lasers Surg Med. 1992;12(4):353-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900120402

15. Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi. J Urol. 1998;160(2):346-51. PMID: 9679874

16. El-Anany FG, Hammouda HM, Maghraby HA, Elakkad MA. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for large renal calculi. BJU Int. 2001;88(9):850-3. s://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01248.x

17. Mariani AJ. Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi. J Urol. 2007;177(1):168-73; discussion173. s://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.066

18. Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier? J Urol. 2008;179(3):981-4. s://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.083

19. Hyams ES, Bruhn A, Lipkin M, Shah O. Heterogeneity in the reporting of disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in studies evaluating treatments for nephrolithiasis. J Endourol. 2010;24(9):1411-4. s://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0645

20. Al-Qahtani SM, Gil-Deiz-de-Medina S, Traxer O. Predictors of clinical outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser for renal stone greater than 2 cm. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:543537. s://doi.org/10.1155/2012/543537

21. Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int. 2013;111(3 Pt B):E127-31. s://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11352.x

22. Miernik A, Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Wetterauer U, Zyczkowski M, Paradysz A, Bryniarski P. Combined semirigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy via a large ureteral access sheath for kidney stones >2 cm: a bicentric prospective assessment. World J Urol. 2014;32(3):697-702. s://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1126-z

23. Pieras E, Tubau V, Brugarolas X, Ferrutxe J, Pizá P. Comparative analysis between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy in kidney stones of 2-3cm. Actas Urol Esp. 2017;41(3):194-199. English, Spanish. s://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2016.08.005

24. Huang JS, Xie J, Huang XJ, Yuan Q, Jiang HT, Xiao KF. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater: A single institutional experience. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(43):e22704. s://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022704

25. Geraghty R, Abourmarzouk O, Rai B, Biyani CS, Rukin NJ, Somani BK. Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;16(8):54. s://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-015-0529-3

26. Erkoc M, Bozkurt M. Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Pelvic Stones of 2-3 cm. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021;31(6):605-609. s://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0860

27. Xu Y, Lu Z, Lan Y, Wu D, Xiong L. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for a staghorn renal calculus in a patient with solitary kidney and urinary tract deformity: a case report. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(8):3532-3539. s://doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-192

28. Karakoyunlu AN, Cakici MC, Sari S, Hepsen E, Ozok HU, Sagnak AL, Topaloglu H, Senturk AB, Ersoy H. Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods For Management of Big- Sized Kidney Stones(? 4 cm): Single Center Retrospective Study. Urol J. 2019;16(3):232-235. s://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.4072

29. Atis G, Culpan M, Pelit ES, Canakci C, Ulus I, Gunaydin B, Yildirim A, Caskurlu T. Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Treating 20-40 mm Renal Stones. Urol J. 2017;14(2):2995-2999. PMID: 28299761

30. Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, Kupilas A, Nowakowski K, Bogacki R. A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol. 2012;26(1):52-7. s://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0235

31. Palmero JL, Durán-Rivera AJ, Miralles J, Pastor JC, Benedicto A. Comparative study for the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nefhrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the treatment of 2-3,5 cm kidney stones. Arch Esp Urol. 2016;69(2):67-72. English, Spanish. PMID: 26959965

32. Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol. 2010;24(10):1583-8. s://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0629

33. Yang E, Jing S, Niu Y, Qi S, Yadav PK, Yang L, Bao J, Tian J, Wang J, Li N, Ou T, Wang Z. Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes as a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial. J Endourol. 2021;35(12):1773-1778. s://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0170

34. Dresner SL, Iremashvili V, Best SL, Hedican SP, Nakada SY. Influence of Lower Pole Infundibulopelvic Angle on Success of Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Renal Stones. J Endourol. 2020;34(6):655-660. s://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0720

35. Auge BK, Dahm P, Wu NZ, Preminger GM. Ureteroscopic management of lower-pole renal calculi: technique of calculus displacement. J Endourol. 2001;15(8):835-8. s://doi.org/10.1089/089277901753205852

36. Bozzini G, Verze P, Arcaniolo D, Dal Piaz O, Buffi NM, Guazzoni G, Provenzano M, Osmolorskij B, Sanguedolce F, Montanari E, Macchione N, Pummer K, Mirone V, De Sio M, Taverna G. A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones. World J Urol. 2017;35(12):1967-1975. s://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2084-7

37. Koyuncu H, Yencilek F, Kalkan M, Bastug Y, Yencilek E, Ozdemir AT. Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower Pole Stones Greater than 2 cm. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(2):245-51. s://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.09


Review

For citations:


Popov S.V., Orlov I.N., Sytnik D.A., Radzhabov R.M. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones larger than two centimetres. Urology Herald. 2022;10(3):98-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-3-98-105

Views: 2240


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-6424 (Online)