Prostate cancer diagnosis: an immunological aspects
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-4-42-48
Abstract
Introduction. Contemporary diagnosis of prostate cancer is crucial to the patient’s further fate. Difficulties in the histological verification of the final diagnosis and false-negative results of biopsy research are often associated with the similarity of the prostate adenocarcinoma`s micromorphological picture and its benign lesions.
Purpose of the study. Comprehending the possibilities of immunohistochemical identification of tumor cells and the basal epithelial layer of prostate glandular structures in prostate cancer suspected cases.
Materials and methods. A biopsy material was taken from 134 patients. Prostate adenocarcinoma was verified by routine histological examination in 72 samples, in 62 samples there were no signs of malignant transformation. Subsequently, immunohistochemical analysis of biopsy specimens was performed using antibodies to α-methylacyl-CoA racemase, nuclear p63 protein and high-molecular cytokeratin.
Results. The AMACR-positive reaction of malignant cells and a negative reaction of the basal epithelium to nuclear p63 protein antibodies and high-molecular cytokeratin were detected during prostate adenocarcinoma.
Conclusion. If prostate cancer is suspected, immunohistochemical assays with monoclonal antibodies to AMACR, p63 and high-molecular cytokeratin greatly facilitate the detection of adenocarcinoma.
About the Authors
S. V. PopovRussian Federation
Sergey V. Popov – MD, PhD, DMS, Associate Professor; Head Doctor.
St. Petersburg.R. G. Guseinov
Russian Federation
Ruslan G. Guseynov – MD, Head, Urology Division №2.
St. Petersburg.
I. N. Orlov
Russian Federation
Igor N. Orlov – MD, PhD.
St. Petersburg.
V. V. Protoshchak
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Protoshchak – MD, PhD, DMS, Full Professor; Chief Urologist.
St. Petersburg.
O. N. Skryabin
Russian Federation
Oleg N. Scriabin – MD, PhD, DMS, Full Professor; Chief Oncologist; Scientific Head.
St. Petersburg.P. A. Babkin
Russian Federation
Pavel A. Babkin – MD, PhD, DMS, Full Professor; Professor, Urology Department.
St. Petersburg.
F. A. Bagrov
Russian Federation
Philip A. Bagrov – MD; Urologist.
St. Petersburg.
A. S. Katunin
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Katunin – MD; Urologist.
St. Petersburg.
A. G. Martov
Russian Federation
Alexey G. Martov – MD, PhD, DMS, Full Professor; Head, Urology Department.
Moscow.V. L. Schukin
Russian Federation
Viktor L. Schukin – MD; Urologist.
St. Petersburg.
References
1. Al-Shukri S.Kh., Borovets SY, Rybalov MA Errors of diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Urological statements. 2013;3(1):23-27. (in Russ.)
2. Herawi M, Parwani AV, Irie J, Epstein JI. Small Glandular Proliferations on Needle Biopsies, Most Common Benign Mimickers of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Sent in for Expert Second Opinion. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(7):874-880. PMID: 15958851
3. Pushkar DYu, Govorov AV. Prostate biopsy. M., “GEOTARMedia”, 2010. (in Russ.)
4. Singh V, Manu V1, Malik A, Dutta V, Mani NS, Patrikar S. Diagnostic utility of p63 and α-methyl acyl Co A racemase in resolving suspicious foci in prostatic needle biopsy and transurethral resection of prostate specimens. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10(3):686-92. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.138194
5. Iczkowski KA, Chen HM, Yang XJ, Beach RA. Prostate cancer diagnosed after initial biopsy with atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy is similar to cancer found on initial biopsy. Urology. 2002;60(5):851-854. PMID: 12429314
6. Molinié V, Fromont G, Sibony M, Vieillefond A, Vassiliu V, Cochand-Priollet B, Hervé JM, Lebret T, Baglin AC. Diagnos-tic utility of a p63/α-methyl coenzyme A racemase (p504s) cocktail in ambiguous lesions of the prostate upon needle biopsy. BJU Int. 2006;97(5):1109-1115. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800197
7. Dickinson SI. Premalignant And Malignant Prostate Lesions: 1. Pathologic Review. Cancer Control. 2010;17(4):214-22. DOI: 10.1177/107327481001700402
8. Hameed O, Humphrey PA. Pseudoneoplastic mimics of prostate and bladder carcinomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134(3):427-443. DOI: 10.1043/1543-2165-134.3.427
9. Kovylina MV. Tumor diseases of the urino-genital organs. Modern possibili???? es of histomorphologic evaluation of prostate biopsy specimens: the urgency of the problem. Oncourology. 2004;6(7). (in Russ.)
10. Kalantari MR, Anvari K, Jabbari H, Tabrizi FV. p63 is more sensitive and specifi c than 34βE12 to diff erentiate adeno carcinoma of prostate from cancer mimickers. Iran J. Basic Med. Sci. 2014;17(7):497-501. PMCID: PMC4242919
11. O’Malley FP, Grignon DJ, Shum DT. Usefulness of immunoperoxidase staining with high-molecular-weight cytokeratin in the diff erential diagnosis of small-acinar lesions of the prostate gland. Virchows Arch. A. Pathol. Anat. Histopathol. 1990;417:191-196. PMID: 1696762
12. Wojno KJ, Epstein JI. The utility of basal cell-specifi c anti- cytokeratin antibody (34 beta E12) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. A review of 228 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1995;19:251-260. PMID: 7532918
13. Signoretti S, Waltregny D, Dilks J, Isaac B, Lin D, Garraway L, Yang A, Montironi R, McKeon F, Loda M. p63 is a prostate basal cell marker and is required for prostate development. Am J Pathol. 2000;157(6):1769-1775. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64814-6
14. Barbareschi M, Pecciarini L, Cangi MG, Macrì E, Rizzo A, Viale G, Doglioni C. P63, a p53 homologue, is a selective nuclear marker of myoepithelial cells of the human breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(8):1054-1060. PMID: 11474290
15. Hameed O, Sublett J, Humphrey PA. Immunohistochemical stains for p63 and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase, versus a cocktail comprising both, in the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma: a comparison of the immunohistochemical staining of 430 foci in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy tissues. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005;29(5):579-587. PMID: 15832080
16. Beach R, Gown AM, De Peralta-Venturina MN, Folpe AL, Yaziji H, Salles PG, Grignon DJ, Fanger GR, Amin MB. P504S immunohistochemical detection in 405 prostatic specimens including 376 18-gauge needle biopsies. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2002;26(12):1588-1596. PMID: 12459625
17. Jiang Z, Woda BA, Rock KL, Xu Y, Savas L, Khan A, Pihan G, Cai F, Babcook JS, Rathanaswami P, Reed SG, Xu J, Fanger GR. P504S: a new molecular marker for the detection of prostate carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(11):1397-13404. PMID: 11684956
18. Yang XJ, Wu CL, Woda BA, Dresser K, Tretiakova M, Fanger GR, Jiang Z. Expression of alphamethylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S) in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(7):921-925. PMID: 12131160
19. Boran C, Kandirali E, Yilmaz F, Serin E, Akyol M. Reliability of the 34βE12, keratin 5/6, p63, bcl-2, and AMACR in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2011;29(6):614-623. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.11.013.
20. Jiang Z, Wu CL, Woda BA, Dresser K, Xu J, Fanger GR, Yang XJ. P504S/alphamethylacyl-CoA racemase: a useful marker for diagnosis of small foci of prostatic carcinoma on needle biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(9):1169-1174. PMID: 12218573
21. Zhou M, Jiang Z, Epstein JI. Expression and diagnostic utility of alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (P504S) in foamy gland and pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(6):772-778. PMID: 12766580
22. Farinola MA, Epstein JI. Utility of immunohistochemistry for alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase in distinguishing atrophic prostate cancer from benign atrophy. Hum Pathol. 2004;35(10):1272-1278. PMID: 15492996
23. Abrahams NA, Ormsby AH, Brainard J. Validation of cytokeratin 5/6 as an eff ective substitute for keratin 903 in the diff erentiation of benign from malignant glands in prostate needle. Histopathology. 2002;41(1):35-41. PMID: 12121235
24. Leite KR, Srougi M, Sanudo A, Dall’oglio MF, Nesrallah A, Antunes AA, Cury J, Camara-Lopes LH. The use of immunohistochemistry for diagnosis of prostate cancer. Int Braz J Urol. 2010;36(5):583-590. PMID: 21044375
Review
For citations:
Popov S.V., Guseinov R.G., Orlov I.N., Protoshchak V.V., Skryabin O.N., Babkin P.A., Bagrov F.A., Katunin A.S., Martov A.G., Schukin V.L. Prostate cancer diagnosis: an immunological aspects. Urology Herald. 2018;6(4):42-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-4-42-48