PERINEAL RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-2-76-84
Abstract
Lecture is devoted to the main provisions of perineal prostatectomy. At present, laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy techniques have been widely developed. Nevertheless, the use of perineal access surgery remains indisputable for carefully selected patient groups. Undoubtedly, this type of intervention has obvious advantages, which are described amply in the lecture, in particular such as minimally invasive and economical expediency. The article presents modern functional and oncological results of perineal radical prostatectomy. This lecture will be useful for urologists and oncologists for improving their skills in performing this type of radical prostatectomy.
Disclosure: The study did not have sponsorship. The author have declared no conflicts of interest.
About the Author
E. A. Bezrukov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeny A. Bezrukov – MD, PhD (M), Professor at the Department of Urology
Chief of Urology Clinic n.a. R.M. Fronstein
tel.: +7(925)514-34-37
References
1. Adams J. The case of scirrhous of the prostate gland with corresponding affl icTIon of the lymphaTIc glands in the lumbar region and in the pelvis. Lancet. 1853:393.
2. Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate: being a study of 40 cases and presentaTIon of a radical operaTIon, which was carried out in four cases. 1905. J Urol. 2002;167:939-46.
3. Young HH. The cure of cancer of the prostate by radical perineal prostatectomy: history, literature and staTIsTIcs of Young’s operaTIon. J. Urol. 1945;53:188-256. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)70130-9
4. Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC. Radical prostatectomy with preservaTIon of sexual funcTIon: anatomical and pathological consideraTIons. Prostate. 1983;4(5):473-85.
5. Weiss JP, Schlecker BA, Wein AJ, Hanno PM. PreservaTIon of periprostaTIc autonomic nerves during total perineal prostatectomy by intrafascial dissecTIon. Urology. 1985;26(2):160-3.
6. Lepor H. A review of surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy. Rev Urol. 2005;7(2):11-7.
7. Li IK. Аnatomo-topografi cheskoe obosnovanie radikal’noj prostatehktomii i tazovoj limfadenehktomii iz promezhnostnogo dostupa [dissertaTIon]. Moscow, 2006. (in Russ.)
8. Fichtner J, Gillitzer R, Melchior SW, Hohenfellner M, Thüroff JW. Perineal complicaTIons following radical perineal. Aktuelle Urol. 2003;34(4):223-5. DOI: 10.1055/s2003-41599
9. Harris MJ. Radical perineal prostatectomy: cost effi cient, outcome eff ecTIve, minimally invasive prostate cancer management. Eur Urol. 2003;44(3):303-8.
10. Bishoff JT, Motley G, Optenberg SA, Stein CR, Moon KA, Browning SM, Sabanegh E, Foley JP, Thompson IM. Incidence of fecal and urinary inconTInence following radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy in a naTIonal populaTIon. J Urol. 1998;160(2):454-8.
11. Sammon JD, Trinh QD, Sukumar S, Ravi P, Friedman A, Sun M, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Jeong W, Mander N, Peabody JO, Karakiewicz PI, Harris M. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: A detailed assessment of margin extent and location. Urol Oncol. 2013;31(8):1470-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.03.013
Review
For citations:
Bezrukov E.A. PERINEAL RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. Urology Herald. 2018;6(2):76-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-2-76-84
Views:
3829
Email this article 
