Comparative outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with primary and recurrent nephrolithiasis

Introduction. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is one of the recommended treatments for kidney stones exceeding 20 mm in size. A significant proportion of patients with recurrent nephrolithiasis require repeated surgical intervention on the ipsilateral side throughout their lifetime.
Objective. To compare the outcomes of primary and repeat mini-PNL procedures performed for recurrent urolithiasis on the ipsilateral side in patients with kidney stones.
Materials & methods. The study included two distinct patient groups. Group 1 comprised 124 patients with a primary episode of nephrolithiasis, while Group 2 consisted of 59 patients with a recurrent form of nephrolithiasis who had previously undergone PNL on the side of recurrence. All participants underwent mini-PNL. Preoperative patient characteristics and surgical treatment outcomes were evaluated. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification modifed for PNL. The achievement of stone free rate (SFR) was assessed using multispiral computed tomography (MSCT).
Results. The groups exhibited comparable preoperative characteristics. The SFR was 70.2% in Group 1 and 69.5% in Group 2 (p = 0.926). The median surgical duration was shorter in Group 2 at 90 (70.0 – 129.5) minutes compared to 100 (83.6 – 135.0) minutes in Group 1 (p = 0.082). The median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days for both groups (p = 0.246). The overall complication rate was 25.8% (32 patients) in Group 1 and 27.1% (16 patients) in Group 2 (p = 0.909). The median haemoglobin decreases on postoperative day 3 was 8.5 g/L in Group 1 and 8.0 g/L in Group 2 (p = 0.405).
Conclusion. Mini-PNL via a single access represents an effective treatment modality for both primary and recurrent forms of nephrolithiasis. The incidence of postoperative complications demonstrates a comparable safety profile for both primary and recurrent PNL procedures.

1. Kaprin A.D., Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V., Anokhin N.V., Gadzhiev N.K., Malkhasyan V.A., Akopyan G.N., Prosyannikov M.Yu. The incidence of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2020. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2022;15(2)10-17. (In Russian). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-10-17

2. Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301-1320. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6

3. Trinchieri A, Ostini F, Nespoli R, Rovera F, Montanari E, Zanetti G. A prospective study of recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence after a first renal stone. J Urol. 1999;162(1):27-30. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00007

4. Uribarri J, Oh MS, Carroll HJ. The first kidney stone. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111(12):1006-1009. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-12-1006

5. Panferov A.S., Kotov S.V. A comparative analysis of simultaneous bilateral versus staged supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with bilateral kidney stones. Urologiia. 2019;(2):31-35. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2019.2.31-35

6. Ganpule A, Desai M. Fate of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a critical analysis. J Endourol. 2009;23(3):399-403. DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.0217

7. Ghani KR, Sammon JD, Bhojani N, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M, Sukumar S, Littleton R, Peabody JO, Menon M, Trinh QD. Trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy use and outcomes in the United States. J Urol. 2013;190(2):558-564. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.036

8. Kotov S.V., Belomyttsev S.V., Mamaev I.E., Perov R.A., Pulbere S.A., Surenkov D.N. Evolution of approaches in the treatment of urolithiasis. Multicenter analysis of the work of 5 urological departments of multidisciplinary hospitals in Moscow. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2020;13(5):51-58. (In Russian). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2020-13-5-51-58

9. Mamaev I.E., Akhmedov K.K., Dolomanov K.A., Saipulaev G.Sh., Manuilova O.O., Stepanenko K.V., Savkina K.V., Kotov S.V. Minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy without ureteric catheterization. Comparison with the standard procedure. Experimental and Сlinical Urology. 2021;14(2):58- 63. (In Russian). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-2-58-63

10. Yesil S, Ozturk U, Goktug HN, Tuygun C, Nalbant I, Imamoglu MA. Previous open renal surgery increased vascular complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) compared with primary and secondary PCNL and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients: a retrospective study. Urol Int. 2013;91(3):331-334. DOI: 10.1159/000351968

11. de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, Wolf JS Jr, Grabe M, Gravas S; CROES PCNL Study Group. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(2):246-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.055

12. Sakly A, Khaldi S, Touati A, Dimassi E, Zakhama W, Binous Y. Outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for kidney stones: a prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024;86(10):5711-5715. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002502

13. Farshid S, Tayyeb Ghasemi M, Alizadeh M. Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Success Rate and Complications in Patients with a History of Different Therapeutic Interventions for Kidney Stone. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2023;15(2):e137474. DOI: 10.5812/numonthly-137474

14. Petca R, Popescu R, Salaheddin Y, Mareş C, Petca A. Results of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in Patients Previous Operated vs. FirstTime Intervention. Romanian Journal of Urology. 2021;20(1):19-24.

15. Reddy SV, Shaik AB. Outcome and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for renal calculi. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42(2):262-269. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0619

16. Singh Ak.K, Deb P., Adhikari H. Outcomes of PCNL in Patients With and Without Previous Ipsilateral Stone Surgery. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 2020;19(11 Ser.7):51-55.

17. Gulani A, Kumar U, Yadav SS, Vohra RR, Singh VK. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in previously operated patients: A prospective study. Urol Ann. 2021;13(1):24-29. DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_175_19

18. Ozgor F, Kucuktopcu O, Sarılar O, Toptas M, Simsek A, Gurbuz ZG, Akbulut MF, Muslumanoglu AY, Binbay M. Does previous open renal surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy affect the outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):541- 547. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0798-9

19. Borofsky MS, Wollin DA, Reddy T, Shah O, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE. Salvage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Analysis of Outcomes following Initial Treatment Failure. J Urol. 2016;195(4 Pt 1):977-981. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.176