Использование мочеточникового кожуха во время ретроградной интраренальной хирургии
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-3-137-146
Аннотация
Одним из современных методов лечения конкрементов почек до двух сантиметров является ретроградная интраренальная хирургия (РИРХ). Технический прогресс и развитие новых технологий привели к расширению показаний для проведения РИРХ. Использование мочеточниковых кожухов при этом не является обязательным, однако существует ряд причин, по которым урологи, как правило, используют кожухи, а именно: многократный и безопасный доступ в почку, снижение внутрипочечного давления, снижение риска повреждения инструмента, снижение риска травматизации стенок мочеточника во время литоэкстракции. В обзоре литературы представлены результаты исследований, показывающих безопасность и эффективность использования мочеточниковых кожухов при РИРХ у пациентов с конкрементами почек до 2 сантиметров. Оценивались такие показатели, как характеристики мочеточниковых кожухов, время оперативного вмешательства, показатель Stone Free Rate, интра- и послеоперационные осложнения, а также влияние кожуха на стенку мочеточника. Написание обзора проводили в соответствии с протоколом PRISMA protocol (http://www.prisma-statement.org) для данного типа исследования (ID-423604). При написании данного обзора мы проанализировали статьи, опубликованные в международных базах данных (Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus).
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
С. В. ПоповРоссия
Сергей Валерьевич Попов — д-р мед. наук.
Санкт-Петербург
Конфликт интересов:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов
И. Н. Орлов
Россия
Игорь Николаевич Орлов — канд. мед. наук.
Санкт-Петербург
Конфликт интересов:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов
Д. А. Сытник
Россия
Дмитрий Анатольевич Сытник
Санкт-Петербург
Конфликт интересов:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов
Ю. А. Михеев
Россия
Юрий Александрович Михеев
Санкт-Петербург
Конфликт интересов:
Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов
Список литературы
1. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris 2024
2. Клинические рекомендации «Мочекаменная болезнь» МЗ РФ, 2024
3. Takayasu H, Aso Y. Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J Urol. 1974;112(2):176-178. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59675-5
4. Al-Qahtani SM, Letendre J, Thomas A, Natalin R, Saussez T, Traxer O. Which ureteral access sheath is compatible with your flexible ureteroscope? J Endourol. 2014;28(3):286-290. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0375
5. Monga M, Gawlik A, Durfee W. Systematic evaluation of ureteral access sheaths. Urology. 2004;63(5):834-836. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.12.025
6. Gur U, Holland R, Lask DM, Livne PM, Lifshitz DA. Expanding use of ureteral access sheath for stones larger than access sheath’s internal diameter. Urology. 2007;69(1):170-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.049
7. Chen Y, Li C, Gao L, Lin L, Zheng L, Ke L, Chen J, Kuang R. Novel Flexible Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath Can Actively Control Intrarenal Pressure and Obtain a Complete Stone-Free Status. J Endourol. 2022;36(9):1143-1148. DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0004
8. Chen Y, Zheng L, Lin L, Li C, Gao L, Ke L, Kuang R, Chen J. A novel flexible vacuum-assisted ureteric access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int. 2022;130(5):586-588. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15873
9. Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM. Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol. 2001;165(3):789-793. PMID: 11176469.
10. Traxer O, Wendt-Nordahl G, Sodha H, Rassweiler J, Meretyk S, Tefekli A, Coz F, de la Rosette JJ. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol. 2015;33(12):2137-2144. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1582-8
11. Damar E, Senocak C, Ozbek R, Haberal HB, Sadioglu FE, Yordam M, Bozkurt OF. Does ureteral access sheath affect the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(5):777-781. DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2021.1941117
12. Yitgin Y, Yitgin E, Verep S, Gasimov K, Tefik T, Karakose A. Is Access Sheath Essential for Safety and Effective Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021;31(10):1202-1206. DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.10.1202
13. Pardalidis NP, Papatsoris AG, Kapotis CG, Kosmaoglou EV. Treatment of impacted lower third ureteral stones with the use of the ureteral access sheath. Urol Res. 2006;34(3):211-214. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-006-0044-6
14. Berquet G, Prunel P, Verhoest G, Mathieu R, Bensalah K. The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones. World J Urol. 2014;32(1):229-232. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1181-5
15. Thomsen HS. Pyelorenal backflow. Clinical and experimental investigations. Radiologic, nuclear, medical and pathoanatomic studies. Dan Med Bull. 1984;31(6):438-457. PMID: 6394220.
16. Rehman J, Monga M, Landman J, Lee DI, Felfela T, Conradie MC, Srinivas R, Sundaram CP, Clayman RV. Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology. 2003;61(4):713-718. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02440-8
17. Jung H, Osther PJ. Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy. Springerplus. 2015;4:373. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4
18. Schwalb DM, Eshghi M, Davidian M, Franco I. Morphological and physiological changes in the urinary tract associated with ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy: an experimental study. J Urol. 1993;149(6):1576-185. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36456-x
19. Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, Raj GV, Santa-Cruz RW, Preminger GM. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):33-36. DOI: 10.1089/089277904322836631
20. Fang L, Xie G, Zheng Z, Liu W, Zhu J, Huang T, Lu Y, Cheng Y. The Effect of Ratio of Endoscope-Sheath Diameter on Intrapelvic Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopic Lasertripsy. J Endourol. 2019;33(2):132-139. DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0774
21. MacCraith E, Yap LC, Elamin M, Patterson K, Brady CM, Hennessey DB. Evaluation of the Impact of Ureteroscope, Access Sheath, and Irrigation System Selection on Intrarenal Pressures in a Porcine Kidney Model. J Endourol. 2021;35(4):512-517. DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0838
22. Sener TE, Tanidir Y, Bin Hamri S, Sever IH, Ozdemir B, Al-Humam A, Traxer O. Effects of flexible ureteroscopy on renal blood flow: a prospective evaluation. Scand J Urol. 2018;52(3):213-218. DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1437770
23. L’esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr, Marguet CG, Springhart WP, Maloney ME, Albala DM, Preminger GM. Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology. 2005;66(2):252-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.019
24. Lallas CD, Auge BK, Raj GV, Santa-Cruz R, Madden JF, Preminger GM. Laser Doppler flowmetric determination of ureteral blood flow after ureteral access sheath placement. J Endourol. 2002;16(8):583-590. DOI: 10.1089/089277902320913288
25. Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580-584. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197
26. Schoenthaler M, Buchholz N, Farin E, Ather H, Bach C, Bach T, Denstedt JD, Fritsche HM, Grasso M, Hakenberg OW, Herwig R, Knoll T, Kuehhas FE, Liatsikos E, Liske P, Marberger M, Osther PJ, Santos JM, Sarica K, Seitz C, Straub M, Traxer O, Trinchieri A, Turney B, Miernik A. The Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS): a multicenter video-based evaluation of inter-rater reliability. World J Urol. 2014;32(4):1033-1040. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1185-1
27. Guzelburc V, Guven S, Boz MY, Erkurt B, Soytas M, Altay B, Albayrak S. Intraoperative Evaluation of Ureteral Access Sheath-Related Injuries Using Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(1):23-26. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0294
28. Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Ardelt PU, Adams F, Kuehhas FE, Schoenthaler M. Standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique to improve stone-free rates. Urology. 2012;80(6):1198-1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.042.
29. Barbour ML, Raman JD. Incidence and Predictors for Ipsilateral Hydronephrosis Following Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy. Urology. 2015;86(3):465-471. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.016
30. Baş O, Tuygun C, Dede O, Sarı S, Çakıcı MÇ, Öztürk U, Göktuğ G, İmamoğlu A. Factors affecting complication rates of retrograde flexible ureterorenoscopy: analysis of 1571 procedures-a single-center experience. World J Urol. 2017;35(5):819-826. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1930-3
31. Law YXT, Teoh JYC, Castellani D, Lim EJ, Chan EOT, Wroclawski M, Pirola GM, Giulioni C, Rubilotta E, Gubbioti M, Scarcella S, Chew BH, Traxer O, Somani BK, Gauhar V. Role of pre-operative ureteral stent on outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS): systematic review and meta-analysis of 3831 patients and comparison of Asian and non-Asian cohorts. World J Urol. 2022;40(6):1377-1389. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03935-2
32. Mahajan PM, Padhye AS, Bhave AA, Sovani YB, Kshirsagar YB, Bapat SS. Is stenting required before retrograde intrarenal surgery with access sheath. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(3):326-328. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.56185
33. Chang X, Wang Y, Li J, Han Z. Prestenting Versus Nonprestenting on the Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Large Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2021;105(7-8):560-567. DOI: 10.1159/000506652
34. Geavlete P, Mulţescu R, Geavlete B. Re: Application of Suctioning Ureteral Access Sheath During Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones Decreases the Risk of Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. Eur Urol. 2024;85(1):94. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.020
35. Elbir F, Başıbüyük İ, Topaktaş R, Kardaş S, Tosun M, Tepeler A, Armağan A. Flexible ureterorenoscopy results: Analysis of 279 cases. Turk J Urol. 2015;41(3):113-118. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2015.81488
36. Yuruk E, Binbay M, Ozgor F, Erbin A, Berberoglu Y, Muslumanoglu AY. Flexible ureterorenoscopy is safe and efficient for the treatment of kidney stones in patients with chronic kidney disease. Urology. 2014;84(6):1279-1284. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.038
37. Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Katzenwadel A, Ardelt P, Wetterauer U, Traxer O, Miernik A. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in treatment of nephrolithiasis: is a 100% stone-free rate achievable? J Endourol. 2012;26(5):489-493. DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0405
38. Mogilevkin Y, Sofer M, Margel D, Greenstein A, Lifshitz D. Predicting an effective ureteral access sheath insertion: a bicenter prospective study. J Endourol. 2014;28(12):1414-1417. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0215
39. Viers BR, Viers LD, Hull NC, Hanson TJ, Mehta RA, Bergstralh EJ, Vrtiska TJ, Krambeck AE. The Difficult Ureter: Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics Associated With Upper Urinary Tract Access at the Time of Ureteroscopic Stone Treatment. Urology. 2015;86(5):878-884. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.007
40. Kuntz NJ, Neisius A, Tsivian M, Ghaffar M, Patel N, Ferrandino MN, Sur RL, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME. Balloon Dilation of the Ureter: A Contemporary Review of Outcomes and Complications. J Urol. 2015;194(2):413-417. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2917
41. Jacquemet B, Martin L, Pastori J, Bailly V, Guichard G, Bernardini S, Chabannes E, Bittard H, Kleinclauss F. Comparison of the efficacy and morbidity of flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones compared with other renal locations. J Endourol. 2014;28(10):1183-1187. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0286
42. Ulvik Ø, Rennesund K, Gjengstø P, Wentzel-Larsen T, Ulvik NM. Ureteroscopy with and without safety guide wire: should the safety wire still be mandatory? J Endourol. 2013;27(10):1197-1202. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0248
43. Koo KC, Yoon JH, Park NC, Lee HS, Ahn HK, Lee KS, Kim DK, Cho KS, Chung BH, Hong CH. The Impact of Preoperative α-Adrenergic Antagonists on Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion Force and the Upper Limit of Force Required to Avoid Ureteral Mucosal Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Urol. 2018;199(6):1622-1630. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.173
44. Erturhan S, Bayrak Ö, Şen H, Yılmaz AE, Seçkiner İ. Can alpha blockers facilitate the placement of ureteral access sheaths in retrograde intrarenal surgery? Turk J Urol. 2019;45(2):108-112. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.63373
45. Köprü B, Ebiloğlu T, Kaya E, Zor M, Bedir S, Topuz B, Sarikaya S, Ergin G, Yalçin S. Does preoperative use of silodosin affect the stages of F-URS procedure? Arch Esp Urol. 2020;73(1):47-53. (In English, Spanish). PMID: 31950923
46. Kim JK, Choi CI, Lee SH, Han JH, Shim YS, Choo MS; Young Endourological Study group. Silodosin for Prevention of Ureteral Injuries Resulting from Insertion of a Ureteral Access Sheath: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(2):572-579. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.009
47. Bozzini G, Bevilacqua L, Besana U, Calori A, Pastore A, Romero Otero J, Macchi A, Broggini P, Breda A, Gozen A, Inzillo R, Puliatti S, Sighinolfi MC, Rocco B, Liatsikos E, Muller A, Buizza C. Ureteral access sheath-related injuries vs. post-operative infections. Is sheath insertion always needed? A prospective randomized study to understand the lights and shadows of this practice. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021:S0210-4806(21)00125-X. (In English, Spanish). DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.11.010. Epub ahead of print.
48. Hawken SR, Hiller SC, Daignault-Newton S, Ghani KR, Hollingsworth JM, Conrado B, Maitland C, Wenzler DL, Ludlow JK, Ambani SN, Brummett CM, Dauw CA; Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative. Opioid-Free Discharge is Not Associated With Increased Unplanned Healthcare Encounters After Ureteroscopy: Results From a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative. Urology. 2021;158:57-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.037
49. Oğuz U, Şahin T, Şenocak Ç, Özyuvalı E, Bozkurt ÖF, Reşorlu B, Ünsal A. Factors associated with postoperative pain after retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones. Turk J Urol. 2017;43(3):303-308. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.58997
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Попов С.В., Орлов И.Н., Сытник Д.А., Михеев Ю.А. Использование мочеточникового кожуха во время ретроградной интраренальной хирургии. Вестник урологии. 2025;13(3):137-146. https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-3-137-146
For citation:
Popov S.V., Orlov I.N., Sytnik D.A., Mikheev Yu.A. Use of a ureteral sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urology Herald. 2025;13(3):137-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-3-137-146