DIAGNOSTICS SEGMENT PYELOURETERAL OBSTRUCTION IN CHILDREN
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-4-56-120
Abstract
The lecture shows in detail recent advances in basic research on the problem of congenital obstruction of the upper urinary tract, refined current diagnostic algorithms to quickly identify the types of obstruction pyeloureteral segments that are a potential threat of kidney function and require execution pyeloplasty.
References
1. Детская хирургия: национальное руководство / под ред. Ю.Ф.Исакова. – М.: ГЕОТАР - Медиа,2009. -1168 с.
2. Pediatric Surgery/ edited by A. G. Coran, A. Caldamone, N. S. Adzick[et al]. - 7th Edition-Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012.-848p.
3. Campbell-Walsh Urology / edited by J.A.Wein,L.R. Kavoussi, A.W. Partin A. [et al.]. -11th Edition.- Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016. - 4176 p.
4. Koff S.A. Pathophysiology of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Clinical and experimental observations / S.A. Koff // Uro.l. Clin. North Am.- 1990.- Vol.17.-P. 263-272.
5. Tulp N. Observationes medicae / N. Tulp. - Apud D. Elsevirium, 1672. - 392 p.
6. АшкрафтK.E.Детская хирургия: в 3т. Т 2/ К.Е. Ашкрафт., Т.М. Холдер.– СПб., 1997.- 387 с.
7. Murphy LJT: The History of Urology / C.C. Thomas. - Springfield, III, 1997. – 197 p.
8. Surgical Diseases of the Kidney and Ureter: Vol. 1 of 2. /Morris. –Forgotten Books, 1902. - 406р.
9. Douglas R. Surgical diseases of abdomen. / R. Douglas –Philadelphia: P. Blakiston`s son & co, 1909. – 517р.
10. Заболевания почек и мочевых путей / под ред. Пытель Ю.А.- М., 1969.- 712 с.
11. Albarran J. L'hypertrophie compensatrice en pathologie rénale /J. Albarran // Presse. Med.-1899.- Vol. 7. - P.85—87.
12. Hinman F. Experemental hydronephrosis: Repaer following ureterocystostomy in white rats with complete ureteral obstruction/ F. Hinman //J. Urol.-1919.-Vol.3. - P.147-152.
13. Hinman F. Experimental hydronephrosis: the effect of changes in blood pressure and in blood flow on its rate of development ii. Partial Obstruction of the Renal Artery: Diminished Blood Flow; Diminished Intrarenal Pressure and Oliguria/ F. Нinman, A.B. Hepler// Arch. Surg., 1925. - Vol.11, №.5.- P. 649-659.
14. Donald I. Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound/ I. Donald, J. Macvicar, T.G. Brown // Lancet. – 1958. – Vol. 7,№1. - P.1188-1195.
15. Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction / S.A. Capello, B.A. Kogan, L.J. Giorgi[et al.] //J. Urol.- 2005. –Vol. 174, №4, Pt. 1.- P. 1425-1428.
16. Are modern imaging techniques over diagnosing ureteropelvic junction obstruction /J.S. Wiener, G.K. Emmert, H.G.Mesrobian [et al.]//J. Urol.- 1995.- Vol.154,№2, Pt. 2.-P. 659-661.
17. Postnatal diagnosis and outcome of urinary tract abnormalities detected by antenatal ultrasound /J.C.Tam, E.M.Hodson, K.K.Choong [et al.] // Med. J. Aust. – 1994. – Vol.160. – P.633-637.
18. Does early detection of ureteropelvic junction obstruction improve surgical outcome in terms of renal function?/B. Chertin,A. Fridmans, M. Kniznik [et al.]//J. Urol.- 1999.-P.1037-1040.
19. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis /H.T. Nguyen, C.D. Herndon, C. Cooper [et al.]//Journal of Pediatric Urology.- Vol. 6, № 3.-P.212 – 231.
20. Incidence, diagnosis and treatment of children's congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract detected in ultrasound screening / B.Zhang, H.Wang, N.Sun[et al.]// Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi.–2011. – Vol.49,№ 7.-P.534-538.
21. ParkJ.M. The pathophysiology of UPJ obstruction. Current concepts /J.M. Park, D.A. Bloom //Urol. Clin. North. Am. – 1998.-Vol.25, №2.-P.161-169.
22. Mutations in 12 known dominant disease-causing genes clarify many congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract /D-Y. Hwang, G.C. Dworschak, S. Kohl [et al.] //Kidney international. –2014- Vol.85, №6.- P.1429-1433.
23. Niedzielski J.K. Innervation of narrowed segment of upper ureter in children with ureteropelvic junction obstraction / J.K. Niedzielski // J. Pediatric Surg. -2005.- Vol.40.-P.1219.
24. Ureteralstructureandultrastructure: PartII. Congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction and primary obstructive megaureter / M.K. Hanna, R.D. Jeffs, J.M. Sturgess [et al.]// J. Urol.- 1976. – Vol. 116.-P.725-730.
25. SeremetisG.M.TGF-betam RNA expression in the renal pelvis after experimental and clinical ureteropelvic junction obstruction /G.M. Seremetis, M. Maizels// J. Urol.- 1996. - Vol.156. - P.261-266.
26. Roleofangiotensininthecongenitalanomaliesofthekidneyandurinarytract in the mouse and the human / E. Yerkes, H. Nishimura, Y. Miyazaki [et al.]//KidneyInt.67. - 1998. – P.75-77
27. How They Begin and How They End /J.C. Pope, J.W. Broch, M.C. Adams[et al.] // J.Am.Soc.Nephrol. - 1999. – Vol.10. - P.2018-2028.
28. Chen F.Genetic and Developmental Basis for Urinary Tract Obstruction / F. Chen // Pediatric nephrology. – 2009. – Vol.24, № 4. – P. 1621–1632.
29. Microanatomy and morphometry of the "obstructed" renal pelvis in asymptomatic infants / N.T. Starr, M. Maizels, P. Chou[et al.]// J. Urol. – 1992.–Vol.148, № 2, Pt. 2. – P.519-24.
30. Structural changes of collagen components and diminution of nerves in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction /M. Murakumo, K. Nonomura K, T. Yamashita[et al.]// J. Urol. – 1997. –Vol. 157, № 5. – P.1963-1968.
31. Collagen studies for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction /J.Y. Yoon, J.C. Kim, T.K. Hwang[et al.] //Urology. – 1998.-Vol. 52, №3. - P.494-497.
32. Collagen-to-smooth muscle ratio helps prediction of prognosis after pyeloplasty /W.J. Kim, S.J. Yun, T.S. Lee[et al.]// J. Urol. – 2000. –Vol. 163, № 4. – P.1271-1275.
33. Structural changes of smooth muscle in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction /M. Hosgor, I. Karaca, C. Ulukus[et al.]//J. Pediatr. Surg. – 2005. - Vol. 40, № 10. – P.1632-1636.
34. Structural alterations of the smooth muscle and of the EGFR expression and Ckit in congenital pyeloureteral stenosis. Relationship with its pathogenesis / Cruz V. Vargas, A. García Ceballos, C. Ruiz Hierro[et al.]// Cir. Pediatr. - 2010. – Vol. 23, № 2. – P.82-87.
35. The roles of extracellular matrix proteins, apoptosis and c-kit positive cells in the pathogenesis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction / S.K. Özel, H. Emir, S. Dervişoğlu[et al.]// J. Pediatr. Urol. - 2010. –Vol. 6, №2. – P.125-129.
36. Aberrant differentiation of urothelial cells in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction / T. Hou, X. Yang, B. Hai[et al.]// J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. int. – 2014. –Vol.15, №9. – P.5837-5845.
37. Solari V. Altered expression of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction / V. Solari, A.P. Piotrowska, P. Puri //J. Urol. – 2003. – Vol.70. – P. 2420–2422.
38. Yang X. The expression of Cajal cells at the obstruction site of congenital pelviureteric junction obstruction and quantitative image analysis /X. Yang, Y.Zhang, J.Hu// J. Pediatr. Surg. – 2009. – Vol.44, №12. – P.2339-2342.
39. Changes in interstitial cell of Cajal-like cells density in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction / P. Koleda,W. Apoznanski, Z.Wozniak[et al.] // Urol. Nephrol. Int. – 2012. – Vol.44, №1. – P.7-12.
40. The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction / W. Apoznanski, P. Koleda, Z. Wozniak[et al.] // Urol. Nephrol. Int. - 2013. – Vol.45, № 3. – P. 607-612.
41. Smooth muscle cell apoptosis and defective neural development in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction / A.M. Kajbafzadeh, S. Payabvash, A.H. Salmasi[et al.]// J. Urol. – 2006. – Vol.176, № 2. – P. 718-723.
42. The roles of extracellular matrix proteins, apoptosis and c-kit positive cells in the pathogenesis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction / S.K. Özel, H. Emir, S. Dervişoğlu [et al.]//J. Pediatr. Urol. - 2010. – Vol.6, № 2. - P.125-129.
43. Extracellular matrix degradation and reduced neural density in children with intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction /C. Kaya, G. Bogaert,D. de Ridder[et al.]// Urology. - 2010. - Vol.76, № 1. – P.185-189.
44. Zeltser I.S.The incidence of crossing vessels in patients with normal ureteropelvic junction examined with endoluminal ultrasound / I.S. Zeltser, J.B. Liu, D.H. Bagley // J. Urol. - 2004.- Vol.172, Issue 6. – P.2304-2307.
45. Sampaio F. J. Renal artery: anatomic study for surgical and radiological practice / F.J. Sampaio, M.A. Possos // Surg. Radiol. Anat.-1992.–Vol. 14. – P. 113-117.
46. Functional assessment of crossing vessels as etiology of ureteropelvic junction obstruction/J.M. Stern, S.Park, J.K. Anderson[et al.]// Urology. – 2007. – Vol.69, № 6. – P.1022-1024.
47. Stewart H.H. A new operation for the treatment of hydronephrosis in association with a lower polar (or aberrant) artery / H.H. Stewart // British Journal of Surgery.-1947.- Vol.35,№ 137. – P.51-57.
48. The absence of crossing vessels in association with ureteropelvic junction obstruction detected by prenatal ultrasonography /J.H. Ross, R. Kay, N.C. Knipper[et al.]//J. Urol. – 1998. – Vol.160. – P.973-975.
49. Ureteropelvicjunctionobstructioninchildren: twovariantsofthesamecongenitalanjmaly? /H.P. BragaLuis, A. Liard, B. Bachy[et al.]// InternationalBraz.J.Urol. -2003. – Vol. 29, № 6. –P.528-534.
50. RooksV.J.Extrinsicureteropelvicjunctionobstructionfromacrossingrenalvessel: demographyandimaging /V.J. Rooks, R.L. Lebowitz // Pediatr. Radiol. - 2001.–Vol. 31, № 2. – P.120-124.
51. Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcomee: a meta-analysis / R.S. Lee, M. Cendron, D.D. Kinnamon [et al.]// Pediatrics. - 2006. – Vol.118, № 2. – P.586-593.
52. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis / H.T. Nguyen, C.D. Herndon, C. Cooper[et al.]// J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2010. –Vol.6, № 3. –P.212-231.
53. Sargent M.A. What is the normal prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux? /M.A. Sargent // Pediatr.Radiol. - 2000. – Vol. 30, № 9. – P.587-593.
54. Fernbach S.K.Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology / S.K. Fernbach, M. Maizels, J.J. Conway// Pediatr. Radiol. – 1993. – Vol.23, № 6. – P.478-480.
55. Onen A. An alternative grading system to refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis and optimal treatment guidelines in neonates with primary UPJ-type hydronephrosis / A. Onen // J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2007. – Vol.3, № 3. – P.200-205.
56. Dhillon H.K. Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the Great Ormond Streetexperience. / H.K. Dhillon //Br. J. Urol. – 1998.–Vol. 81,(Suppl. 20). - P.39-44.
57. Antenatallydetected pelviureteric junction obstruction. Is non-operation safe? / N.P. Madden, D.F. Thomas, A.C. Gordon[et al.]// Br. J. Urol. – 1991. – Vol. 68, № 3. - P.305-310.
58. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system) / H.T. Nguyen, C.B. Benson, B. Bromley [et al.] // J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2014. – Dec. – Vol. 10, № 6. – P.982-998.
59. Diagnostic accuracy of renal pelvic dilatation for detecting surgically managed ureteropelvic junction obstruction / C.S. Dias, J.M. Silva, A.K. Pereira[et al.]// J. Urol. – 2013. – Vol.190, № 2. –P.661-666.
60. CrooksK.K.Gianthydronephrosisinchildren / K.K.Crooks, W.H. Hendren, R.C. Pfister//J.Pediatr.Surg. – 1979. – Vol. 14, № 6. – P.844-850.
61. HuG.Giant hydronephrosis secondary to ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults: report of a case and review of literatures / G. Hu, M. Luo, Y. Xu // International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. – 2015. – Vol. 8, № 3. – P. 4715-4717.
62. Prenatal diagnosis of unilateral hydronephrosis with early postnatal obstruction / J. Mandell, H.W. Kinard, C.A. Mittlestoedi[et al.]// J. Urol. – 1984. – Vol. 132, № 2. - P.3003-3307.
63. Valayer J.Hydronephrosis due to pelviureteric janction in infancy / J.Valayer, G. Adda // J. Pediatric Surg. – 1976. – Vol. 11. – P.57-60.
64. Кучера Я. Хирургия гидронефроза и уретерогидронефроза / Я.Кучера. - Прага.: Государственное издательство медицинской литературы, 1963.-221 с.
65. Giant hydronephrosis due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A rare case report, and a review of the literature /Q-F.Wang, G. Zeng, L. Zhong [et al.]//Molecular and Clinical Oncology. - 2016. – Vol. 5, № 1. - P.19-22.
66. Metcalfe P.D.Symptomatic versus asymptomatic pyeloplasties: A single institution review / P.D. Metcalfe, M. Assmus, D. Kiddoo// Canadian Urological Association Journal. - 2014 – Vol. 8. – P. 428-431.
67. Shokeir A.A. Renal colic: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment / A.A. Shokeir //Eur. Urol. – 2001. – Vol.39. - P.241-249.
68. Сизонов В.В.Роль конфликтного сосуда в обструкции пиелоуретерального сегмента у детей /В.В. Сизонов, М.И. Коган //Детская хирургия. – 2011. - №6. – С. 25-29.
69. Belman A.B. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction as a cause for intermittent abdominal pain in children / A.B. Belman // Pediatrics. – 1991. – Vol. 88. –P. 1066-1069.
70. Detection of crossing vessels in pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Clinical patterns and imaging findings / A.D. Weiss, S. Kadakia, R. Kurzweil[et al.]// Journal of Pediatric Urology. – 2015. - Vol.11, № 4. – P.173-173.
71. Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary in infants with obstructive hydronephrosis? /S.H. Song, S.B. Lee, Y.S. Park[et al.]//J.Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 177, № 3. – P.1098-1101.
72. Nonrefluxing neonatal hydronephrosis and the risk of urinary tract infection / J.H. Lee, H.S. Choi, J.K. Kim [et al.]// J. Urol. - 2008. – Vol. 179, № 4. – P.1524-1528.
73. Zareba P.Risk factors for febrile urinary tract infection in infants with prenatal hydronephrosis: comprehensive single center analysis / P. Zareba, A.J. Lorenzo, L.H. Braga //J. Urol. - 2014. –Vol. 191, № 5. – P.1614-1618.
74. Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections in antenatal hydronephrosis /L.H. Braga, H. Mijovic, F. Farrokhyar[et al.]// Pediatrics. – 2013. – Vol.131, № 1. – P.251-261.
75. Clinical significance of primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary antibiotic prophylaxis after acute pyelonephritis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study /E.H. Garin, F. Olavarria, V. Garcia Nieto[et al.] //Pediatrics. -2006. –Vol. 117. – P. 626-632.
76. . Prophylaxis after first febrile urinary tract infection in children? A multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial /G. Montini, L. Rigon, P. Zucchetta[et al.]// Pediatrics. – 2008. –Vol. 122. - P. 1064-1071.
77. Antibiotic prophylaxis and recurrent urinary tract infection in children /J.C. Craig, J.M. Simpson, G.J. Williams[et al.]// N. Engl. J. Med. - 2009. – Vol. 361. - P.1748-1759.
78. Revised guidelines on management of antenatal hydronephrosis /A. Sinha, A. Bagga, A. Krishna [et al.] // Indian Journal of Nephrology. - 2013. – Vol. 23, № 2. – P.83-97.
79. Urinary tract infections in children: EAU/ESPU / R. Stein, H.S. Dogan, P. Hoebeke [et al.] // Eur. Urol. - 2015. – Vol. 67, № 3. – P. 546-558.
80. Ureteropelvic obstruction in children: Experiences with 109 cases / P.P. Kelalis, O.S. Culp, G.B. Stickler [et al.] // J. Urol. – 1971. – Vol. 106. – P.418-422.
81. Williams D.I.The prognosis of pelviureteric obstruction in childhood: A review of 190 cases / D.I. Williams, M.M. Kenawi // Eur. Urol. – 1976. –Vol. 2. – P.57-63.
82. AhmadAlShare. Гидрокаликонефроз у детей: особенности диагностики и лечения: дис. … док. мед:AhmadAlShare. – Кишинев, 2007.-111 с.
83. Barratt T.M. Pediatric Nephrology /T.M. Barratt, E.D. Avner, W.E. Harmon, - 4th ed. - Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1999. – P. 1010.
84. Hypertension is an indication for surgery in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction /D. Waard, P. Dik, M.R. Lilien [et al.] // J.Urol. - 2008. – Vol. 179, № 5. – P.1976-1978.
85. Дворяковский И.В.Эхография внутренних органов у детей / И.В.Дворяковский. – М.: Рос. ассоц. врачей ультразвуковой диагностики в перинатологии и гинекологии, 1994. – 455 с.
86. Postnatal management of infants with antenatally detected hydronephrosis / N. Aksu, O. Yavaşcan, M. Kangin[et al.] // Pediatr. Nephrol. - 2005. – Vol. 20, № 9. – P.1253-1259.
87. Wiener J.S.Optimal timing of initial postnatal ultrasonography in newborns with prenatal hydronephrosis /J.S. Wiener, S.M. O'Hara // J. Urol. – 2002. – Vol.168,№4, Pt. 2. - 1826-1829.
88. Postnatal investigation and outcome of isolated fetal renal pelvis dilatation /P. Masson, G. De Luca, N. Tapia [et al.] //Arch. Pediatr. - 2009. – Vol.16, № 8. – P.1103-1110.
89. Dias C.S.Diagnostic accuracy of renal pelvic dilatation for detecting surgically managed ureteropelvic junction obstruction /C.S. Dias, J.M. Silva, A.K. Pereira [et al] // J. Urol. - 2013. – Vol. 190, (Suppl. 2). – P.661-666.
90. Dhillon H.K. Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the Great Ormond Street experience / H.K. Dhillon// Br. J. Urol. – 1998. – Vol.81, № 2. - P.39-44.
91. Postnatal management of antenatally diagnosed ureteropelvic junction obstruction / A.Ismail, A. Elkholy, O. Zaghmout [et al.] // J. Ped. Urol. - 2006. –Vol. 2. –P.163-168.
92. Imaji R.Calyx to parenchyma ratio in pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction / R. Imaji, P.A. Dewan // BJU Int. - 2002. – Vol. 89,№ 1. - P.73-77.
93. Evaluation of sonographic renal parenchymal area in the management of hydronephrosis /L.V.Rodríguez, J. Lock, W.A. Kennedy [et al.] // J.Urol. – 2001. – Vol. 165,№ 2. – P.548-551.
94. Ramesh B. Pelvis/cortex ratio: A sonographic marker of pelvi ureteric junction obstruction in children /B. Ramesh, V.V Sai// Indian J. Urol. – 2010. – Vol. 26, № 4. – P. 494–496.
95. Ларионов И.И.Диуретическое УЗИ почек у детей – новый метод диагностики обструкции лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента / И. И. Ларионов, А.И. Демин, В.М. Кузнецов // VIII Всероссийский съезд урологов. –Свердловск, 1988. - С.136.
96. Diagnostic accuracy of color Doppler sonographic study of the ureteric jets in evaluation of hydronephrosis / J.Jr. Bessa, F.T. Dénes, M.C. Chammas[et al.] // J. Pediatr. Urol. - 2008. –Vol. 4, № 2. - P. 113-117.
97. PalmerJ.M.Diuretic Enhanced Duplex Doppler Sonography in 33 Children Presenting with Hydronephrosis: A Study of Test Sensitivity, Specificity and Precision/J.M.Palmer, M. DiSandro// J.Urol. - 1995. –Vol. 154, № 5. –P.1885-1888.
98. Renal diuretic duplex Doppler sonography in childhood hydronephrosis /D. Akata, M. Haliloglu, M. Caglar [et al.] // Acta. Radiol.- 1999. – Vol. 40, № 2. – P. 203-206.
99. Liepe K. Canrenal doppler sonography replace diuretic radionuclide renography in infants with hydronephrosis?/ K. Liepe, H. Taut-Sack//Turk.J.Pediatr. – 2006. –Vol. 48, № 3. – P.221-227.
100. Consensus on diuresis renographyfor investigating the dilated upper urinary tract / P. O,Reilly, M. Aurell, K. Britton [et al.] //J.Nucl.Med. – 1996. –Vol. 37, №11 - P.1872-1876.
101. Gordon I.Auspices of Paediatric Committee of European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Guidelines for standard and diuretic renogram in children /I. Gordon, A. Piepsz, R. Sixt // Eur.J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. – 2011. – Vol. 38, № 6. – P.1175-1188.
102. Shulkin B.L.Procedure guideline for diuretic renography in children 3.0. /B.L Shulkin, G.A. Mandell, J.A. Cooper [et al.] // J. Nucl. Med. Technol. - 2008. – Vol. 36, № 3. - P.162-168.
103. Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of renal function obtained from renogram: International Consensus Committee from the Scientific Committee of Radionuclides in Nephrourology / A.Prigent, P. Cosgriff, G.F. Gates [et al.] // Semin. Nucl. Med. – 1999. – Vol. 91. – P.46–59.
104. Supranormalrenographic differential renal function in congenital hydronephrosis: fact, not artifact /G. Capolicchio, R. Jednak, L. Dinh [et al.]// J. Urol. – 1999. – Vol. 161. – P.1290-1294.
105. Increased nephron volume is not a cause of supranormal renographic differential renal function in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction/ W.S. Ham, H.J. Jeong, S.W. Han [et al.]// J.Urol. – 2004. – Vol. 172, № 3. - P.1108-1110.
106. The change in renal function in the supranormal hydronephrotic kidney after pyeloplasty / C. Song, H. Park, S. Park [et al.]// BJU Int. – 2007. –Vol. 99, № 6. – P.1483-1486.
107. The prognostic value of relative renal function greater than 51% in the pelviuretericjunction-obstructed kidney on 99mtechnetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine study/ D. Ben-Meir, J.M. Hutson, S. Donath [et al.]// J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2007. - Vol. 3, №3. – P.184-188.
108. Babu R.F+0 diuretic protocol is superior to F-15 and F+20 for nuclear renogram in children / R. Babu, D. Venkatsubramaniam, E. Venkatachalapathy // Indian Journal of Urology. – 2015. – Vol. 31, № 3. – P. 245-248.
109. Coexisting ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux: diagnostic and therapeutic implications /J.G. Hollowell, H.G. Altman, H.M. Snyder 3rd [et al.]//J. Urol. – 1989. – Vol.142, № 2, Pt. 2. – P.490-493.
110. Does every patient with ureteropelvic junction obstruction need voiding cystourethrography? /Y.S. Kim, S.H. Do, C.H. Hong[et al.]// J.Urol. – 2001. – Vol. 165, № 6,Pt. 2. – P. 2305-2307.
111. Revised guidelines on management of antenatal hydronephrosis /A. Sinha, A. Bagga, A. Krishna[et al.] // Indian Journal of Nephrology. - 2013. – Vol. 23, № 2. – P.83-97.
112. Детская хирургия: национальное руководство / под ред. Ю.Ф.Искакова, А.Ф.Дронова. – М.: ГЕОТАР - Медиа,2009. - 1168 с.
113. Helical computed tomography for identification of crossing vessels in ureteropelvic junction obstruction-comparison with operative findings / H.S.Khaira, J.F. Platt, R.H. Cohan [et al.]// Urology. – 2003. – Vol. 62, № 1. – P. 35-39.
114. Dynamic MR urography in children with uropathic disease with a combined 2D and 3D acquisition protocol—comparison with MAG3 scintigraphy [Электрон. ресурс] / A. Boss, P. Martirosian, J. Fuchs [et al.] // The British Journal of Radiology. – 2014. - Vol. 87, № 1044.– Режим доступа: http://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140426 [21.09.2016].
115. Renal transit time with MR urography in children / R.A. Jones, M.R. PerezBrayfield, A.J. Kirsch [et al.]// Radiology. – 2004. –Vol. 233. –P. 41-50.
116. Grattan-Smith J.D.Magnetic resonance urography in children / J.D. GrattanSmith, R.A. Jones // Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. – 2008. – Vol. 16, № 3. - P. 515-531.
117. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate with magnetic resonance imaging: principles, limitations, and expectations /N. Grenier, I. Mendichovszky, B.D. de Senneville [et al.]//Semin. Nucl. Med. – 2008. – Vol. 38, № 1. – P. 47-55.
118. Detection of evolving acute tubular necrosis with renal 23Na MRI: studies in rats /N. Maril, R. Margalit, S. Rosen[et al.]//Kidney Int. – 2006. – Vol. 69, № 4. – P.765-768.
119. Reduced oxygenation in diabetic rat kidneys measured by T2* weighted magnetic resonance micro-imaging / J. Edlund, P. Hansell, A. Fasching [et al.]//Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. – 2009. –Vol. 645. – P.199-204.
120. Whitaker R.H. Methods of assessing obstruction in dilated ureters / R.H. Whitaker // Br. J. Urol. – 1973. –Vol. 45, № 1. – P. 15-22.
121. Whitaker R.H. The Whitaker test / R.H. Whitaker // Urol. Clin. North. Am. – 1979. –Vol. 6, № 3. – P. 529-539.
122. Johnston R.B.The Whitaker test / R.B. Johnston, C. Porter // Urol. J. – 2014. –Vol. 8,11, № 3. – P.1727-1730.
123. Lupton E.W.The Whitaker test: 35 years on / E.W. Lupton, N.J. George // BJU Int. – 2010. –Vol. 105, № 1. – P. 94-100.
124. Bottinger E.P. TGF-β signaling in renal disease /E.P. Bottinger, M. Bitzer// J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.- 2002. –Vol. 13, № 10.- P. 2600-2610.
125. Role of Urinary Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Concentration in the Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Obstruction in Children /M.T. El-Sherbiny, O.M. Mousa, A.A. Shokeir [et al.]// J. Urol. – 2002. –Vol. 168, № 4. -P. 1798-1800.
126. Urine levels of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction / L.S. Palmer,M. Maizels, W.E. Kaplan [et al.]// Urology. – 1997. –Vol. 50, №5.- P.769-773.
127. Misseri R.Mediators of fibrosis and apoptosis in obstructive uropathies / R. Misseri, K.K. Meldrum // Curr. Urol. Rep. – 2005. –Vol. 6, № 2. – P.140-145.
128. Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children: the role of urinary transforming growth factor-beta and epidermal growth factor / M.A. Taha, A.A. Shokeir, H.G. Osman [et al.]// BJU Int. – 2007. –Vol. 99, № 4. – P.899-903.
129. Chronic unilateral ureteral obstruction is associated with interstitial fibrosis and tubular expression of transforming growth factor-beta /E.J. Wright, A.P.McCaffrey, E.D. Robertson [et al.]// Lab. Invest. – 1996. –Vol. 74, № 2. – P.528-537.
130. Seremetis G.M.TGF-beta mRNA Expression in the Renal Pelvis After Experimental and Clinical Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction/G.M. Seremetis,M.J.Maizels// Urol. – 1996. –Vol. 156, № 1. – P.261-266.
131. Kaneto H. Increased expression of TGF-beta 1 mRNA in the obstructed kidney of rats with unilateral ureteral ligation /H, Kaneto, J. Morrissey, S. Klahr// KidneyInt. – 1993. –Vol. 44, №2. – P.313-321.
132. Chevalier, R.L. Growth factors and apoptosis in neonatal ureteral obstruction / R.L. Chevalier // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. – 1996.–Vol. 7, № 8. – P. 1098-1105.
133. Elevated bladder urine concentration of transforming growth factor-beta 1 correlates with upper urinary tract obstruction in children /P.D. Furness,M. Maizels, S. W. Han[et al.]// J. Urol.- 1999.- Vol. 162,№ 3.- P.1033-1036.
134. The role of bladder urine transforming growth factor-beta1 concentrations in diagnosis and management of unilateral prenatal hydronephrosis /F. Almodhen, O. Loutochin, J.P. Capoli[et al.]// J. Urol. – 2009. – Vol.182, № 1. – P. 292–298.
135. Factors associated with the outcomes of children with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction /Y.Y. Chiou, N.T. Chiu, S.T. Wang [et al.]// J. Urol. – 2004. – Vol. 171, №1.– P.397-402.
136. Urinary transforming growth factor-β1 in children with obstructive uropathy /J. Zieg, K. Blahova, T. Seeman[et al.]/ Nephrology (Carlton). – 2011. – Vol. 16, № 6. –P. 595-598.
137. Urinary biomarkers in prenatally diagnosed unilateral hydronephrosis /M. Madsen, G. R. Norregaard, J. Frokir [et al.]// J. ped. Urol. - 2011. –Vol. 7, № 2. - P.105-112.
Review
For citations:
Sizonov V.V. DIAGNOSTICS SEGMENT PYELOURETERAL OBSTRUCTION IN CHILDREN. Urology Herald. 2016;(4):56-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-4-56-120
Views:
1722
Email this article 
