Preview

Urology Herald

Advanced search

CHANGES IN BIOLOGY OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: COMPARISON OF TWO DECADES IN ONE HEALTH CENTER

https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-1-20-25

Abstract

Introduction. Epidemiological studies noted a progressive increase in the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Despite the improvement in radiation diagnosis of RCC, the number of primary metastatic forms and number of secondary progressive forms after radical surgical treatment remains high with no apparent downward trend. This may be due to changes in the biology of RCC, which is expressed in the increasing aggressiveness of the tumor tissue. However, studies on the biological characteristics of the change in tumor for a long period of time is very small.

Objective. To evaluate and compare the profiles of patients with RCC, the morphological characteristics of renal tumors, the options for surgical treatment and its results in two consecutive decades.

Materials and methods. The study included 306 operated and monitored patients with RCC. The patients were divided into two groups: 1 group - 149 patients treated from 1996 to 2005 and 2 group - 157 patients treated from 2006 op 2015. The group analyzed the profiles of patients and morphological characteristics of the tumor.

Results. In patients of the group 2, tumors >4 cm were characterized by a lower degree of tissue differentiation (G2-G3) compared to the group 1 (54.54% vs. 48.57%) and T3a (60% vs. 42.26%). A similar difference was noted for tumors measuring 4-7 cm (G2-G3 - 67.69% vs. 57.75%, T3a - 79.54% vs. 32.15%). Tumors of the group2 in the stages Tla, Tib, T2 and T3a are less frequent had a high degree of differentiation (Gl) in comparison with tumors of similar stages of group 1 (52.17% vs. 59.26%, 35.71% vs. 58.06%, 11.11% vs. 18.75% and 12.12% vs. 28%, respectively.) In the group 2, regional and distant metastasis was noted more often than in group 1 (34.6% vs. 20.33%). Survival in group 2 decreased in comparison with group 1 (3-year-old: total - 78.37% vs. 83.02%, oncological - 81.43% vs. 87.15%, 5-year-old: total - 73.86% vs. 79.21%, oncological - 78.69% vs. 83.91% ).

Conclusions. The comparative analysis showed an increase in aggressive tumor potential in group 2 compared to group 1.

About the Authors

A. A. Gusev
Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation


S. V. Evseev
Railway Clinical Hospital at the st. Rostov-Glavniy JSC «Russian Railways»
Russian Federation


Z. M. Akhokhov
City Emergency Hospital Taganrog
Russian Federation


References

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56(2):106-30.

2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(l):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332

3. Lindblad P. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Surg. 2004;93(2):88-96. doi: 10.1177/145749690409300202

4. Ljungberg B, Campbell SC, Choi HY, Jacqmin D, Lee JE, et al. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):615-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.049

5. Campbell SC, Lane BR. Malignant renal tumors. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10thed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2012:1413-74.

6. Gudbjartsson T, Thoroddsen A, Petursdottir V, Hardarson S, Magnusson J, Einarsson GV. Effect of incidental detection for survival of patient with renal cell carcinoma: results of population-based study of 701 patient. Urology. 2005;66(6):1186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.009

7. Sivaramakrishna B, Gupta NP, Wadhwa P, Hemal AK, Dogra PN et al. Pattern of metastases in renal cell carcinoma: A single institution study. Indian J Cancer. 2005;42(4):173-7.

8. Gusev AA, Medvedev VL, Shangichev AV, Pasechnik DG, Kogan Ml. Evaluation of the natural history of incidental and symptomatic renal-cell carcinoma after radical surgery. Cancer Urology. 2006;(4):18-24. (in Russ.)

9. Gu L, Ма X, Li H, Chen L, Xie Y et al. Comparison of oncologic outcomes between partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol. 2016;25(4):385-393. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2016.09.001.

10. Ray RP, Mahapatra RS, KhullarS, Pal DK, Kundu AK. Clinical characteristics of renal cell carcinoma: Five years review from a tertiary hospital in Eastern India. Indian J Cancer. 2016;53(l):114-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.180851

11. Kabaria R, Klaassen Z, Terris MK. Renal cell carcinoma: links and risks. IntJ Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2016;9:45-52. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S75916


Review

For citations:


Gusev A.A., Evseev S.V., Akhokhov Z.M. CHANGES IN BIOLOGY OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: COMPARISON OF TWO DECADES IN ONE HEALTH CENTER. Urology Herald. 2017;5(1):20-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-1-20-25

Views: 3563


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-6424 (Online)