Optimal intestinal graft selection for reconstruction of extended ureteral stricture: an animal model study
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-1-45-59
Abstract
Introduction. The prevalence of patients with extended ureteral strictures has been steadily increasing over the past decades. When it is not possible to perform reconstruction with the tissues of the urinary system, the best solution is intestinal replacement plasty. However, despite the great world experience, the search for the optimal method of intestinal reconstruction does not stop, which determines the relevance of conducting an experimental prospective study.
Objective. To evaluate morphological changes in renal parenchyma after ureteral replacement reconstruction by segments of small and large intestine.
Materials & methods. Fifteen white giant rabbits (6-months-old, weighing 5 kg) were divided into three groups. Group A (n = 5) underwent small intestine [ilealplasty] replacement plasty. Group B (n = 5) double-flap ileoplasty using the Yang-Monti technique. Group C (n = 5) – large intestine [coloplasy] ureteral reconstruction. Before the operation and before withdrawal from the experiment, the level of creatinine and electrolytes was assessed, kidney ultrasound was performed on days 2, 5, 10. Excretory urography was performed to assess the patency of the anastomoses. Animals were withdrawn from the experiment from day 10 to 30. The material used for morphological study included kidneys from the operated and intact sides, proximal and distal anastomoses.
Results. No increase in creatinine level, metabolic disorders were detected in animals. According to ultrasound data, hydronephrosis developed in all animals on day 2 and remained unchanged during the entire follow-up. Group A: no complications were detected. Histologically, the renal parenchyma showed moderate signs of chronic inflammation, single foci of lymphoid infiltration, but there were no irreversible processes in the form of necrosis and sclerosis. Group B: complications — stricture in the anastomosis area of the detubularised fragments and necrosis of the small intestine due to compression of the mesentery by the graft vascular stem. Histologically there were marked dilatation of the tubules at all levels, enlargement of the Bowman-Shumlansky capsule, as well as signs of moderate inflammatory process, there were hydropic and hyaline-droplet dystrophy, tubular necrosis foci. Group C: complications — accumulation of a significant amount of grit, mucus, and fibrin in the colocystoanastomosis area. Histologically, the renal parenchyma showed a marked inflammatory process, in particular, purulent inflammation with demarcation zones, infiltration with polymorphonuclear leukocytes and bacterial cells, foci of necrosis and sclerosis of both stroma and tubules, dilatation of tubules and Bowman-Schumlansky capsules.
Conclusion. The use of an unchanged ileal-graft reconstruction of an extended ureteral defect showed acceptable histological results in an animal model, which confirms the feasibility of its use in clinical practice. The absence of foci of necrosis and fibrosis in the renal parenchyma indicates the preserved functional potential, which suggests the stabilization of renal function in the long term.
About the Authors
S. V. KotovRussian Federation
Sergey V. Kotov — M.D., Dr.Sc. (Med), Full Prof.; Head, Dept. of Urology and Andrology; Urologist, Urology Division,; Head
Moscow
R. I. Guspanov
Russian Federation
Renat I. Guspanov — M.D., Cand.Sc.(Med); Assoc.Prof., Dept. of Urology and Andrology; Urologist, Urology Division, Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No.1; Oncologist
Moscow
A. G. Yusufov
Russian Federation
Anvar G. Yusufov — M.D., Cand.Sc.(Med); Assoc.Prof., Dept. of Urology and Andrology; Head, Urology Division
Moscow
O. V. Gaina
Russian Federation
Oksana V. Gaina — M.D.; Postgrad. Student, Dept. of Urology and Andrology
Moscow
A. L. Aprosimov
Russian Federation
Alexander L. Aprosimov — Student
Moscow
I. V. Lapin
Russian Federation
Igor V. Lapin — Student
Moscow
M. M. Zobnin
Russian Federation
Mikhail Maksimovich Zobnin — Student
Moscow
N. O. Larionova
Russian Federation
Natalia O. Larionova — Student
Moscow
N. V. Trykina
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Trykina — M.D.; Head, Pathology Division
Zelenograd, Moscow
T. Yu. Luskatova
Russian Federation
Tatyana Yu. Luskatova — M.D.; Pathologist, Pathology Division
Zelenograd, Moscow
O. V. Bogdanova
Russian Federation
Olga V. Bogdanova — M.D.; Pathologist, Pathology Division
Zelenograd, Moscow
References
1. Zhong W, Hong P, Ding G, Yang K, Li X, Bao J, Bao G, Cui L, Men C, Li Z, Zhang P, Chu N, Zhou L. Technical considerations and outcomes for ileal ureter replacement: a retrospective study in China. BMC Surg. 2019;19(1):9. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0472-1
2. Gild P, Kluth LA, Vetterlein MW, Engel O, Chun FKH, Fisch M. Adult iatrogenic ureteral injury and stricture-incidence and treatment strategies. Asian J Urol. 2018;5(2):101-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.02.003
3. Komyakov B.K., Al-Attar T.Kh., Guliev B.G. Intestinal and appendicular reconstruction of the ureters. Urologiia. 2021;(2):14-20. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2021.2.14-20
4. Katibov M.I., Bogdanov A.B., Dovlatov Z.A. Ureteroplasty using oral mucosa graft: a literature review. Update in 2022. Urology Herald. 2022;10(3):84-97. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-3-84-97
5. Loran O.B., Sinyakova L.A., Seregin A.V., Tverdokhlebov N.E., Dovlatov Z.A., Tekeev M.A. Use of isolated intestinal segments in surgical treatment of radiation-induced lesions of the urinary tract. Urologiia. 2012;(2):20-24. (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 18064686; EDN: PFIBCD
6. Xiong S, Zhu W, Li X, Zhang P, Wang H, Li X. Intestinal interposition for complex ureteral reconstruction: A comprehensive review. Int J Urol. 2020;27(5):377-386. DOI: 10.1111/iju.14222
7. Komyakov B.K., Guliev B.G. The results of laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement. Urology Herald. 2015;(4):16-28. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2015-0-4-16-28
8. Kocot A, Kalogirou C, Vergho D, Riedmiller H. Long-term results of ileal ureteric replacement: a 25-year single-centre experience. BJU Int. 2017;120(2):273-279. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13825
9. Roth JD, Monn MF, Szymanski KM, Bihrle R, Mellon MJ. Ureteral Reconstruction With Ileum: Long-term Follow-up of Renal Function. Urology. 2017;104:225-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.02.026
10. Yang WH. Yang needle tunneling technique in creating antireflux and continent mechanisms. J Urol. 1993;150(3):830-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35625-2
11. Monti PR, Lara RC, Dutra MA, de Carvalho JR. New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. Urology. 1997;49(1):112-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00503-1
12. Poza A, Marzullo L, García G, Reig C. Reparación de lesiones ureterales complejas: presentación de tres casos clínicos y análisis de las diferentes opciones terapéuticas [Surgical repair of complex ureteral injuries: three clinical cases and analysis of different technical approaches.]. Arch Esp Urol. 2022;75(1):77-81. (In Spanish). PMID: 35173069.
13. Ubrig B, Roth S. Reconfigured colon segments as a ureteral substitute. World J Urol. 2003;21(3):119-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-003-0320-9
14. Tscholl R, Tettamanti F, Zingg E. Ileal substitute of ureter with reflux-plasty by terminal intussusception of bowel: animal experiments and clinical experience. Urology. 1977;9(4):385-9. DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(77)90211-4
15. Chevalier RL, Thornhill BA, Forbes MS, Kiley SC. Mechanisms of renal injury and progression of renal disease in congenital obstructive nephropathy. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(4):687-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-009-1316-5
16. Narváez Barros A, Guiteras R, Sola A, Manonelles A, Morote J, Cruzado JM. Reversal Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction: A Mice Experimental Model. Nephron. 2019;142(2):125-134. DOI: 10.1159/000497119
17. Docherty NG, O'Sullivan OE, Healy DA, Fitzpatrick JM, Watson RW. Evidence that inhibition of tubular cell apoptosis protects against renal damage and development of fibrosis following ureteric obstruction. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290(1):F4-13. DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00045.2005
18. Chen L, Yang Y, Yang J, He P, Amend B, Stenzl A, Hu J, Zhang Y, Wang Z. Suture causing urethral meatus stricture: A novel animal model of partial bladder outlet obstruction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(7):2088-2096. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23427
19. Truong LD, Farhood A, Tasby J, Gillum D. Experimental chronic renal ischemia: morphologic and immunologic studies. Kidney Int. 1992;41(6):1676-89. DOI: 10.1038/ki.1992.241
20. Li S, Wang Y, Wang Z, Chen L, Zuo B, Liu C, Sun D. Enhanced renoprotective effect of GDNF-modified adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on renal interstitial fibrosis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):27. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-020-02049-z
21. Truong LD, Gaber L, Eknoyan G. Obstructive uropathy. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;169:311-326. DOI: 10.1159/000314578
22. Pons M, Leporq B, Ali L, Alison M, Albuquerque M, Peuchmaur M, Poli Mérol ML, Blank U, Lambert SA, El Ghoneimi A. Renal parenchyma impairment characterization in partial unilateral ureteral obstruction in mice with intravoxel incoherent motion-MRI. NMR Biomed. 2018;31(2). DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3858
23. Liu B, Ding FX, Liu Y, Xiong G, Lin T, He DW, Zhang YY, Zhang DY, Wei GH. Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells conditioned medium attenuate interstitial fibrosis and stimulate the repair of tubular epithelial cells in an irreversible model of unilateral ureteral obstruction. Nephrology (Carlton). 2018;23(8):728-736. DOI: 10.1111/nep.13099
24. Ali-El-Dein B, El-Hefnawy AS, D' Elia G, El-Mekresh MM, Shokeir AA, Gad H, Bazeed MA. Long-term Outcome of Yang-Monti Ileal Replacement of the Ureter: A Technique Suitable for Mild, Moderate Loss of Kidney Function and Solitary Kidney. Urology. 2021;152:153-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.061
25. Steffens JA, Anheuser P, Reisch B, Treiyer AE. Harnleiterrekonstruktion mit rekonfigurierten Ileumsegmenten nach Yang-Monti. Prospektiver 4-Jahres-Bericht [Ureteric reconstruction with reconfigured ileal segments according to Yang-Monti. A 4-year prospective report]. Urologe A. 2010;49(2):262-7. (In German). DOI: 10.1007/s00120-009-2177-z
26. Kochkin A.D., Gallyamov E.A., Popov S.V., Biktimirov R.G., Sanzharov A.E., Sergeev V.P., Sevryukov F.A., Orlov I.N., Novikov A.B. Laparoscopic replacement intestinal plastics of the ureters. Results of the first 40 operations. Urologiia. 2018;(5);5-12. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2018.4.5-12
27. Launer BM, Redger KD, Koslov DS, Sax-Bolder AN, Higuchi TT, Windsperger AP, Flynn BJ. Long-term Follow Up of Ileal Ureteral Replacement for Complex Ureteral Strictures: Single Institution Study. Urology. 2021;157:257-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.07.012
Review
For citations:
Kotov S.V., Guspanov R.I., Yusufov A.G., Gaina O.V., Aprosimov A.L., Lapin I.V., Zobnin M.M., Larionova N.O., Trykina N.V., Luskatova T.Yu., Bogdanova O.V. Optimal intestinal graft selection for reconstruction of extended ureteral stricture: an animal model study. Urology Herald. 2024;12(1):45-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-1-45-59