Evidence-based efficacy, safety and technical features of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (systematic review of meta-analyses)
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-2-87-107
Abstract
To date, the literature presents a wide data regarding the effectiveness, safety, and technical features of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A significant proportion of studies are presented in the format of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. This article presents an analysis of the accumulated data was carried out in the form of a systematic review of meta-analyses.
About the Authors
V. A. Malkhasyan
Russian University of Medicine (RosUniMed); Botkin City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Vigen A. Malkhasyan — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med); Prof., Dept. of Urology, Russian University of Medicine; Head, Urology Division No. 67, Botkin City Clinical Hospital
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
N. K. Gadzhiev
Pirogov Clinic of Advanced Medical Technologies — St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Nariman K. Gadzhiev — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med); Deputy Director for the Medical (Urology)
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
S. O. Sukhikh
Botkin City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Sergey O. Sukhikh — M.D., Сand.Sc.(Med); Urologist, Urol
ogy Division No. 67
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
D. Yu. Pushkar
Russian University of Medicine (RosUniMed); Botkin City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Dmitry Yu. Pushkar — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof., Acad. of the RAS; Head, Dept. of Urology, Russian University of Medicine; Head, Moscow Urological Centre, Botkin City Clinical Hospital
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Chen Y, Feng J, Duan H, Yue Y, Zhang C, Deng T, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0206810. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206810
2. Chung DY, Kang DH, Cho KS, Jeong WS, Jung HD, Kwon JK, Lee SH, Lee JY. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211316
3. Liu Y, Zhang H, Wen Z, Jiang Y, Huang J, Wang C, Chen C, Wang J, Bao E, Yang X. Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones (>1 cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):171. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01341-3
4. De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R, Torricelli FC, Di Palma C, Molina WR, Monga M, De Sio M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):125-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003
5. Jiang H, Yu Z, Chen L, Wang T, Liu Z, Liu J, Wang S, Ye Z. Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2035851. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2035851
6. Davis NF, Quinlan MR, Poyet C, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton DM, Webb D, Jack GS. Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile. World J Urol. 2018;36(7):1127-1138. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2230-x
7. Jiao B, Luo Z, Xu X, Zhang M, Zhang G. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of upper urinary stones - A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019;71:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.005
8. Chen Y, Wen Y, Yu Q, Duan X, Wu W, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):109. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-020-00677-4
9. Dorantes-Carrillo LA, Basulto-Martínez M, Suárez-Ibarrola R, Heinze A, Proietti S, Flores-Tapia JP, Esqueda-Mendoza A, Giusti G. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(1):259-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.02.008
10. Gao XS, Liao BH, Chen YT, Feng SJ, Gao R, Luo DY, Liu JM, Wang KJ. Different Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2017;31(11):1101-1110. DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0547
11. Zheng C, Xiong B, Wang H, Luo J, Zhang C, Wei W, Wang Y. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2014;93(4):417-24. DOI: 10.1159/000363509
12. Kang SK, Cho KS, Kang DH, Jung HD, Kwon JK, Lee JY. Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm: An update. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(49):e9119. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009119
13. Zewu Z, Cui Y, Feng Z, Yang L, Chen H. Comparison of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating intermediate size renal stones (2-3cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45(1):10-22. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0510
14. Kim CH, Chung DY, Rha KH, Lee JY, Lee SH. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 30;57(1):26. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57010026
15. Barone B, Crocetto F, Vitale R, Di Domenico D, Caputo V, Romano F, De Luca L, Bada M, Imbimbo C, Prezioso D. Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72(4):441-450. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03721-2
16. Awedew AF, Seman YS, Yalew DZ, Wondmeneh YC, Yigzaw WA. Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment for 1-2 cm sized lower pole of renal stone: network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Urolithiasis. 2023;51(1):82. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-023-01454-2
17. Donaldson JF, Lardas M, Scrimgeour D, Stewart F, MacLennan S, Lam TB, McClinton S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol. 2015;67(4):612-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054
18. Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, Gao X, Peng Y, Xu C, Chen Q, Song R, Sun Y. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):745-59. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0799
19. Yuri P, Hariwibowo R, Soeroharjo I, Danarto R, Hendri AZ, Brodjonegoro SR, Rasyid N, Birowo P, Widyahening IS. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Acta Med Indones. 2018;50(1):18-25. PMID: 29686172
20. Junbo L, Yugen L, Guo J, Jing H, Ruichao Y, Tao W. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Urol J. 2019;16(2):97-106. DOI: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4681
21. Cabrera JD, Manzo BO, Torres JE, Vicentini FC, Sánchez HM, Rojas EA, Lozada E. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20 mm lower pole renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2020;38(10):2621-2628. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03043-8
22. Tsai SH, Chung HJ, Tseng PT, Wu YC, Tu YK, Hsu CW, Lei WT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(10):e19403. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019403
23. Kallidonis P, Adamou C, Ntasiotis P, Pietropaolo A, Somani B, Özsoy M, Liourdi D, Sarica K, Liatsikos E, Tailly T. The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of UroTechnology and Young Academic Urologists. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(6):711-723. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04388-3
24. Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P, Somani B, Adamou C, Emiliani E, Knoll T, Skolarikos A, Tailly T. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter. J Urol. 2020;204(3):427-433. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001013
25. Liu M, Hou J, Xu F, Du H, Liu J, Li N. Minimally invasive nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of Lower calyceal stones: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023;109(5):1481-1488. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000394
26. Hou J, Xu F, Du H, Liu J, Li N. Efficacy and safety of the surgical treatments for lower calyceal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023;109(3):383-388. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000062
27. Wang X, Li S, Liu T, Guo Y, Yang Z. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2013;190(3):888-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092
28. Wang J, Yang Y, Chen M, Tao T, Liu C, Huang Y, Guan H, Han X, Xu B. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal pelvic calculi (diameter >2 cm): a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2016;116(6):346-356. DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1181312
29. Rui X, Hu H, Yu Y, Yu S, Zhang Z. Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large renal pelvic stones: a meta-analysis. J Investig Med. 2016;64(6):1134-42. DOI: 10.1136/jim-2015-000053
30. Zhao C, Yang H, Tang K, Xia D, Xu H, Chen Z, Ye Z. Comparison of laparoscopic stone surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large upper urinary stones: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(6):479-490. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0862-0
31. Bai Y, Tang Y, Deng L, Wang X, Yang Y, Wang J, Han P. Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):75. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7
32. Mao T, Wei N, Yu J, Lu Y. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(1):300060520983136. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520983136
33. Mantica G, Balzarini F, Chierigo F, Keller EX, Talso M, Emiliani E, Pietropaolo A, Papalia R, Scarpa RM, Terrone C, Esperto F; European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU) and Young Academic Urologists (YAU). The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(2):169-177. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04587-0
34. Wang Q, Guo J, Hu H, Lu Y, Zhang J, Qin B, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Wang S. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171478. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171478
35. Gao ZM, Gao S, Qu HC, Li K, Li N, Liu CL, Zhu XW, Liu YL, Wang P, Zheng XH. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy improves stone-free rates for impacted proximal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171230. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171230
36. Wu T, Duan X, Chen S, Yang X, Tang T, Cui S. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Per-cutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2017;99(3):308-319. DOI: 10.1159/000471773
37. Wang Y, Chang X, Li J, Han Z. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(6):902-926. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0550
38. Lai S, Jiao B, Diao T, Seery S, Hu M, Wang M, Hou H, Wang J, Zhang G, Liu M. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2020;80:205-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025
39. Sharma G, Pareek T, Tyagi S, Kaundal P, Yadav AK, Thummala Y, Devana SK. Comparison of efficacy and safety of various management options for large upper ureteric stones a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11811. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91364-3
40. Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, Lei M, Yuan J, Wan SP, Zeng G. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):563-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y
41. Feng D, Hu X, Tang Y, Han P, Wei X. The efficacy and safety of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61(2):115-126. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.2.115
42. Deng J, Li J, Wang L, Hong Y, Zheng L, Hu J, Kuang R. Standard versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a meta-analysis. Scand J Surg. 2021;110(3):301-311. DOI: 10.1177/1457496920920474
43. Sharma G, Sharma A, Devana SK, Singh SK. Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Renal Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1376-1385. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.014
44. Wan C, Wang D, Xiang J, Yang B, Xu J, Zhou G, Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Zhong J, Liu J. Comparison of postoperative outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(5):523-533. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01349-8
45. Mykoniatis I, Pietropaolo A, Pyrgidis N, Tishukov M, Anastasiadis A, Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, Talso M, Tailly T, Kalidonis P; Young Academic Urologists of the European Association of Urology-Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Party. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of renal stones over 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(4):409-417. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04678-X
46. Qin P, Zhang D, Huang T, Fang L, Cheng Y. Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48(4):637-648. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0347
47. Li H, Yin Y, Nie M. Efficacy and safety of super-mini per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):87. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01256-z
48. Zeid M, Sayedin H, Sridharan N, Narayanaswamy A, Abul F, Jacob PT, Giri S, Sarica K, Almousawi S. Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Nephrolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e32253. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32253
49. Li X, Li J, Zhu W, Duan X, Zhao Z, Deng T, Duan H, Zeng G. Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206048. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206048
50. Gu Z, Yang Y, Ding R, Wang M, Pu J, Chen J. Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2021;105(1-2):64-70. DOI: 10.1159/000506716
51. Zhang B, Hu Y, Gao J, Zhuo D. Micropercutaneous versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Moderately Sized Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2020;104(1-2):94-105. DOI: 10.1159/000503796
52. Chen D, Chen C, Xie Y, Luo Z, Liu G. Suctioning Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urol J. 2021;19(1):1-8. DOI: 10.22037/uj.v18i.6773
53. Zhu L, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Gou L, Huang Y, Zheng X. Comparison of vacuum-assisted sheaths and normal sheaths in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2021;21(1):158. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00925-1
54. Li P, Huang Z, Sun X, Yang T, Wang G, Jiang Y, Ke C, Li J. Comparison of Vacuum Suction Sheath and Non-Vacuum Suction Sheath in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. J Invest Surg. 2022;35(5):1145-1152. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1995538
55. He Z, Tang F, Lu Z, He Y, Wei G, Zhong F, Zeng G, Wu W, Yan L, Li Z. Comparison of Supracostal and Infracostal Access For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol J. 2019;16(2):107-114. DOI: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4727
56. Jiao B, Ding Z, Luo Z, Lai S, Xu X, Chen X, Zhang G. Single- versus Multiple-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Surgical Management of Staghorn Stones or Complex Caliceal Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8817070. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8817070
57. Wang Z, Feng D, Cao D, Zhang Y, Wei W. Comparison of safety and efficacy between single-tract and multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment of complex renal calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(6):731-738. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04239-9
58. Song R, Ji C, Cong R, Luan J, Yao L, Song N, Meng X. Is It Safe to Increase the Number of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Channels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Esp Urol. 2022;75(10):819-830. DOI: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227510.120
59. Widyokirono DR, Kloping YP, Hidayatullah F, Rahman ZA, Ng AC, Hakim L. Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large and Complex Renal Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(7):865-876. DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0761
60. Castellani D, Corrales M, Lim EJ, Cracco C, Scoffone CM, Teoh JY, Traxer O, Gauhar V. The Impact of Lasers in Per-cutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Comparative Trials. J Endourol. 2022;36(2):151-157. DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0507
61. Lin L, Zhou L, Xiao K, Jin X, Jian Z, Liu Y, Li H, Wang K. Does combined lithotripter show superior stone-success rate than ultrasonic or pneumatic device alone during percutaneous nephrolithotrotomy? A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2022;98:106223. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106223
62. Mykoniatis I, Pyrgidis N, Tzelves L, Pietropaolo A, Juliebø-Jones P, De Coninck V, Hameed BMZ, Chaloupka M, Schulz GB, Stief C, Kallidonis P, Somani BK, Skolarikos A. Assessment of single-probe dual-energy lithotripters in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies. World J Urol. 2023;41(2):551-565. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04278-2
63. Dehong C, Liangren L, Huawei L, Qiang W. A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(6):523-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0598-z
64. Li Y, Yang L, Xu P, Shen P, Qian S, Wei W, Wang J. One-shot versus gradual dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(5):443-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0583-6
65. Peng PX, Lai SC, Seery S, He YH, Zhao H, Wang XM, Zhang G. Balloon versus Amplatz for tract dilation in fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e035943. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035943
66. Yuan H, Zheng S, Liu L, Han P, Wang J, Wei Q. The effi-cacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Res. 2011;39(5):401-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0355-5
67. Ni S, Qiyin C, Tao W, Liu L, Jiang H, Hu H, Han R, Wang C. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with less pain and shorter hospitalization compared with standard or small bore drainage: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Urology. 2011;77(6):1293-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.023
68. Wang J, Zhao C, Zhang C, Fan X, Lin Y, Jiang Q. Tubeless vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2012;109(6):918-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10463.x
69. Shen P, Liu Y, Wang J. Nephrostomy tube-free versus nephrostomy tube for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2012;88(3):298-306. DOI: 10.1159/000332151
70. Zhong Q, Zheng C, Mo J, Piao Y, Zhou Y, Jiang Q. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2013;27(4):420-6. DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0421
71. Xun Y, Wang Q, Hu H, Lu Y, Zhang J, Qin B, Geng Y, Wang S. Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):102. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2
72. Lee JY, Jeh SU, Kim MD, Kang DH, Kwon JK, Ham WS, Choi YD, Cho KS. Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):48. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x
73. Li Q, Gao L, Li J, Zhang Y, Jiang Q. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020;29(2):61-69. DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1581224
74. Chen ZJ, Yan YJ, Zhou JJ. Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(1):60-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.01.016
75. Gauhar V, Traxer O, García Rojo E, Scarcella S, Pavia MP, Chan VW, Pretore E, Wroclawski ML, Corrales M, Tiong HY, Lim EJ, Teoh JY, Heng CT, de la Rosette J, Somani BK, Castellani D. Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(5):511-522. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01337-y
76. Wilhelm K, Hein S, Kunath F, Schoenthaler M, Schmidt S. Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;7(7):CD012607. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2
77. Wang J, Zhang C, Tan G, Yang B, Chen W, Tan D. The use of adjunctive hemostatic agents in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(6):509-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-014-0717-5
78. Yu C, Xu Z, Long W, Longfei L, Feng Z, Lin Q, Xiongbing Z, Hequn C. Hemostatic agents used for nephrostomy tract closure after tubeless PCNL: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(5):445-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-014-0687-7
79. Chen Y, Feng J, Yue Y, Zhao Z, Deng T, Wu W, Zeng G. Externalized Ureteral Catheter Versus Double-J Stent in Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2018;32(7):581-588. DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0066
80. Pu C, Wang J, Tang Y, Yuan H, Li J, Bai Y, Wang X, Wei Q, Han P. The efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(5):455-66. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0776-2
81. Hu H, Qin B, He D, Lu Y, Zhao Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang S. Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126587. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126587
82. Liu X, Huang G, Zhong R, Hu S, Deng R. Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Regional versus General Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Urol Int. 2018;101(2):132-142. DOI: 10.1159/000491021
83. Liu L, Zheng S, Xu Y, Wei Q. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone position. J Endourol. 2010;24(12):1941-6. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0292
84. Wu P, Wang L, Wang K. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43(1):67-77. DOI:10.1007/s11255-010-9801-0
85. Zhang X, Xia L, Xu T, Wang X, Zhong S, Shen Z. Is the supine position superior to the prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)? Urolithiasis. 2014;42(1):87-93. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0614-3
86. Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, Cheng T, Sun Z, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen W, Zhong W, Zhu J. Supine Versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2016;30(7):754-63. DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0402
87. Li J, Gao L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Jiang Q. Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019;66:62-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.016
88. Birowo P, Tendi W, Widyahening IS, Rasyid N, Atmoko W. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res. 2020;9:231. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.22940.3
89. Keller EX, DE Coninck V, Proietti S, Talso M, Emiliani E, Ploumidis A, Mantica G, Somani B, Traxer O, Scarpa RM, Esperto F; European Association of Urology - European Society of Residents in Urology (EAU-ESRU). Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(1):50-58. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03960-0
90. Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Teimoori M. An Update on Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-analysis. Urol J. 2016;13(5):2814-2822.
91. Wang K, Zhang P, Xu X, Fan M. Ultrasonographic versus Fluoroscopic Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2015;95(1):15-25. DOI: 10.1159/000369216
92. Liu Q, Zhou L, Cai X, Jin T, Wang K. Fluoroscopy versus ultrasound for image guidance during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2017;45(5):481-487. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0934-1
93. Yang YH, Wen YC, Chen KC, Chen C. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2019;37(5):777-788. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2443-z
94. Arabzadeh Bahri R, Maleki S, Shafiee A, Shobeiri P. Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0276708. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276708
95. Wang L, Li KP, Yin S, Yang L, Zhu PY. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with a non-dilated collecting system: results of a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):93. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01269-8
96. Ma Y, Li P, Xiang L, Wen J, Jin X. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound vs Conventional Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Nondilated Collecting System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endourol. 2023;37(3):264-272. DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0360
97. Hu H, Lu Y, Cui L, Zhang J, Zhao Z, Qin B, Wang Y, Wang Q, Wang S. Impact of previous open renal surgery on the outcomes of subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e010627. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010627
98. Pan Y, Xu M, Kang J, Wang S, Liu X. The Safety of Continuing Low-dose Aspirin Therapy Perioperatively in the Patients had Undergone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urol J. 2022;19(4):253-261. DOI: 10.22037/uj.v19i.7170
99. Wang Z, He X, Bai Y, Wang J. Can tranexamic acid reduce the blood transfusion rate in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(4):300060520917563. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520917563
100. Feng D, Zhang F, Liu S, Han P, Wei W. Efficacy and safety of the tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72(5):579-585. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03826-6
101. Lee MJ, Kim JK, Tang J, Ming JM, Chua ME. The Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Perioperative Bleeding After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. J Endourol. 2022;36(3):303-312. DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0498
102. Kallidonis P, Vagionis A, Pagonis K, Peteinaris A, Pietropaolo A, Adamou C, Liatsikos E, Tailly T. Is There Any Clinical Benefit for Peri-operative Administration of Tranexamic Acid for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22(12):65. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01079-1
103. MacDonald M, Ilie G, Power L, Whalen S, Parker R, Skinner TA, Powers AGL. Effect of Tranexamic Acid on Bleeding Outcomes After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endourol. 2022;36(5):589-597. DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0762
104. Baccaglini W, Rodrigues AF, Glina FPA, DallAqua V, Glina S, Neto ACL. Tranexamic Acid Use for Hemorrhagic Events Prevention in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(7):906-915. DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0792
105. Prasad S, Sharma G, Devana SK, Kumar S, Sharma S. Is tranexamic acid associated with decreased need for blood transfusion in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023;105(2):99-106. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0259
106. Bapir R, Bhatti KH, Eliwa A, García-Perdomo HA, Gherabi N, Hennessey D, Mourmouris P, Ouattara A, Perletti G, Philipraj J, Trinchieri A, Buchholz N. Infectious complications of endourological treatment of kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022;94(1):97-106. DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2022.1.97
107. Zhou G, Zhou Y, Chen R, Wang D, Zhou S, Zhong J, Zhao Y, Wan C, Yang B, Xu J, Geng E, Li G, Huang Y, Liu H, Liu J. The influencing factors of infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2022;51(1):17. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01376-5
108. Liu M, Chen J, Gao M, Zeng H, Cui Y, Zhu Z, Chen H. Preoperative Midstream Urine Cultures vs Renal Pelvic Urine Culture or Stone Culture in Predicting Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Urosepsis After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2021;35(10):1467-1478. DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.1140
109. Castellani D, Teoh JY, Pavia MP, Pretore E, Dell'Atti L, Galosi AB, Gauhar V. Assessing the Optimal Urine Culture for Predicting Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(2):158-168. DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0386
110. Yu J, Guo B, Yu J, Chen T, Han X, Niu Q, Xu S, Guo Z, Shi Q, Peng X, Deng Z, Yang P. Antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol. 2020;38(7):1685-1700. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02967-5
111. Jung HD, Cho KS, Moon YJ, Chung DY, Kang DH, Lee JY. Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267233. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267233
112. Danilovic A, Talizin TB, Torricelli FCM, Marchini GS, Batagello C, Vicentini FC, Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E. One week pre-operative oral antibiotics for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduce risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2023;49(2):184-193. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0544
113. Jones P, Bennett G, Dosis A, Pietropaolo A, Geraghty R, Aboumarzouk O, Skolarikos A, Somani BK. Safety and Efficacy of Day-case Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from European Society of Uro-technology. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(6):1127-1134. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.04.002
114. Gao M, Zeng F, Zhu Z, Zeng H, Chen Z, Li Y, Yang Z, Cui Y, He C, Chen J, Chen H. Day care surgery versus inpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020;81:132-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.056
115. Peng L, Meng C, Xia Z, Liang R, Gan L, Li K, Cao D, Li Y. Determining the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treating nephrolithiasis in patients with solitary kidneys. Urolithiasis. 2022;51(1):2. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01386-3
116. Jiang K, Zhang P, Xu B, Luo G, Hu J, Zhu J, Sun F. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger than 2cm in Patients with a Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. Urol J. 2020;17(5):442-448. DOI: 10.22037/uj.v16i7.5609
117. Zhou X, Sun X, Chen X, Gong X, Yang Y, Chen C, Yao Q. Effect of Obesity on Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2017;98(4):382-390. DOI: 10.1159/000455162
Review
For citations:
Malkhasyan V.A., Gadzhiev N.K., Sukhikh S.O., Pushkar D.Yu. Evidence-based efficacy, safety and technical features of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (systematic review of meta-analyses). Urology Herald. 2024;12(2):87-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-2-87-107
Views:
993
Email this article 
