Preview

Вестник урологии

Расширенный поиск

ДИАГНОСТИКА ОБСТРУКЦИИ ПИЕЛОУРЕТЕРАЛЬНОГО СЕГМЕНТА У ДЕТЕЙ

https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-4-56-120

Аннотация

В лекции детально показаны современные достижения в фундаментальных исследованиях, посвященных проблеме врожденной обструкции верхних мочевых путей, уточнены актуальные диагностические алгоритмы, позволяющие своевременно выявить те виды обструкции пиелоуретерального сегмента, которые несут потенциальную угрозу почечной функции и требуют выполнения пиелопластики.

Об авторе

В. В. Сизонов
Областная детская клиническая больница
Россия
344015, г. Ростов-на-Дону, ул. 339-й Стрелковой Дивизии, 14


Список литературы

1. Детская хирургия: национальное руководство / под ред. Ю.Ф.Исакова. – М.: ГЕОТАР - Медиа,2009. -1168 с.

2. Pediatric Surgery/ edited by A. G. Coran, A. Caldamone, N. S. Adzick[et al]. - 7th Edition-Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012.-848p.

3. Campbell-Walsh Urology / edited by J.A.Wein,L.R. Kavoussi, A.W. Partin A. [et al.]. -11th Edition.- Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016. - 4176 p.

4. Koff S.A. Pathophysiology of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Clinical and experimental observations / S.A. Koff // Uro.l. Clin. North Am.- 1990.- Vol.17.-P. 263-272.

5. Tulp N. Observationes medicae / N. Tulp. - Apud D. Elsevirium, 1672. - 392 p.

6. АшкрафтK.E.Детская хирургия: в 3т. Т 2/ К.Е. Ашкрафт., Т.М. Холдер.– СПб., 1997.- 387 с.

7. Murphy LJT: The History of Urology / C.C. Thomas. - Springfield, III, 1997. – 197 p.

8. Surgical Diseases of the Kidney and Ureter: Vol. 1 of 2. /Morris. –Forgotten Books, 1902. - 406р.

9. Douglas R. Surgical diseases of abdomen. / R. Douglas –Philadelphia: P. Blakiston`s son & co, 1909. – 517р.

10. Заболевания почек и мочевых путей / под ред. Пытель Ю.А.- М., 1969.- 712 с.

11. Albarran J. L'hypertrophie compensatrice en pathologie rénale /J. Albarran // Presse. Med.-1899.- Vol. 7. - P.85—87.

12. Hinman F. Experemental hydronephrosis: Repaer following ureterocystostomy in white rats with complete ureteral obstruction/ F. Hinman //J. Urol.-1919.-Vol.3. - P.147-152.

13. Hinman F. Experimental hydronephrosis: the effect of changes in blood pressure and in blood flow on its rate of development ii. Partial Obstruction of the Renal Artery: Diminished Blood Flow; Diminished Intrarenal Pressure and Oliguria/ F. Нinman, A.B. Hepler// Arch. Surg., 1925. - Vol.11, №.5.- P. 649-659.

14. Donald I. Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound/ I. Donald, J. Macvicar, T.G. Brown // Lancet. – 1958. – Vol. 7,№1. - P.1188-1195.

15. Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction / S.A. Capello, B.A. Kogan, L.J. Giorgi[et al.] //J. Urol.- 2005. –Vol. 174, №4, Pt. 1.- P. 1425-1428.

16. Are modern imaging techniques over diagnosing ureteropelvic junction obstruction /J.S. Wiener, G.K. Emmert, H.G.Mesrobian [et al.]//J. Urol.- 1995.- Vol.154,№2, Pt. 2.-P. 659-661.

17. Postnatal diagnosis and outcome of urinary tract abnormalities detected by antenatal ultrasound /J.C.Tam, E.M.Hodson, K.K.Choong [et al.] // Med. J. Aust. – 1994. – Vol.160. – P.633-637.

18. Does early detection of ureteropelvic junction obstruction improve surgical outcome in terms of renal function?/B. Chertin,A. Fridmans, M. Kniznik [et al.]//J. Urol.- 1999.-P.1037-1040.

19. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis /H.T. Nguyen, C.D. Herndon, C. Cooper [et al.]//Journal of Pediatric Urology.- Vol. 6, № 3.-P.212 – 231.

20. Incidence, diagnosis and treatment of children's congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract detected in ultrasound screening / B.Zhang, H.Wang, N.Sun[et al.]// Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi.–2011. – Vol.49,№ 7.-P.534-538.

21. ParkJ.M. The pathophysiology of UPJ obstruction. Current concepts /J.M. Park, D.A. Bloom //Urol. Clin. North. Am. – 1998.-Vol.25, №2.-P.161-169.

22. Mutations in 12 known dominant disease-causing genes clarify many congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract /D-Y. Hwang, G.C. Dworschak, S. Kohl [et al.] //Kidney international. –2014- Vol.85, №6.- P.1429-1433.

23. Niedzielski J.K. Innervation of narrowed segment of upper ureter in children with ureteropelvic junction obstraction / J.K. Niedzielski // J. Pediatric Surg. -2005.- Vol.40.-P.1219.

24. Ureteralstructureandultrastructure: PartII. Congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction and primary obstructive megaureter / M.K. Hanna, R.D. Jeffs, J.M. Sturgess [et al.]// J. Urol.- 1976. – Vol. 116.-P.725-730.

25. SeremetisG.M.TGF-betam RNA expression in the renal pelvis after experimental and clinical ureteropelvic junction obstruction /G.M. Seremetis, M. Maizels// J. Urol.- 1996. - Vol.156. - P.261-266.

26. Roleofangiotensininthecongenitalanomaliesofthekidneyandurinarytract in the mouse and the human / E. Yerkes, H. Nishimura, Y. Miyazaki [et al.]//KidneyInt.67. - 1998. – P.75-77

27. How They Begin and How They End /J.C. Pope, J.W. Broch, M.C. Adams[et al.] // J.Am.Soc.Nephrol. - 1999. – Vol.10. - P.2018-2028.

28. Chen F.Genetic and Developmental Basis for Urinary Tract Obstruction / F. Chen // Pediatric nephrology. – 2009. – Vol.24, № 4. – P. 1621–1632.

29. Microanatomy and morphometry of the "obstructed" renal pelvis in asymptomatic infants / N.T. Starr, M. Maizels, P. Chou[et al.]// J. Urol. – 1992.–Vol.148, № 2, Pt. 2. – P.519-24.

30. Structural changes of collagen components and diminution of nerves in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction /M. Murakumo, K. Nonomura K, T. Yamashita[et al.]// J. Urol. – 1997. –Vol. 157, № 5. – P.1963-1968.

31. Collagen studies for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction /J.Y. Yoon, J.C. Kim, T.K. Hwang[et al.] //Urology. – 1998.-Vol. 52, №3. - P.494-497.

32. Collagen-to-smooth muscle ratio helps prediction of prognosis after pyeloplasty /W.J. Kim, S.J. Yun, T.S. Lee[et al.]// J. Urol. – 2000. –Vol. 163, № 4. – P.1271-1275.

33. Structural changes of smooth muscle in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction /M. Hosgor, I. Karaca, C. Ulukus[et al.]//J. Pediatr. Surg. – 2005. - Vol. 40, № 10. – P.1632-1636.

34. Structural alterations of the smooth muscle and of the EGFR expression and Ckit in congenital pyeloureteral stenosis. Relationship with its pathogenesis / Cruz V. Vargas, A. García Ceballos, C. Ruiz Hierro[et al.]// Cir. Pediatr. - 2010. – Vol. 23, № 2. – P.82-87.

35. The roles of extracellular matrix proteins, apoptosis and c-kit positive cells in the pathogenesis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction / S.K. Özel, H. Emir, S. Dervişoğlu[et al.]// J. Pediatr. Urol. - 2010. –Vol. 6, №2. – P.125-129.

36. Aberrant differentiation of urothelial cells in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction / T. Hou, X. Yang, B. Hai[et al.]// J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. int. – 2014. –Vol.15, №9. – P.5837-5845.

37. Solari V. Altered expression of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction / V. Solari, A.P. Piotrowska, P. Puri //J. Urol. – 2003. – Vol.70. – P. 2420–2422.

38. Yang X. The expression of Cajal cells at the obstruction site of congenital pelviureteric junction obstruction and quantitative image analysis /X. Yang, Y.Zhang, J.Hu// J. Pediatr. Surg. – 2009. – Vol.44, №12. – P.2339-2342.

39. Changes in interstitial cell of Cajal-like cells density in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction / P. Koleda,W. Apoznanski, Z.Wozniak[et al.] // Urol. Nephrol. Int. – 2012. – Vol.44, №1. – P.7-12.

40. The distribution of interstitial cells of Cajal in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction / W. Apoznanski, P. Koleda, Z. Wozniak[et al.] // Urol. Nephrol. Int. - 2013. – Vol.45, № 3. – P. 607-612.

41. Smooth muscle cell apoptosis and defective neural development in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction / A.M. Kajbafzadeh, S. Payabvash, A.H. Salmasi[et al.]// J. Urol. – 2006. – Vol.176, № 2. – P. 718-723.

42. The roles of extracellular matrix proteins, apoptosis and c-kit positive cells in the pathogenesis of ureteropelvic junction obstruction / S.K. Özel, H. Emir, S. Dervişoğlu [et al.]//J. Pediatr. Urol. - 2010. – Vol.6, № 2. - P.125-129.

43. Extracellular matrix degradation and reduced neural density in children with intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction /C. Kaya, G. Bogaert,D. de Ridder[et al.]// Urology. - 2010. - Vol.76, № 1. – P.185-189.

44. Zeltser I.S.The incidence of crossing vessels in patients with normal ureteropelvic junction examined with endoluminal ultrasound / I.S. Zeltser, J.B. Liu, D.H. Bagley // J. Urol. - 2004.- Vol.172, Issue 6. – P.2304-2307.

45. Sampaio F. J. Renal artery: anatomic study for surgical and radiological practice / F.J. Sampaio, M.A. Possos // Surg. Radiol. Anat.-1992.–Vol. 14. – P. 113-117.

46. Functional assessment of crossing vessels as etiology of ureteropelvic junction obstruction/J.M. Stern, S.Park, J.K. Anderson[et al.]// Urology. – 2007. – Vol.69, № 6. – P.1022-1024.

47. Stewart H.H. A new operation for the treatment of hydronephrosis in association with a lower polar (or aberrant) artery / H.H. Stewart // British Journal of Surgery.-1947.- Vol.35,№ 137. – P.51-57.

48. The absence of crossing vessels in association with ureteropelvic junction obstruction detected by prenatal ultrasonography /J.H. Ross, R. Kay, N.C. Knipper[et al.]//J. Urol. – 1998. – Vol.160. – P.973-975.

49. Ureteropelvicjunctionobstructioninchildren: twovariantsofthesamecongenitalanjmaly? /H.P. BragaLuis, A. Liard, B. Bachy[et al.]// InternationalBraz.J.Urol. -2003. – Vol. 29, № 6. –P.528-534.

50. RooksV.J.Extrinsicureteropelvicjunctionobstructionfromacrossingrenalvessel: demographyandimaging /V.J. Rooks, R.L. Lebowitz // Pediatr. Radiol. - 2001.–Vol. 31, № 2. – P.120-124.

51. Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcomee: a meta-analysis / R.S. Lee, M. Cendron, D.D. Kinnamon [et al.]// Pediatrics. - 2006. – Vol.118, № 2. – P.586-593.

52. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis / H.T. Nguyen, C.D. Herndon, C. Cooper[et al.]// J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2010. –Vol.6, № 3. –P.212-231.

53. Sargent M.A. What is the normal prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux? /M.A. Sargent // Pediatr.Radiol. - 2000. – Vol. 30, № 9. – P.587-593.

54. Fernbach S.K.Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology / S.K. Fernbach, M. Maizels, J.J. Conway// Pediatr. Radiol. – 1993. – Vol.23, № 6. – P.478-480.

55. Onen A. An alternative grading system to refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis and optimal treatment guidelines in neonates with primary UPJ-type hydronephrosis / A. Onen // J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2007. – Vol.3, № 3. – P.200-205.

56. Dhillon H.K. Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the Great Ormond Streetexperience. / H.K. Dhillon //Br. J. Urol. – 1998.–Vol. 81,(Suppl. 20). - P.39-44.

57. Antenatallydetected pelviureteric junction obstruction. Is non-operation safe? / N.P. Madden, D.F. Thomas, A.C. Gordon[et al.]// Br. J. Urol. – 1991. – Vol. 68, № 3. - P.305-310.

58. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system) / H.T. Nguyen, C.B. Benson, B. Bromley [et al.] // J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2014. – Dec. – Vol. 10, № 6. – P.982-998.

59. Diagnostic accuracy of renal pelvic dilatation for detecting surgically managed ureteropelvic junction obstruction / C.S. Dias, J.M. Silva, A.K. Pereira[et al.]// J. Urol. – 2013. – Vol.190, № 2. –P.661-666.

60. CrooksK.K.Gianthydronephrosisinchildren / K.K.Crooks, W.H. Hendren, R.C. Pfister//J.Pediatr.Surg. – 1979. – Vol. 14, № 6. – P.844-850.

61. HuG.Giant hydronephrosis secondary to ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults: report of a case and review of literatures / G. Hu, M. Luo, Y. Xu // International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. – 2015. – Vol. 8, № 3. – P. 4715-4717.

62. Prenatal diagnosis of unilateral hydronephrosis with early postnatal obstruction / J. Mandell, H.W. Kinard, C.A. Mittlestoedi[et al.]// J. Urol. – 1984. – Vol. 132, № 2. - P.3003-3307.

63. Valayer J.Hydronephrosis due to pelviureteric janction in infancy / J.Valayer, G. Adda // J. Pediatric Surg. – 1976. – Vol. 11. – P.57-60.

64. Кучера Я. Хирургия гидронефроза и уретерогидронефроза / Я.Кучера. - Прага.: Государственное издательство медицинской литературы, 1963.-221 с.

65. Giant hydronephrosis due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A rare case report, and a review of the literature /Q-F.Wang, G. Zeng, L. Zhong [et al.]//Molecular and Clinical Oncology. - 2016. – Vol. 5, № 1. - P.19-22.

66. Metcalfe P.D.Symptomatic versus asymptomatic pyeloplasties: A single institution review / P.D. Metcalfe, M. Assmus, D. Kiddoo// Canadian Urological Association Journal. - 2014 – Vol. 8. – P. 428-431.

67. Shokeir A.A. Renal colic: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment / A.A. Shokeir //Eur. Urol. – 2001. – Vol.39. - P.241-249.

68. Сизонов В.В.Роль конфликтного сосуда в обструкции пиелоуретерального сегмента у детей /В.В. Сизонов, М.И. Коган //Детская хирургия. – 2011. - №6. – С. 25-29.

69. Belman A.B. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction as a cause for intermittent abdominal pain in children / A.B. Belman // Pediatrics. – 1991. – Vol. 88. –P. 1066-1069.

70. Detection of crossing vessels in pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Clinical patterns and imaging findings / A.D. Weiss, S. Kadakia, R. Kurzweil[et al.]// Journal of Pediatric Urology. – 2015. - Vol.11, № 4. – P.173-173.

71. Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary in infants with obstructive hydronephrosis? /S.H. Song, S.B. Lee, Y.S. Park[et al.]//J.Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 177, № 3. – P.1098-1101.

72. Nonrefluxing neonatal hydronephrosis and the risk of urinary tract infection / J.H. Lee, H.S. Choi, J.K. Kim [et al.]// J. Urol. - 2008. – Vol. 179, № 4. – P.1524-1528.

73. Zareba P.Risk factors for febrile urinary tract infection in infants with prenatal hydronephrosis: comprehensive single center analysis / P. Zareba, A.J. Lorenzo, L.H. Braga //J. Urol. - 2014. –Vol. 191, № 5. – P.1614-1618.

74. Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections in antenatal hydronephrosis /L.H. Braga, H. Mijovic, F. Farrokhyar[et al.]// Pediatrics. – 2013. – Vol.131, № 1. – P.251-261.

75. Clinical significance of primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary antibiotic prophylaxis after acute pyelonephritis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study /E.H. Garin, F. Olavarria, V. Garcia Nieto[et al.] //Pediatrics. -2006. –Vol. 117. – P. 626-632.

76. . Prophylaxis after first febrile urinary tract infection in children? A multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial /G. Montini, L. Rigon, P. Zucchetta[et al.]// Pediatrics. – 2008. –Vol. 122. - P. 1064-1071.

77. Antibiotic prophylaxis and recurrent urinary tract infection in children /J.C. Craig, J.M. Simpson, G.J. Williams[et al.]// N. Engl. J. Med. - 2009. – Vol. 361. - P.1748-1759.

78. Revised guidelines on management of antenatal hydronephrosis /A. Sinha, A. Bagga, A. Krishna [et al.] // Indian Journal of Nephrology. - 2013. – Vol. 23, № 2. – P.83-97.

79. Urinary tract infections in children: EAU/ESPU / R. Stein, H.S. Dogan, P. Hoebeke [et al.] // Eur. Urol. - 2015. – Vol. 67, № 3. – P. 546-558.

80. Ureteropelvic obstruction in children: Experiences with 109 cases / P.P. Kelalis, O.S. Culp, G.B. Stickler [et al.] // J. Urol. – 1971. – Vol. 106. – P.418-422.

81. Williams D.I.The prognosis of pelviureteric obstruction in childhood: A review of 190 cases / D.I. Williams, M.M. Kenawi // Eur. Urol. – 1976. –Vol. 2. – P.57-63.

82. AhmadAlShare. Гидрокаликонефроз у детей: особенности диагностики и лечения: дис. … док. мед:AhmadAlShare. – Кишинев, 2007.-111 с.

83. Barratt T.M. Pediatric Nephrology /T.M. Barratt, E.D. Avner, W.E. Harmon, - 4th ed. - Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1999. – P. 1010.

84. Hypertension is an indication for surgery in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction /D. Waard, P. Dik, M.R. Lilien [et al.] // J.Urol. - 2008. – Vol. 179, № 5. – P.1976-1978.

85. Дворяковский И.В.Эхография внутренних органов у детей / И.В.Дворяковский. – М.: Рос. ассоц. врачей ультразвуковой диагностики в перинатологии и гинекологии, 1994. – 455 с.

86. Postnatal management of infants with antenatally detected hydronephrosis / N. Aksu, O. Yavaşcan, M. Kangin[et al.] // Pediatr. Nephrol. - 2005. – Vol. 20, № 9. – P.1253-1259.

87. Wiener J.S.Optimal timing of initial postnatal ultrasonography in newborns with prenatal hydronephrosis /J.S. Wiener, S.M. O'Hara // J. Urol. – 2002. – Vol.168,№4, Pt. 2. - 1826-1829.

88. Postnatal investigation and outcome of isolated fetal renal pelvis dilatation /P. Masson, G. De Luca, N. Tapia [et al.] //Arch. Pediatr. - 2009. – Vol.16, № 8. – P.1103-1110.

89. Dias C.S.Diagnostic accuracy of renal pelvic dilatation for detecting surgically managed ureteropelvic junction obstruction /C.S. Dias, J.M. Silva, A.K. Pereira [et al] // J. Urol. - 2013. – Vol. 190, (Suppl. 2). – P.661-666.

90. Dhillon H.K. Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the Great Ormond Street experience / H.K. Dhillon// Br. J. Urol. – 1998. – Vol.81, № 2. - P.39-44.

91. Postnatal management of antenatally diagnosed ureteropelvic junction obstruction / A.Ismail, A. Elkholy, O. Zaghmout [et al.] // J. Ped. Urol. - 2006. –Vol. 2. –P.163-168.

92. Imaji R.Calyx to parenchyma ratio in pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction / R. Imaji, P.A. Dewan // BJU Int. - 2002. – Vol. 89,№ 1. - P.73-77.

93. Evaluation of sonographic renal parenchymal area in the management of hydronephrosis /L.V.Rodríguez, J. Lock, W.A. Kennedy [et al.] // J.Urol. – 2001. – Vol. 165,№ 2. – P.548-551.

94. Ramesh B. Pelvis/cortex ratio: A sonographic marker of pelvi ureteric junction obstruction in children /B. Ramesh, V.V Sai// Indian J. Urol. – 2010. – Vol. 26, № 4. – P. 494–496.

95. Ларионов И.И.Диуретическое УЗИ почек у детей – новый метод диагностики обструкции лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента / И. И. Ларионов, А.И. Демин, В.М. Кузнецов // VIII Всероссийский съезд урологов. –Свердловск, 1988. - С.136.

96. Diagnostic accuracy of color Doppler sonographic study of the ureteric jets in evaluation of hydronephrosis / J.Jr. Bessa, F.T. Dénes, M.C. Chammas[et al.] // J. Pediatr. Urol. - 2008. –Vol. 4, № 2. - P. 113-117.

97. PalmerJ.M.Diuretic Enhanced Duplex Doppler Sonography in 33 Children Presenting with Hydronephrosis: A Study of Test Sensitivity, Specificity and Precision/J.M.Palmer, M. DiSandro// J.Urol. - 1995. –Vol. 154, № 5. –P.1885-1888.

98. Renal diuretic duplex Doppler sonography in childhood hydronephrosis /D. Akata, M. Haliloglu, M. Caglar [et al.] // Acta. Radiol.- 1999. – Vol. 40, № 2. – P. 203-206.

99. Liepe K. Canrenal doppler sonography replace diuretic radionuclide renography in infants with hydronephrosis?/ K. Liepe, H. Taut-Sack//Turk.J.Pediatr. – 2006. –Vol. 48, № 3. – P.221-227.

100. Consensus on diuresis renographyfor investigating the dilated upper urinary tract / P. O,Reilly, M. Aurell, K. Britton [et al.] //J.Nucl.Med. – 1996. –Vol. 37, №11 - P.1872-1876.

101. Gordon I.Auspices of Paediatric Committee of European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Guidelines for standard and diuretic renogram in children /I. Gordon, A. Piepsz, R. Sixt // Eur.J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. – 2011. – Vol. 38, № 6. – P.1175-1188.

102. Shulkin B.L.Procedure guideline for diuretic renography in children 3.0. /B.L Shulkin, G.A. Mandell, J.A. Cooper [et al.] // J. Nucl. Med. Technol. - 2008. – Vol. 36, № 3. - P.162-168.

103. Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of renal function obtained from renogram: International Consensus Committee from the Scientific Committee of Radionuclides in Nephrourology / A.Prigent, P. Cosgriff, G.F. Gates [et al.] // Semin. Nucl. Med. – 1999. – Vol. 91. – P.46–59.

104. Supranormalrenographic differential renal function in congenital hydronephrosis: fact, not artifact /G. Capolicchio, R. Jednak, L. Dinh [et al.]// J. Urol. – 1999. – Vol. 161. – P.1290-1294.

105. Increased nephron volume is not a cause of supranormal renographic differential renal function in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction/ W.S. Ham, H.J. Jeong, S.W. Han [et al.]// J.Urol. – 2004. – Vol. 172, № 3. - P.1108-1110.

106. The change in renal function in the supranormal hydronephrotic kidney after pyeloplasty / C. Song, H. Park, S. Park [et al.]// BJU Int. – 2007. –Vol. 99, № 6. – P.1483-1486.

107. The prognostic value of relative renal function greater than 51% in the pelviuretericjunction-obstructed kidney on 99mtechnetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine study/ D. Ben-Meir, J.M. Hutson, S. Donath [et al.]// J. Pediatr. Urol. – 2007. - Vol. 3, №3. – P.184-188.

108. Babu R.F+0 diuretic protocol is superior to F-15 and F+20 for nuclear renogram in children / R. Babu, D. Venkatsubramaniam, E. Venkatachalapathy // Indian Journal of Urology. – 2015. – Vol. 31, № 3. – P. 245-248.

109. Coexisting ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux: diagnostic and therapeutic implications /J.G. Hollowell, H.G. Altman, H.M. Snyder 3rd [et al.]//J. Urol. – 1989. – Vol.142, № 2, Pt. 2. – P.490-493.

110. Does every patient with ureteropelvic junction obstruction need voiding cystourethrography? /Y.S. Kim, S.H. Do, C.H. Hong[et al.]// J.Urol. – 2001. – Vol. 165, № 6,Pt. 2. – P. 2305-2307.

111. Revised guidelines on management of antenatal hydronephrosis /A. Sinha, A. Bagga, A. Krishna[et al.] // Indian Journal of Nephrology. - 2013. – Vol. 23, № 2. – P.83-97.

112. Детская хирургия: национальное руководство / под ред. Ю.Ф.Искакова, А.Ф.Дронова. – М.: ГЕОТАР - Медиа,2009. - 1168 с.

113. Helical computed tomography for identification of crossing vessels in ureteropelvic junction obstruction-comparison with operative findings / H.S.Khaira, J.F. Platt, R.H. Cohan [et al.]// Urology. – 2003. – Vol. 62, № 1. – P. 35-39.

114. Dynamic MR urography in children with uropathic disease with a combined 2D and 3D acquisition protocol—comparison with MAG3 scintigraphy [Электрон. ресурс] / A. Boss, P. Martirosian, J. Fuchs [et al.] // The British Journal of Radiology. – 2014. - Vol. 87, № 1044.– Режим доступа: http://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140426 [21.09.2016].

115. Renal transit time with MR urography in children / R.A. Jones, M.R. PerezBrayfield, A.J. Kirsch [et al.]// Radiology. – 2004. –Vol. 233. –P. 41-50.

116. Grattan-Smith J.D.Magnetic resonance urography in children / J.D. GrattanSmith, R.A. Jones // Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. – 2008. – Vol. 16, № 3. - P. 515-531.

117. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate with magnetic resonance imaging: principles, limitations, and expectations /N. Grenier, I. Mendichovszky, B.D. de Senneville [et al.]//Semin. Nucl. Med. – 2008. – Vol. 38, № 1. – P. 47-55.

118. Detection of evolving acute tubular necrosis with renal 23Na MRI: studies in rats /N. Maril, R. Margalit, S. Rosen[et al.]//Kidney Int. – 2006. – Vol. 69, № 4. – P.765-768.

119. Reduced oxygenation in diabetic rat kidneys measured by T2* weighted magnetic resonance micro-imaging / J. Edlund, P. Hansell, A. Fasching [et al.]//Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. – 2009. –Vol. 645. – P.199-204.

120. Whitaker R.H. Methods of assessing obstruction in dilated ureters / R.H. Whitaker // Br. J. Urol. – 1973. –Vol. 45, № 1. – P. 15-22.

121. Whitaker R.H. The Whitaker test / R.H. Whitaker // Urol. Clin. North. Am. – 1979. –Vol. 6, № 3. – P. 529-539.

122. Johnston R.B.The Whitaker test / R.B. Johnston, C. Porter // Urol. J. – 2014. –Vol. 8,11, № 3. – P.1727-1730.

123. Lupton E.W.The Whitaker test: 35 years on / E.W. Lupton, N.J. George // BJU Int. – 2010. –Vol. 105, № 1. – P. 94-100.

124. Bottinger E.P. TGF-β signaling in renal disease /E.P. Bottinger, M. Bitzer// J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.- 2002. –Vol. 13, № 10.- P. 2600-2610.

125. Role of Urinary Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Concentration in the Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Obstruction in Children /M.T. El-Sherbiny, O.M. Mousa, A.A. Shokeir [et al.]// J. Urol. – 2002. –Vol. 168, № 4. -P. 1798-1800.

126. Urine levels of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction / L.S. Palmer,M. Maizels, W.E. Kaplan [et al.]// Urology. – 1997. –Vol. 50, №5.- P.769-773.

127. Misseri R.Mediators of fibrosis and apoptosis in obstructive uropathies / R. Misseri, K.K. Meldrum // Curr. Urol. Rep. – 2005. –Vol. 6, № 2. – P.140-145.

128. Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children: the role of urinary transforming growth factor-beta and epidermal growth factor / M.A. Taha, A.A. Shokeir, H.G. Osman [et al.]// BJU Int. – 2007. –Vol. 99, № 4. – P.899-903.

129. Chronic unilateral ureteral obstruction is associated with interstitial fibrosis and tubular expression of transforming growth factor-beta /E.J. Wright, A.P.McCaffrey, E.D. Robertson [et al.]// Lab. Invest. – 1996. –Vol. 74, № 2. – P.528-537.

130. Seremetis G.M.TGF-beta mRNA Expression in the Renal Pelvis After Experimental and Clinical Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction/G.M. Seremetis,M.J.Maizels// Urol. – 1996. –Vol. 156, № 1. – P.261-266.

131. Kaneto H. Increased expression of TGF-beta 1 mRNA in the obstructed kidney of rats with unilateral ureteral ligation /H, Kaneto, J. Morrissey, S. Klahr// KidneyInt. – 1993. –Vol. 44, №2. – P.313-321.

132. Chevalier, R.L. Growth factors and apoptosis in neonatal ureteral obstruction / R.L. Chevalier // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. – 1996.–Vol. 7, № 8. – P. 1098-1105.

133. Elevated bladder urine concentration of transforming growth factor-beta 1 correlates with upper urinary tract obstruction in children /P.D. Furness,M. Maizels, S. W. Han[et al.]// J. Urol.- 1999.- Vol. 162,№ 3.- P.1033-1036.

134. The role of bladder urine transforming growth factor-beta1 concentrations in diagnosis and management of unilateral prenatal hydronephrosis /F. Almodhen, O. Loutochin, J.P. Capoli[et al.]// J. Urol. – 2009. – Vol.182, № 1. – P. 292–298.

135. Factors associated with the outcomes of children with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction /Y.Y. Chiou, N.T. Chiu, S.T. Wang [et al.]// J. Urol. – 2004. – Vol. 171, №1.– P.397-402.

136. Urinary transforming growth factor-β1 in children with obstructive uropathy /J. Zieg, K. Blahova, T. Seeman[et al.]/ Nephrology (Carlton). – 2011. – Vol. 16, № 6. –P. 595-598.

137. Urinary biomarkers in prenatally diagnosed unilateral hydronephrosis /M. Madsen, G. R. Norregaard, J. Frokir [et al.]// J. ped. Urol. - 2011. –Vol. 7, № 2. - P.105-112.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Сизонов В.В. ДИАГНОСТИКА ОБСТРУКЦИИ ПИЕЛОУРЕТЕРАЛЬНОГО СЕГМЕНТА У ДЕТЕЙ. Вестник урологии. 2016;(4):56-120. https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-4-56-120

For citation:


Sizonov V.V. DIAGNOSTICS SEGMENT PYELOURETERAL OBSTRUCTION IN CHILDREN. Urology Herald. 2016;(4):56-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-4-56-120

Просмотров: 1723


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-6424 (Online)