Delayed complications of radical cystectomy considering urinary diversion methods: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and cancer with minimal muscle invasion
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2026-14-1-71-82
Abstract
Introduction. Radical cystectomy (RC) effectively controls bladder cancer but carries a > 50% 90-day complication rate, 15 – 20% severe complications, and 2% mortality. Most short- and long-term complications relate to urinary diversion rather than RC itself.
Objective. To evaluate the incidence and profile of delayed postoperative complications following RC by urinary diversion method in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and minimal intradetrusor-invasive muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Materials & methods. This study included 49 patients with high-risk progressive NMIBC (group 1) and 102 with MIBC exhibiting minimal intradetrusor invasion (group 2) who underwent RC.
Results. Delayed complications occurred in 10.9 ± 4.9 (group 1) versus 12.1 ± 3.5 cases per 100 patients (group 2; no significant difference). Diversion-related complications were 5.5 times more frequent than non-diversion-related ones. Proportions of affected patients were similar (39.1% vs 39.4%), but case prevalence was higher in group 2 (71.7 ± 8.5 vs 60.9 ± 11.5 per 100; p > 0.05). Internal diversion showed the highest risk (266.7 ± 66.7 per 100), while inverted ileocystoplasty was most favourable (34.8 ± 12.3 per 100). Bricker diversion had the lowest corrective surgery rate (6.3 ± 4.4 per 100).
Conclusion. Delayed diversion-related and urological complications were more prevalent in minimal MIBC, with higher corrective surgeries in NMIBC. Internal diversion performed poorly, whereas orthotopic inverted ileocystoplasty offered optimal outcomes.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. A. KhomyakovRussian Federation
Vladimir A. Khomyakov
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
The article underwent the journal's standard peer-review process by independent experts. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest and report no relationships, activities, or interests over the past three years involving third parties (commercial or non-commercial) that could influence — or be perceived to influence — the content of this article
O. N. Vasilyev
Russian Federation
Oleg N. Vasilyev — Dr.Sc.(Med), Assoc.Prof. (Docent)
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
The article underwent the journal's standard peer-review process by independent experts. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest and report no relationships, activities, or interests over the past three years involving third parties (commercial or non-commercial) that could influence — or be perceived to influence — the content of this article
V. A. Perepechay
Russian Federation
Vadim A. Perepechay — Dr.Sc.(Med), Assoc.Prof. (Docent)
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
The article underwent the journal's standard peer-review process by independent experts. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest and report no relationships, activities, or interests over the past three years involving third parties (commercial or non-commercial) that could influence — or be perceived to influence — the content of this article
A. V. Ilyash
Russian Federation
Anna V. Ilyash — Cand.Sc.(Med)
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
Author Anna V. Iliash is a member of the Editorial board of Urology Herald.
M. G. Loskutov
Russian Federation
Mikhail G. Loskutov
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
The article underwent the journal's standard peer-review process by independent experts. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest and report no relationships, activities, or interests over the past three years involving third parties (commercial or non-commercial) that could influence — or be perceived to influence — the content of this article
B. G. Amirbekov
Russian Federation
Beykes G. Amirbekov
Rostov-on-Don
Competing Interests:
The article underwent the journal's standard peer-review process by independent experts. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest and report no relationships, activities, or interests over the past three years involving third parties (commercial or non-commercial) that could influence — or be perceived to influence — the content of this article
References
1. Khetrapal P, Wong JKL, Tan WP, Rupasinghe T, Tan WS, Williams SB, Boorjian SA, Wijburg C, Parekh DJ, Wiklund P, Vasdev N, Khan MS, Guru KA, Catto JWF, Kelly JD. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol. 2023;84(4):393-405. Erratum in: Eur Urol. 2023;84(4):e98-e99. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004
2. Tinoco CL, Lima E. Urinary diversions for radical cystectomy: a review of complications and their management. Mini-invasive Surg. 2021;5:28. DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2021.35
3. Shimko MS, Tollefson MK, Umbreit EC, Farmer SA, Blute ML, Frank I. Long-term complications of conduit urinary diversion. J Urol. 2011;185(2):562-567. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.096
4. Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG. 25 years of experience with 1,000 neobladders: long-term complications. J Urol. 2011;185(6):2207- 2212. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.006
5. Abusal F, Alawadi A, Akpala A, Obeidat S, Al-Omari N, Alsharief M, Shalaby A, Shaukat Z, Sarkar D. Long-Term Complications and Quality of Life After Urinary Diversion for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2025;17(5):e84744. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.84744
6. Rai BP, Bondad J, Vasdev N, Adshead J, Lane T, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Guru K, Chlosta PL, Aboumarzouk OM. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4(4):CD011903. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011903.pub2
7. Wilson TG, Guru K, Rosen RC, Wiklund P, Annerstedt M, Bochner BH, Chan KG, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Murphy D, Novara G, Peabody JO, Palou Redorta J, Skinner EC, Thalmann G, Stenzl A, Yuh B, Catto J; Pasadena Consensus Panel. Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):363-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.009
8. Presicce F, Leonardo C, Tuderti G, Brassetti A, Mastroianni R, Bove A, Misuraca L, Anceschi U, Ferriero M, Gallucci M, Simone G. Late complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion. World J Urol. 2021;39(6):1903-1909. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03378-7
9. Madersbacher S, Schmidt J, Eberle JM, Thoeny HC, Burkhard F, Hochreiter W, Studer UE. Long-term outcome of ileal conduit diversion. J Urol. 2003;169(3):985-990. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000051462.45388.14
10. Wood DP Jr, Bianco FJ Jr, Pontes JE, Heath MA, DaJusta D. Incidence and significance of positive urine cultures in patients with an orthotopic neobladder. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2196-2199. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067909.98836.91
11. Vasilyev O.N., Perepechay V.A., Ryzhkin A.V. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: early and late postoperative complications. Urology Herald. 2019;7(2):24-50. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2019-7-2-24-50
12. Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wang LC, Nguyen DP, Rieken M, Lee RK, Lee DJ, Flynn T, Chrystal J, Shariat SF, Scherr DS. Is continent cutaneous urinary diversion a suitable alternative to orthotopic bladder substitute and ileal conduit after cystectomy? BJU Int. 2015;116(5):805-814. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12919
13. Pattou M, Baboudjian M, Pinar U, Parra J, Rouprêt M, Karsenty G, Phe V. Continent cutaneous urinary diversion with an ileal pouch with the Mitrofanoff principle versus a Miami pouch in patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a comparative study. World J Urol. 2022;40(5):1159-1165. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03954-z
14. Igel DA, Chestnut CJ, Lee EK. Urinary diversion and reconstruction following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a narrative review. AME Med J. 2021;6:4. DOI: 10.21037/amj-20-76
Review
For citations:
Khomyakov V.A., Vasilyev O.N., Perepechay V.A., Ilyash A.V., Loskutov M.G., Amirbekov B.G. Delayed complications of radical cystectomy considering urinary diversion methods: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and cancer with minimal muscle invasion. Urology Herald. 2026;14(1):71-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2026-14-1-71-82
JATS XML





































