Preview

Urology Herald

Advanced search

DIAGNOSTIC CONSIDERATION OF RADIAL IMAGING METHODS IN IDENTIFYING LOCAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2015-0-3-68-78

Abstract

The diagnostic consideration of the most commonly used methods of radial diagnostics in identifying local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in patients with biochemical recurrence is reflected in the literature review. The identified level of PSA after radical prostatectomy can argue for both local recurrence, the presence of tumor dissemination, and a residual prostate tissue without tumor that was left on the edge of the cut. With the purpose of early diagnosis of prostate cancer recurrence, it is advisable to monitor PSA levels after 3 months after radical prostatectomy. In case of growth of PSA levels after radical prostatectomy, it is necessary to answer the question: whether the recurrence is local or metastatic. Modern imaging methods, such as transrectal ultrasound examination, bone scanning, multislice computed tomography, positron emission tomography and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging provide excluding or establishing the presence of recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. It should be noted that none of the methods of radiodiagnostics are not ahead of the results of PSA in the identification of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy; however, in their complex application, prostate cancer recurrent after radical prostatectomy can be visualized at its earliest stages.

 

About the Authors

E. A. Bezrukov
Urology Clinics named after R.M. Fronshteyn of the First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov
Russian Federation


E. L. Lachinov
Urology Clinics named after R.M. Fronshteyn of the First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov
Russian Federation


G. A. Martirosyan
Urology Clinics named after R.M. Fronshteyn of the First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov
Russian Federation


References

1. Алгоритмыдиагностикиилечениязлокачественныхновообразований. Подред. Член-корр. НАНБелоруси, д.м.н., проф. И.В. Залуцкого, д.м.н., проф. Э.А. Жаврида //Минск, 2007. – С. 351-372.

2. Возможности различных методов медицинской визуализации в диагно- стике причин биохимического рецидива после радикальной простатэктомии по поводу рака предстательной железы / Богушевич Е.В., Демешко П.Д., Красный С.А., Ролевич А.И. // Онкологический журнал. 2009. Том 3,№ 1. С. 65-71.

3. Применение иммуносцинтиграфиивдиагностикеракапредстательнойжелезы (Ill- Индиякапромабпендетайд, ProstaScint) / АляевЮ.Г., Винаров А.З., Рапопорт J1.M., Безруков Е.А., Бутнару Д.В. // Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2004. № 3. С. 61-64.

4. A systematic review of the role of imaging before salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence / Beresford M.J., Gillatt D., Benson R.J., Ajithkumar T. // Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.). 2010. Vol. 22, N 1. P. 46-55.

5. 11 C-acetate PET imaging of prostate cancer / Oyama N., Akino H., Kanamaru H., Suzuki Y., Muramoto S., Yonekura Y., Sadato N., Yamamoto K., Okada K. // J. Nucl. Med. 2002. Vol. 43, N 2. P. 181-186.

6. Dynamic contrastenhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization / Jackson A.S., Reinsberg S.A., Sohaib S.A., Charles-Edwards E.M., Jhavar S., Christmas T.J., Thompson A.C., Bailey M.J., Corbishley C.M., Fisher C., Leach M.O., Dearnaley D.P. // Br. J. Radiol. 2009. Vol. 82, N 974. P. 148- 156.

7. Elgamal A.A., Troychak M.J., Murphy G.P. ProstaScint scan may enhance identification of prostate cancer recurrences after prostatectomy, radiation, or hormone therapy: Analysis of 136 scans of 100 patients // Prostate. 1998. Vol. 37, N4. P. 261-269.

8. Endorectal MRI assessment of local relapse after surgery for prostate cancer: a model to define treatment field guidelines for adjuvant radiotherapy in patients at high risk for local failure / Miralbell R., Vees H., Lozano J., Khan H., Molla M., Hidalgo A., Linero D., Rouzaud M. // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007. Vol. 67, N 2. P. 356-361.

9. [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients / Cimitan M., Bortolus R., Morassut S., Canzonieri V., Garbeglio A., BaresicТ., Borsatti, Drigo A., Trovo M.G. // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2006. Vol. 33, N 12. P. 1387-1398.

10. 18F-choline and/or llCacetate positron emission tomography: detection of residual or progressive subclinical disease at very low prostatespecific antigen values (<1 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy / Vees H., Buchegger

11. Intraindividual comparison of [HC]acetate and [1 lCJcholine PET for detection of metastases of prostate cancer / Kotzerke J., Volkmer B.G., Glatting G., van den Hoff J., Gschwend J.E., Messer P., Reske S.N., Neumaier B. // Nuklearmedizin. 2003. Vol. 42, N 1. P. 25-30

12. Imaging procedures to diagnose prostate cancer / Seitz M., Scher A., Scherr M., Tilki D, Schlenker A., Gratzke C., Schipf A., Stanislaus P., Muller-Lisse U., Reich 0.,StiefC.//Urologe A. 2007. Vol. 46, N 10. P. 1435-1446.

13. Leventis А.Ё., Shariat S.F., Slawin K M. Local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: correlation of US features with prostatic fossa biopsy findings // Radiology. 2001. Vol. 219, N 2. P. 432-439.

14. Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy / Kane C.J., Amling C.L., Johnstone P.A., Dae N„ Lance R.S., Thrasher J.В., Foley J.P., Riffenburgh R.H., Moul J.W. // Urology. 2003. Vol. 61, N 3. P. 607-611.

15. Petronis J.D, Regan F, Lin K. Indium-Illcapromabpendetide (ProstaScint) imaging to detect recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer // Clin. Nucl. Med. 1998. Vol. 23, N10. P. 672-677.

16. Preliminary imaging results using In-Ill labeled CYT-356 (Prostascint) in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer / Sodee D.B., Conant R., Chalfant M., Miron S., Klein E., Bahnson R., Spirnak J.P., Carlin A., Bellon E.M., Rogers B. // Clin. Nucl. Med. 1996. Vol. 21, N 10. P. 759- 767.

17. Radioimmunoscintigraphy with lllindium labeled capromabpendetide predicts prostate cancer response to salvage radiotherapy after failed radical prostatectomy / Kahn D., Williams R.D., Haseman M.K., Reed N.L., Miller S.J., Gerstbrein J. // J. Clin. Oncol. 1998. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 284- 289.

18. Raj G.V., Partin A.W., Polascik T.J. Clinical utility of indium 111- capro-mabpendetideImmunoscintigraphy in the detection of early, recurrent prostate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy // Cancer. 2002. Vol. 94, N 4. P. 987-996

19. Reske S.N, Blumstein N.M, Glatting G. [(1 l)C]choline PET/CT imaging in occult local relapse of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2008. Vol. 35, N 1. P. 9-17.

20. Role of whole-body 18F-choline PET/CT in disease detection in patients with biochemical relapse after radical treatment for prostate cancer / Pelosi E., Arena V., Skanjeti A., Pirro V., Douroukas A., Pupi A., Mancini M. // Radiol. Med. 2008. Vol. 113, N 6. P. 895-904.

21. Rouviere O., Vitry Ò., Lyonnet D. Imaging of prostate cancer local recurrences: why and how? // Eur. Radiol. 2010. Vol. 20, N 5. P. 1254-1266.

22. Sensitivity of computed tomography in detecting local recurrence of prostatic carcinoma following radical prostatectomy / Kramer S, Gorich J, Gottfried H.W, Riska P, Aschoff A.J, Rilinger N„ Brambs H.J, Sokiranski R. // Br. J. Radiol. 1997. Vol. 70, N 838. P. 995-999.

23. Silverman JM, Krebs TL. MR imaging evaluation with a transrectal surface coil of local recurrence of prostatic cancer in men who have undergone radical prostatectomy // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1997. Vol. 168, N2.P. 379-385.

24. Suspected local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: endorectal coil MR imaging / Sella Ò., Schwartz L.H., Swindle P.W., Onyebuchi C.N., Scardino P.T., Scher H.I., Hricak H. // Radiology. 2004. Vol. 231, N 2. P. 379-385.

25. Stephenson A. J., Shariat S. F., Zelefsky M. J. et al. Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy // JAMA. — 2004. Vol. 291, № 11. — Р. 1325–1332.

26. Transrectal US in evaluation of patients after radical prostatectomy. Part I. Normal postoperative anatomy / Wasserman N.F, Kapoor D.A, Hildebrandt W.C, Zhang G, Born K.M, Eppel S.M, Reddy P.K. // Radiology. 1992. Vol. 185, N 2. P. 361-366. (4,5)

27. Yield of imaging and scintigraphy assessing biochemical failure in prostate cancer patients / Johnstone P.A., Tarman G.J., Riffenburgh R., Rohde D.C., Puckett M.L., Kane C.J. // Urol. Oncol. 1997. Vol. 3, N 4. P. 108-112.(15)


Review

For citations:


Bezrukov E.A., Lachinov E.L., Martirosyan G.A. DIAGNOSTIC CONSIDERATION OF RADIAL IMAGING METHODS IN IDENTIFYING LOCAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. Urology Herald. 2015;(3):68-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2015-0-3-68-78

Views: 2642


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2308-6424 (Online)