COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY OF URETERAL REIMPLANTATION AT VESICOURETERAL REFLUX AND URETEROVESICAL JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION USING VESICOSCOPIC APPROACH IN CHILDREN
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-4-47-57
Abstract
Rationale. Implementation of vesicoscopic (transvesical, pneumovesicoscopic) approach (VA) in the treatment of abnormalities and diseases of vesico-ureteral junction and a urinary bladder as alternative to the open surgery makes it relevant to study efficacy of such approach in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO).
Aim. To study efficacy of vesicoscopic reimplantation in vesicoureteral reflux and ureterovesical junction obstruction.
Materials and methods. From April, 2013 to July 2017 we carried out vesicoscopic surgery in 134 patients with VUR (177 ureters) and 24 patients with UVJO (25 ureters), 158 children at the age of 2 months-18 years in total. To determine indications to the surgery USI, excretory urography, retrograde voiding cystourethrography were used.
Results. Average duration of the surgery with use of VA in all patients was 128.6±50.0 min, in patients with VUR - 121.6±44.1 min, that slightly less than in children with UVJO – 168.9±62.4 min. Duration of postoperative period was 6.3±2.4 days, in the VUR group – 5.9±2.1 days, in the UVJO group – 8.1±3.1days. In patients with VUR reflux was repaired in 131 patients (97.7 %), in the UVJO group obstruction was eliminated in 23 patients (95.8%). Postoperative complications developed in 25 cases (15.8%) and assessed according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Relapses developed in 3 patients from the VUR group and in 1 patient from the UVJO group. We had to use conversion in 3 (1.8%) cases: once in the UVJO group (4.1%) and twice - in the VUR group (1.5%).
Conclusions. In the VUR group the percent of complications was significantly lower than in the UVJO group, that may be due to older age of the patients with reflux and as a result due to large bladder volume and space for surgeon manipulation. Total efficacy of the procedure is comparable to the results of the open surgery in both groups. But the percent of complications remains enough high, especially in the group with obstruction in the area of UVJ, that may be due to younger age of the patients in such category and, as a result, due to lesser bladder volume.
About the Authors
A. V. PirogovRussian Federation
chef of urological department,
V. V. Sizonov
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. Med., Professor at the Department of Urology and Human Reproductive Health with Pediatric Urology and Andrology Course;
chef of urological department, Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital,
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Okamura K, Ono Y, Yamada Y, Kato T, Tsuji Y, Ohshima S, Miyake K. Endoscopic trigonoplasty for primary vesicoureteric refl ux. Br J Urol. 1995;75(3):390-4.
2. Gill IS, Ponsky LE, Desai M, Kay R, Ross JH. Laparoscopic cross-trigonal Cohen ureteroneocystostomy: novel technique. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1811-4.
3. Yeung CK, Sihoe JD, Borzi PA. Endoscopic cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantaTIon under carbon dioxide bladder insuffl aTIon: a novel technique. J Endourol. 2005;19(3):295- 9. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.295
4. KuTIkov A, Guzzo TJ, Canter DJ, Casale P. IniTIal experience with laparoscopic transvesical ureteral reimplantaTIon at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. J Urol. 2006;176(5):2222-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.082
5. Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR, Patel AS. Vesicoscopic crosstrigonal ureteral reimplantaTIon: a minimally invasive opTIon for repair of vesicoureteral refl ux. J Urol. 2007;178(1):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.059
6. Jayanthi V, Patel A. Vesicoscopic ureteral reimplantaTIon: a minimally invasive technique for the defi niTIve repair of vesicoureteral refl ux. Adv Urol. 2008:973616. doi: 10.1155/2008/973616
7. Valla JS, Steyaert H, Griffi n SJ, Lauron J, Fragoso AC, Arnaud P, Léculée R. Transvesicoscopic Cohen ureteric reimplantaTIon for vesicoureteral refl ux in children: a single-centre 5-year experience. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5(6):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.03.012
8. Hong CH, Kim JH, Jung HJ, Im YJ, Han SW. Single-surgeon experience with transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantaTIon in children with vesicoureteral refl ux. Urology. 2011;77(6):1465-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.023
9. Chung MS, Han SW, Jung HJ, Im YJ, Han HH, Na JC, Hong CH. Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantaTIon in children with bilateral vesicoureteral refl ux: surgical technique and results. J LaparoendoscAdvSurgTech A. 2012;22(3):295-300. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0318
10. Emir H, Mammadov E, Elicevik M, Buyukunal C, Soylet Y. Transvesicoscopic cross-trigonal ureteroneocystostomy in children: a single-center experience. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8(1):83-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.10.005
11. Roslan M, Markuszewski MM, Kłącz J, Krajka K. Laparoendoscopic single-site transvesicalureteroneocystostomy for vesicoureteral refl ux in an adult: a one-year follow-up. Urology. 2012;80(3):719-23. doi: 10.1016/j. urology.2012.06.028
12. Bi Y, Sun Y. Laparoscopic pneumovesical ureteral tapering and reimplantaTIonfor megaureter. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(12):2285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.09.020
13. Shmyrov OS, Vrublevsky SG, Vrublevskaya EN, VrublevskyAS. EndosurgicalintervenTIons for correcTIon of pathological vesicoureteral segment in children. Detskaja hirurgija. 2014;4:25-28. (in Russ.).
14. Schober MS, Jayanthi VR. Vesicoscopic ureteral reimplant: is there a role in the age of roboTIcs? UrolClinNorthAm. 2015;42(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.09.005
15. Soh S, Kobori Y, Shin T, Suzuki K, Iwahata T, Sadaoka Y, Sato R, Nishi M, Iwamura M, Okada H. Transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantaTIon: Politano-LeadbeƩ er versus Cohen technique. Int J Urol. 2015;22(4):394-9. doi: 10.1111/iju.12702
16. Choi H, Park JY, Bae JH. IniTIal experiences of laparoscopic intravesicaldetrusorraphy using the Politano-LeadbeƩ er technique. J PediatrUrol. 2016;12(2):110.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.07.014
17. Ansari MS, Yadav P, Arora S, Singh P, Sekhon V. Bilateral Transvesicoscopic Cross-trigonal Ureteric ReimplantaTIon in Children: Surgical SubtleTIes and a ProspecTIve Summary. Urology. 2017;101:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.11.034
18. Kim SW, Lim NL, Lee YS, Han SW, Im YJ. Laparoscopic Intravesical Detrusorrhaphy With Ureteral PlicaTIon for Megaureter: A Novel Technique. Urology. 2015;86(1):187-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.023
19. Liu X, Liu JH, Zhang DY, Hua Y, Lin T, Wei GH, He DW. Retrospective study to determine the short-term outcomes of a modified pneumovesical Glenn-Anderson procedure for treating primary obstructing megaureter. J PediatrUrol. 2015;11(5):266.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j. jpurol.2015.03.020
20. Naitoh Y, Oishi M, Kobayashi K, Yamada Y, Nakamura T, Johnin K, Hongo F, Naya Y, Okihara K, Kawauchi A. Transvesical laparoscopic surgery for double renal pelvis and ureter with or without ureterocele. Int J Urol. 2016;23(4):332-6. doi: 10.1111/iju.13049
21. Marte A, Cavaiuolo S, Esposito M, Pintozzi L. Vesicoscopic Treatment of Symptomatic Congenital Bladder Diverticula in Children: A 7-Year Experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016;26(3):240-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1551564
22. Duckett JW, Walker RD, Weiss R. Surgical results: International Reflux Study in Children--United States branch. J Urol. 1992;148:1674-5.
23. Hjälmås K, Löhr G, Tamminen-Möbius T, Seppänen J, Olbing H, Wikström S. Surgical results in the International Reflux Study in Children (Europe). J Urol. 1992;148:1657- 61.
24. Elder JS, Diaz M, Caldamone AA, Cendron M, Greenfi eld S, Hurwitz R, Kirsch A, Koyle MA, Pope J, Shapiro E. Endoscopic therapy for vesicoureteral refl ux: ametaanalysis. I. Refl ux resoluTIon and urinary tract infecTIon. J Urol. 2006;175(2):716-22. doi: 10.1016/S0022- 5347(05)00210-7
Review
For citations:
Pirogov A.V., Sizonov V.V. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY OF URETERAL REIMPLANTATION AT VESICOURETERAL REFLUX AND URETEROVESICAL JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION USING VESICOSCOPIC APPROACH IN CHILDREN. Urology Herald. 2017;5(4):47-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-4-47-57