The clinical signifi cance of urethral sphincter hyperkinesis in the treatment of benign prosta???? c hyperplasia
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-4-5-12
Abstract
Introduction. Today there is many highly effective surgical approaches in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). New technologies in the treatment of BPH continue to be implemented. Despite this in some patients the results of surgical treatment for short-term and long-term monitoring is unsatisfactory.
Purpose of research. Тo improve the results of treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Materials and methods. The functional state of the urethral sphincter was studied in 123 patients with symptomatic BPH. According to the treatment method, all patients were separated into groups. Group 1 - patients with established standard indications for surgical treatment. After surgery, patients with persistent obstructive urination received therapy with a central muscle relaxant for three months. Group 2 - patients with uncomplicated BPH, having hypertonic urethral sphincter and receiving drug therapy according to the established urodynamic patterns.
Results. Our analysis of the efficacy of surgical treatment of patients with BPH demonstrates a significant correlation between negative outcomes of surgery for BPH with increased tone of the external urethral sphincter. So, in 70.1% of cases, symptomatic obstructive Low Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) in BPH were accompanied by increased tone of the urethral sphincter from standard parameters. We believe that these changes were related to the anatomical characteristics of nodular hyperplasia.
Conclusions. Exactly this fact, that these patients had urethral sphincter dysfunction in 14.5% of cases made for poor effect of surgical treatment of BPH. Use of muscle relaxants centrally acting drug therapy in these cases, significantly improves the urodynamics of lower urinary tract, which is accompanied by regression of LUTS.
About the Author
I. I. Belousov
Rostov State Medical University.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor I. Belousov – MD, PhD (M), DMS, Associate Professor (Docent); Professor, Department of Urology and Human Reproductive Health with the course of Pediatric Urologyandrology, Rostov State Medical University.
Rostov-on-Don.
References
1. Deering RE, Bigler SA, King J. Choongkittaworn M, Aramburu E, Brawer MK. Morphometric quantitation of stroma in human benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 1994;44(1):64-70. PMID: 7518983
2. Levin RM, Monson FC, Haugaard N, Buttyan R, Hudson A, Roelofs M, Sartore S, Wein AJ. Genetic and cellular characteris tics of bladder outlet obstruction. Urol. Clin. North Am. 1995;22(2):263-283. PMID: 7762110
3. Glybochko PV, Alyaev YG, Markosyan TG, Nikitin SS, Grigoryan VA, Arzumanyan EG. The role of the functional state of pelvic fl oor muscles and the corticospinal tract in urinati on disorders in prostate diseases. Urologiia. 2011;3:18-22. (In Russ.)
4. Taylor BC, Wilt TJ, Fink HA, Marshall LM, Hoff man AR, Beer TM, Bauer DC, Zmuda JM, Orwoll ES; Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Research Group. Prevalence, severity, and health correlates of lower urinary tract symptoms among older men: The MrOS study. Urology. 2006;68(4):804-809. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.04.019
5. Almeida FG, Freitas DG, Bruschini H. Is the ultrasoundes timated bladder weight a reliable method for evaluating bladder outlet obstruction? BJU Int. 2011;108(6):864-867. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09881.x
6. Xu D, Cui X, Qu C, Yin L, Wang C, Chen J. Urodynamic pattern distribution among aged male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruc tion. Urology. 2014;83(3);563-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.033
7. Sagnier PP, Macfarlane G, Teillac P, Botto H, Richard F, Boyle P. Impact of symptoms of prostatism on level bother and quality of life of men in the French community. J Urol. 1995;153(3 pt 1):669-673. PMID: 7532230
8. AUA Practice Guidelines Committee. AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2003;170(2 Pt 1):530-547. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000078083.38675.79
9. Loran OB, Vishnevsky EL, Kan YaD, Halimov ZM. The reasons for the persistence of urination disorders aft er adenomectomy. Abstracts of the All-Russian Plenum of the Scienfic Society of Urology. Kursk. 1993:117. (In Russ.)
10. D‘Silva KA, Dahm P, Wong CL. Does this man with lower urinary tract symptoms have bladder outlet obstruction?: The Rational Clinical Examination: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(5):535-542. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.5555
11. Kogan M, Belousov I. Clinical value of function urethral sphincter for surgical treatment BPH. “Improving Research for Common Future”. 3rd Scientifi c Symposium. Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne. Köln 2003. Аbstr. 75.
12. Abrams P, Chapple C, Khoury S, Roehrborn C, de la Rosette J; International Scientifi c Committee. Evaluation and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in older men. J Urol. 2009;181(4):1779-1787. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.127
13. Nitti VW. Appropriate workup for lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;6(5 Suppl 2):S141-142. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.12204
14. Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC, N’dow J, Nordling J, de la Rosette JJ; European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol. 2013;64(1):118-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.004
15. Kang M, Kim M, Choo MS, Bae J, Ku JH, Yoo C, Oh SJ. Associa tion of high bladder neck elevation with urodynamic bladder outlet obstruction in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 2014;84(6):1461-1466. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.037
16. Bulut S, Ozden C, Aktas BK, Deren T, Tagci S, Gokkaya CS, Baykam MM, Memis A. Eff ects of medical therapy or surgery on prostatic and bladder resistive indices in patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urol Int. 2015;94(2):181-186. DOI: 10.1159/000363581
17. Tubaro A, Carter S, Hind A, Vicentini C, Miano L. A prospective study of the safety and effi cacy of suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2001;166(1):172-176. PMID: 11435849
18. Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Barry MJ, et al. AUA Guideline on the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Linthicum, MD: American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.; 2006.
19. Lee Y-S, Lee HN, Han J-Y, Choo M-S, Lee I-S. Most bothersome symptom and symptom specifi c goal achievement in patients with BPO: a prospective open label study. J Urol. 2011;185(3):1003-1009. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.085
20. Steers WD, BarrettDM, Wein AJ. Voiding dysfunction: Diagnosis, classifi cation, and management. In Gillenwater JY, Grayhack JT, Howards SS, DuckettJWJr. eds. Adult and Pediatric Urology. Chicago. Year Book Medical Publishers. 1996:1220-1326.
21. Suhani, Gupta S, Gupta A, Saha S, Mahapatra L, Srivastava U. Outcome of surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia is it predictable? J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2859-2862. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/7606.3888
22. Cox L, Jaffe WI. Urodynamics in Male LUTS. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(3):399-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.04.009
23. DuBeau CE, Sullivan MP, Cravalho E, Resnick NM, Yalla SV. Correlation between micturitional urethral pressure profile and pressure-flow criteria in bladder outlet obstruction. J. Urol. 1995;154(2 Pt 1):498-503. PMID: 7541866
24. Roehrborn CG. Focus on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Nomenclature, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options. Highlights from the 5th International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, June 25–27, 2000, Paris, France. Rev Urol. 2001;3(3):139-145. PMID: 16985706
25. Fang Q, Song B, Li W, Lu G, Jin X, Zhang X, Fan R. Role of UPP in evaluating bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prosta tic enlargement. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(6);842-846. PMID 17565728
26. Litwin MS, McNaughton-Collins M, Fowler FJ, Nickel JC, Calhoun EA, Pontari MA, Alexander RB, Farrar JT, O’Leary MP. The National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index: development and validation of a new outcome measure. Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network. J. Urol. 1999;162(2):369-375. PMID: 10411041
27. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffi ths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-178. PMID: 11857671
28. Patent 2250748 Russian Federa???? on, IPC A 61 P 13/08. A method for the treatment of benign prosta???? c hyperplasia / Belousov II, Kogan MI; applicant and patentee Belousov II, Kogan MI – No. 2003115152/14; announced 21.05.03; published 04.27.05 Bulle???? n № 12. - 9 p. Available at: http://bd.patent.su/2250000-2250999/pat/servl/servlet7f12.html Accessed October 29, 2018.
29. Mundy AR, Thomas PJ. Clinical physiology of the bladder, urethra and pelvic fl oor. Urol. Clin. North Am. 1993;18:450-481.
Review
For citations:
Belousov I.I. The clinical signifi cance of urethral sphincter hyperkinesis in the treatment of benign prosta???? c hyperplasia. Urology Herald. 2018;6(4):5-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-4-5-12
Views:
1903
Email this article 
