Congenital anomalies of the urethra
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-1-131-147
Abstract
Congenital anomalies of the urethra are insufficiently covered in the literature, except for hypospadias and epispadias. Therefore, there is a significant gap in information on the diagnosis, classification and management of patients with such anomalies among practising physicians and researchers. Also, the urgency of studying this problem is due to the complexity of these malformations. This fact dictates the need for a very careful and correct approach to timely surgical treatment and subsequent rehabilitation, which will minimize the negative medical and social consequences of these anomalies. Taking these circumstances into account, key data on the most common congenital anomalies of the urethra were summarized in the form of a lecture material based on modern scientific advances. The following malformations of the urethra are considered as the main options: hypospadias; epispadias; urethral valves, obliterations, strictures, diverticula and cysts; Guerin's sinus; hypertrophy of verumontanum; agenesis of the urethra; urethral duplication; megalourethra; urethral fistulas; urethral polyp. Moreover, all types of anomalies are presented with illustrations of real clinical examples. The information from this study can be successfully used in the daily work for practising physicians of various profiles, scientific and pedagogical activities when teaching students at medical universities, residency training, postgraduate studies and in the courses of advanced training and professional retraining, as well as in conducting scientific research in this direction.
About the Authors
M. I KatibovRussian Federation
Magomed I. Katibov — M.D., Dr.Sc.(M), Assoc. Prof. (Docent), Prof., Dept. of Urology, DSMU; Head, Urology Division, MCCH.
367018, Republic of Dagestan, Makhachkala, 89 Laptieva st.; 367012, Republic of Dagestan, Makhachkala, 1 V.I. Lenin sq.; tel.: +7 (8722) 55-36-85
Competing Interests: no conflicts of interest
A. B. Bogdanov
Russian Federation
Andrey B. Bogdanov — M.D., Cand.Sc.(M); Assoc. Prof. (Docent), Dept. of Urology and Surgical Andrology, RMA Continuous Professional Education; Urologist, Urology Division, Moscow S.P. Botkin CCH.
125284, Moscow, 5 2nd Botkinsky dr.; 125993, Moscow, 2/1 bld. 1 Barrikadnaya st.
Competing Interests: no conflicts of interest
References
1. Janjua HS, Lam SK, Gupta V, Krishna S. Congenital Anomalies of the Kidneys, Collecting System, Bladder, and Urethra. Pediatr Rev. 2019;40(12):619-626. DOI: 10.1542/pir.2018-0242
2. Barakat AJ, Gil Rushton H, eds. Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract. Clinical Implications in Children. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016. ISBN 978-3-319-29217-5
3. Fahmy M. Congenital Anomalies of the Penis. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. ISBN 978-3-319-43309-7
4. Hadidi AT, Azmy AF, eds. Hypospadias surgery: an illustrated guide. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2004. ISBN 9783-662-07843-3
5. Al-Salem AH. An Illustrated Guide to Pediatric Urology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. ISBN 978-3-319-44181-8
6. de Jesus LE, Pippi-Salle JL. Posterior Urethral Valves: Fetal and Neonatal Aspects. In: Lima M, Reinberg O, eds. Neonatal Surgery. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019:579-590. ISBN 978-3319-93532-4
7. Berrocal T, Lopez-Pereira P, Arjonilla A, Gutierrez J. Anomalies of the distal ureter, bladder, and urethra in children: embryologic, radiologic, and pathologic features. Radiographics. 2002;22(5):1139-64. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se101139
8. Ognerubov N.A., Огнерубова M.A. Atresia of urethra at adults: a case of practice. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Serija: Estestvennye i tehnicheskie nauki. 2015;20(6):1689-1692. (In Russ.).
9. Singh SK, Ansari M. Congenital anterior urethral diverticulum. Turk J Urol. 2014;40(3):182-4. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2014.95777
10. Levin TL, Han B, Little BP. Congenital anomalies of the male urethra. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37(9):851-62; quiz 945. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-007-0495-0
11. Costantino E, Ganesan GS. Paraurethral cysts in newborn girls. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:bcr2016216689. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2016-216689
12. Guglielmetti LC, Delcont M, Walker J, Wilcox D, Vuille-Dit-Bille RN. Urethral duplication-Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment in a case series of 19 patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(3):385.e1-385.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.02.010
13. Puri A, Pal DK. Congenital megalourethra: a case report of an isolated delayed presentation. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2016;28(1):115-7. DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2014-0065
14. Perez JF, Diaz B AM, Ramos GU, Peralta SR. Congenital Posterior Urethral Fistulae: Literature Review and Case Report. Urol Int. 2018;101(1):121-124. DOI: 10.1159/000486040
Review
For citations:
Katibov M.I., Bogdanov A.B. Congenital anomalies of the urethra. Urology Herald. 2021;9(1):131-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-1-131-147