Expression of exosomal microRNAs miR-34a and miR-210 in male infertility: relationship with morphokinetic parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation

Introduction. Infertility affects tens of millions of men and women across the globe. In approximately half of cases, male factors are the cause of infertility. In recent decades, there has been a significant decline in the quality of male ejaculate, which is characterized by reduced sperm concentration and motility. The insufficient diagnostic and prognostic value of routine semen analysis results highlights the challenge of developing effective diagnostic tools and searching for reliable biomarkers of male infertility. One of the most promising approaches may be assessing sperm microRNA expression.

Objective. To study the role of sperm exosomal microRNAs miR-34a and miR-210 in the development of male infertility.

Materials & methods. The retrospective study included 150 men aged 25 – 49 years; of these, 96 patients were diagnosed with idiopathic infertility. The comparison group consisted of 54 fertile men. To assess the structure and motility of sperm, the results of a standard ejaculate study (WHO, 2021) and computer data analysis using MMC Sperm (MMCSoft, St. Petersburg, Russia) software were used. The degree of DNA fragmentation was assessed using the TUNEL method. To analyze the expression of miR-34a and miR-210, quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the miRCURY LNA SYBR Green PCR Kit («Qiagen» GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and the Rotor-Gene Q PCR product detection system («Qiagen» GmbH, Hilden, Germany).

Results. The study of ejaculate using the Computer Assisted Sperm Analysis System (CASA) method revealed a statistically significant relationship between the level of DNA fragmentation of sperm and indicators of the speed of their movement: rectilinear (VSL) (r = -0.522726; p < 0.01), curvilinear (VCL) (r = -0.499096; p < 0.01), along the middle path (VAP) (r = -0.429533; p < 0.01), as well as with the amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH) (r = -0.294779, p < 0.01), the linearity of their curvilinear path (LIN) (r = -0.385796; p < 0.01), the degree of straight-line movements (STR) (r = -0.268248; p < 0.05) and their progressive mobility (r = -0.411547; p < 0.01). A study of the level of microRNA expression in sperm exosomes revealed a statistically significant decrease in its miRNA-34a pool (p = 0.0116). According to the Chaddock scale, the strength of the correlation between miR-210 expression and the effectiveness of ART programs was moderate (0.437993). The inverse relationship between miR-34a expression and IVF and ICSI results was weak (0.135314).

Conclusion. The analysis of exosomal microRNA-34a and microRNA-210, which are involved in the regulation of spermatogenesis, reveals a direct correlation between their variations and changes in the kinetic and morphological parameters of gametes. It also indicates a relationship with the state of DNA fragmentation. These findings suggest varying levels of gene expression among infertile patients, men with proven fertility, and those undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments, both with successful and repeated unsuccessful outcomes.

1. Carson SA, Kallen AN. Diagnosis and Management of Infertility: A Review. JAMA. 2021;326(1):65-76. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.4788

2. Bozhedomov V.A., Korneev I.A., Lipatova N.A., Bozhedomova G.E., Kamarina R.A., Nikolaeva M.A., Galimova E.F., Galimov Sh.N., Yepanchintseva E.A., Pavlov V.N., Kamalov A.A. Reference values for basic ejaculate analysis from fertile men: Russian regional characteristics (multicenter cross-sectional retrospective study). Urologiia. 2023;5:55-62. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2023.5.48-56

3. Agarwal A, Baskaran S, Parekh N, Cho CL, Henkel R, Vij S, Arafa M, Panner Selvam MK, Shah R. Male infertility. Lancet. 2021;397(10271):319-333. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32667-2

4. Podgrajsek R, Hodzic A, Stimpfel M, Kunej T, Peterlin B. Insight into the complexity of male infertility: a multi-omics review. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2024;70(1):73-90. DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2024.2317804

5. Galimov Sh.N., Ahmetov R.M., Galimova E.F., Bayramgulov F.M., Bikkulova L.R. Molekular aspekts of the impact of the speroton comlex on the male fertility in idiopathic infertility. Urologiia. 2017;2:88-92. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urol.2017.2.88-92

6. Wagner AO, Turk A, Kunej T. Towards a Multi-Omics of Male Infertility. World J Mens Health. 2023;41(2):272-288. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.220186

7. Gromenko Yu.Yu., Gromenko I.D., Galimova S.Sh., Galimova E.F., Gromenko D.D., Bulygin K.V., Shelestova O.S., Ryagin S.N., Galimov Sh.N., Yashchuk A.G. Role and place of microRNAs in the pathogenesis of infertility. Vopr. Ginekol. Akus. perinatol. (Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology). 2023; 22(6): 65-72. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20953/1726-1678-2023-6-65-72

8. Burgos CF, Cikutovic R, Alarcón M. MicroRNA expression in male infertility. Reprod Fertil DeV. 2022;34(12):805-818. DOI: 10.1071/RD21131

9. Sendler E, Johnson GD, Mao S, Goodrich RJ, Diamond MP, Hauser R, Krawetz SA. Stability, delivery and functions of human sperm RNAs at fertilization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(7):4104-4117. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt132

10. Dmitrieva M.L., Tikhonovskaya O.A., Petrov I.A., Logvinov S.V. Expression of miR-181a and miR-146a in primary ovarian insufficiency of autoimmune. Vopr ginekol akus perinatol (Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology). 2022;21(2):85-89. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20953/1726-1678-2022-2-85-89

11. Pantos K, Grigoriadis S, Tomara P, Louka I, Maziotis E, Pantou A, Nitsos N, Vaxevanoglou T, Kokkali G, Agarwal A, Sfakianoudis K, Simopoulou M. Investigating the Role of the microRNA-34/449 Family in Male Infertility: A Critical Analysis and Review of the Literature. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:709943. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.709943

12. Galimov Sh.N., Gromenko I.D., Galimov K.Sh., Gromenko R.I., Gromenko D.D., Muratov E.M., Litvitsky P.F. Computer analysis of ejaculate CASA: advantages and prospects. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. 2023;18(1):92-95. (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 50364654; EDN: NBLPED

13. Finelli R, Leisegang K, Tumallapalli S, Henkel R, Agarwal A. The validity and reliability of computer-aided semen analyzers in performing semen analysis: a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(7):3069-3079. DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-276

14. Lin HT, Wu MH, Wu WL, Tsai LC, Chen YY, Hung KH, Wu PH, Chen TS, Ou HT, Cheng YS. Incorporating sperm DNA fragmentation index with computer-assisted semen morphokinematic parameters as a better window to male fertility. Chin J Physiol. 2022;65(3):143-150. DOI: 10.4103/CJP.CJP_12_22

15. Aghazarian A, Huf W, Pflüger H, Klatte T. Standard Semen Parameters vs. Sperm Kinematics to Predict Sperm DNA Damage. World J Mens Health. 2021;39(1):116-122. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.190095

16. Xie Y, Wu C, Chen W, Wu Z, Cai G, Hong L. Extracellular vesicles-encapsulated microRNA in mammalian reproduction: A review. Theriogenology. 2023;196:174-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.11.022

17. Bahmyari S, Khatami SH, Taghvimi S, Rezaei Arablouydareh S, Taheri-Anganeh M, Ghasemnejad-Berenji H, Farazmand T, Soltani Fard E, Solati A, Movahedpour A, Ghasemi H. MicroRNAs in Male Fertility. DNA Cell Biol. 2024;43(3):108-124. DOI: 10.1089/dna.2023.0314

18. Xu YW, Ou NJ, Song YX, Wang XH, Kang JQ, Yang YJ, Chen YG, Liu XQ. Seminal plasma miR-210-3p induces spermatogenic cell apoptosis by activating caspase-3 in patients with varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2020;22(5):513-518. DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_114_19

19. Galimov SN, Gromenko JY, Bulygin KV, Galimov KS, Galimova EF, Sinelnikov MY. The level of secondary messengers and the redox state of NAD+/NADH are associated with sperm quality in infertility. J Reprod Immunol. 2021;148:103383. DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2021.103383

20. Zhao MJ, Zhang YN, Zhao YP, Chen XB, Han BS, Ding N, Gu YQ, Wang SS, Ma J, Liu ML. Altered microRNA expression profiles of human spermatozoa in normal fertile men of different ages. Asian J Androl. 2023;25(6):737-744. DOI: 10.4103/aja20238