Urinary Tract Drainage Selection in Case of Pyelonephritis in Pregnant Women
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2019-7-4-35-42
Abstract
The article presents an analysis of the treatment results of 1122 patients with pyelonephritis in pregnancy at different gestational periods (from 6 to 39-40 weeks of pregnancy). The age of the patients was from 16 to 41 years, the average age was 26.15 ± 7 years. The indications and methods of urinary tract drainage in pregnant women were analyzed depending on the causes of urodynamic disturbances (kidney stone disease, decreased urinary tract tone, ureters compression by the uterus, vesico-urethral reflux) pregnancy term; pyelonephritis in pregnancy stage (serous/ purulent). Errors in the patients’ management after purulent pyelonephritis in pregnancy are considered. The expediency of examining and treating patients with risk factors for urinary tract infections during pregnancy were indicated at the stage of preparing a woman for pregnancy. Antegrade draining of the urinary tract is indicated for pregnant women from the 31st pregnancy week (and even shorter periods with a pronounced violation of urodynamics) with the presence of knee-shaped deviation in the ureter`s upper third and with suspected purulent process. Therefore, nephrostomy draining provides a more adequate outflow of urine from the affected kidney and makes it possible to control daily diuresis. It is necessary to conduct active monitoring of pregnant women with the presence of internal ureteral stents and their timely replacement. It is advisable to remove the drainage 3-4 weeks after birth, depending on the causes of the urodynamics` disorders. Symptom build-up dynamics, severity of intoxication, multi-organ lesion, the possibility of antenatal death of the fetus require urgent choice of the method of urinary tract drainage and the early initiation of intensive therapy in patients with suspected purulent process. Antimicrobial therapy should be carried out in accordance with the Russian guidelines on Urinary tract infections.
TThe study did not have sponsorship. The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
About the Authors
L. A. SinyakovaRussian Federation
Lyubov A. Sinyakova – M.D., Dr.Sc.(M), Full Professor; Professor, Dept. of Urology and Surgical Andrology
Urology Division
O. B. Loran
Russian Federation
Oleg B. Loran ‒ Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, M.D., Dr.Sc.(M), Full Professor; Chairman, Dept. of Urology and Surgical Andrology
Urology Division
I. V. Kosova
Russian Federation
Inga V. Kosova – M.D., Urologist, Cand.Sc.(M); Urology Division
tel.: +7 (926) 380-62-64
D. N. Kolbasov
Russian Federation
Dmitry N. Kolbasov ‒ M.D., Urologist, Cand.Sc.(M); Head, Urology Division
H. B. Tsitsaev
Russian Federation
Hussein B. Tsitsaev ‒ M.D., Urologist; Urology Division
References
1. Gilstrap LC, Ramin SM. Urinary tract infecTIons during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2001;28(3):581591. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70219-9
2. Szweda H, Jóźwik M. Urinary tract infecTIons during pregnancy - an updated overview. Dev Period Med. 2016;20(4):263- 272. PMID: 28216479
3. Cunningham FG, Morris GB, Mickal A. Acute pyelonephriTIs of pregnancy: a clinical review. Obstet Gynecol. 1973;42(1):112-117. PMID: 4720190
4. Gilstrap LC, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG, Whalley PJ, Roark ML. Renal infecTIon and pregnancy outcome. Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1981;141(6):709-716. DOI: 10.1016/s0002- 9378(15)33316-0
5. Puil L, Mail J, Wright JM. AsymptomaTIc bacteriuria during pregnancy, rapid answers using Cochrane library. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:58-60, 62-64. PMID: 11852613
6. Chilova R.A., Ischenko A.I., Rafalskiy V.V., Antonovich N.I., Belkina E.I., Gaysarova A.P., Maneeva E.S., Nedorozenuk I.V., Ocheretnaya E.V., Panova I.S., Suplotova O.V., Toropova I.A., Shevchenko N.P. AnTIbacterial Therapy Of Urinary Tract InfecTIons In Pregnancy: MulTIcenter Pharmacoepidemiological Study. Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases. 2006;55(1):38-43. (in Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 9483554
7. Karpov E.I., Anan’in A.M., Anan’in B.A. et al. Urologija i beremennost’. Metodicheskoe posobie. Rjazan’: OOO «RusBlank»; 2017. (in Russ.).
8. Nikonov A.P., Ascaturova O.R., KapTIl’nyj V.A. Infekcii m ochevyvodjashhih putej i beremennost’. Ginekologija. 2007;9(1):38-40. (in Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 20404704
9. Glaser AP, Schaeffer AJ. Urinary Tract InfecTIon and Bacteriuria in Pregnancy. Urol Clin North Am. 2015;42(4):547-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.05.004
10. Petrichko M.I., Chizhova G.V. Infekcii mochepolovoj sistemy u beremennyh zhenshhin. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 2002. (in Russ.).
11. Kan D.V. Rukovodstvo po akusherskoj i ginekologicheskoj urologii. Moskva: Medicina; 1978. (in Russ.).
12. Loran O.B., Sinjakova L.A., Kosova I.V. Algoritm diagnosTIki i lechenija infekcij mochevyh putej u beremennyh: Posobie dlja vrachej. Moskva: OOO”Medicinskoe informacionnoe agentstvo”; 2010. (in Russ.).
13. Kravchenko E.N., Gordeeva I.A., Naumkina E.V. Bessimptomnaja bakteriurija u beremennyh i ee oslozhnenija. Vestnik MANJeB Omskoj oblasƟ. 2014;1(4):27-30. (in Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 23367239
Review
For citations:
Sinyakova L.A., Loran O.B., Kosova I.V., Kolbasov D.N., Tsitsaev H.B. Urinary Tract Drainage Selection in Case of Pyelonephritis in Pregnant Women. Urology Herald. 2019;7(4):35-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2019-7-4-35-42