<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">urovest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Urology Herald</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник урологии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2308-6424</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Rostov State Medical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-1-19-26</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">urovest-826</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>PSA density as a predictor of long-term infectious complications during transurethral resection of the prostate: determining an optimal cut-off value</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Плотность ПСА как предиктор отдалённых инфекционных  осложнений при трансуретральной резекции простаты: определение оптимального порогового значения  показателя</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9772-937X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Иванов</surname><given-names>С. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ivanov</surname><given-names>S. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сергей Никитич Иванов — аспирант кафедры урологии и репродуктивного здоровья человека (с курсом детской урологии-андрологии)</p><p> Ростов-на-Дону</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Sergey N. Ivanov — M.D.; Postgrad. Student, Dept. of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Reproductive Health</p><p>Rostov-on-Don</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">ivanovsergey19@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1710-0169</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коган</surname><given-names>М. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kogan</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Михаил Иосифович Коган — д-р мед. наук, профессор, заслуженный деятель науки РФ; заведующий кафедрой урологии и репродуктивного здоровья человека (с курсом детской урологии-андрологии)</p><p> Ростов-на-Дону</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mikhail I. Kogan — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof., Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation; Head, Dept. of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Reproductive Health</p><p>Rostov-on-Don</p><p>   </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">dept_kogan@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4808-7024</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Набока</surname><given-names>Ю. Л.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Naboka</surname><given-names>Yu. L. </given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> Юлия Лазаревна Набока — д-р мед. наук, профессор; заведующая кафедрой микробиологии и вирусологии №1</p><p>Ростов-на-Дону</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Yulia L. Naboka — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof.; Head, Dept. of Microbiology and Virology No.1</p><p>Rostov-on-Don</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">nagu22@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8335-2578</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Медведев</surname><given-names>В. Л.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Medvedev</surname><given-names>V. L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Владимир Леонидович Медведев — д-р. мед. наук, профессор; заведующий кафедрой урологии; заместитель главного врача по урологии, руководитель уронефрологического центра</p><p>Краснодар</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Vladimir L. Medvedev — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof.; Head, Dept. of Urology; Deputy CMO for Urology &amp; Head, Urology and Nephrology Centre</p><p>Krasnodar</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">medvedev_vl@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-8766</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Палагута</surname><given-names>Г. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Palaguta</surname><given-names>G. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Георгий Александрович Палагута — ассистент кафедры урологии ФГБОУ ВО КубГМУ Минздрава России; врач-уролог урологического отделения № 1</p><p>Краснодар</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Georgy A. Palaguta — M.D.; Assist.Prof., Dept. of Urology, Kuban State Medical University; Urologist, Urology Division No.1</p><p>Krasnodar</p><p>   </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">palaguta83@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Ростовский государственный медицинский университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Rostov State Medical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Кубанский государственный медицинский университет; Научно-исследовательский институт – Краевая клиническая больница №1 им. проф. С. В. Очаповского</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kuban State Medical University; Research Institute – Prof. Ochapovsky Regional Hospital No. 1</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>19</fpage><lpage>26</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Ivanov S.N., Kogan M.I., Naboka Y.L., Medvedev V.L., Palaguta G.A., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Иванов С.Н., Коган М.И., Набока Ю.Л., Медведев В.Л., Палагута Г.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Ivanov S.N., Kogan M.I., Naboka Y.L., Medvedev V.L., Palaguta G.A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/826">https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/826</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. Infectious complications (ICs) after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are significant and potentially life-threatening conditions with an incidence 0.5% – 20.0%. Most publications provide data regarding early infectious complications. At the same time, there are currently no studies aimed at a comprehensive assessment of long-term infectious complications after TURP. The problem of prevention and treatment of ICs is also accompanied by insufficient understanding of the role of undiagnosed inflammation in prostate tissues and the lack of representative laboratory markers.</p></sec><sec><title>Objective</title><p>Objective. To assess the prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) as a predictor of long-term infectious complications after transurethral resection of the prostate and to determine the optimal cut-off value.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials &amp; methods</title><p>Materials &amp; methods. This single-center study included 162 patients who underwent mono- and bipolar TURP between 2016 – 2023. Inclusion criteria for the study: prostate volume 30–80 cm3, no history of urinary tract infections (UTIs) at the time of hospitalization and antibiotic treatment at least one month before surgery, possible presence of latent UTIs before surgery, no prostate cancer. Exclusion criteria were failure to meet inclusion criteria. Infectious complications assessed included upper and lower UTIs, as well as epididymitis, orchitis and prostatitis, confirmed by clinical and laboratory data. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assessment was performed &lt; 2 days before surgery.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The median PSAd value was 0.04 [0.03; 0.08] ng/ml2, the variable was significantly different in non-infection and infection groups (0.04 and 0.08 ng/ml2, respectively, p = 0.009). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.67 (95% CI [0.546 – 0.791]). The optimal cut-off value of the PSAd in prediction of long-term ICs was &gt; 0.07 ng/ml2, sensitivity / specificity: 58.3% and 76.1%, respectively. The analysis showed more than 4 times higher odds of developing an infectious complication in PSAd &gt; 0.07 ng/ml2 patients: OR 4.3 (95% CI [1.7 – 10.5], p = 0.001).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. This study demonstrates data that defines a new clinical non-oncological significance of PSAd as a predictor of the development of long-term infectious complications after TURP.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Инфекционные осложнения (ИО) являются значимым, потенциально жизнеугрожающим состоянием, развивающимся при трансуретральной резекции предстательной железы (ТУРП) с частотой от 0,5% до 20,0% случаев. Большая часть исследований предоставляют данные в отношении непосредственных и ближайших ИО. При этом в текущее время в литературе отсутствуют работы, всесторонне освещающие отдалённые ИО после ТУРП. Проблема профилактики и лечения ИО осложняется также недостаточным пониманием роли не диагностированного воспаления в тканях предстательной железы и отсутствием репрезентативных лабораторных маркёров.</p></sec><sec><title>Цель исследования</title><p>Цель исследования. Оценка плотности простатспецифического антигена (PSAd) как предиктора отдалённых инфекционных осложнений после трансуретральной резекции простаты.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. В настоящее многоцентровое исследование включены 162 пациента, которым за период с 2016 по 2023 годы были выполнены моно- и биполярная ТУРП. Критерии включения в исследование: объём предстательной железы 30 – 80 см3, отсутствие в анамнезе инфекций мочевых путей (ИМП) на момент госпитализации и лечения антибактериальными препаратами как минимум за 1 месяц до операции, возможное наличие латентных ИМП перед операцией, отсутствие рака предстательной железы. Критерием исключения служило несоответствие критериям включения. Оцениваемые инфекционные осложнения включали инфекции верхних и нижних мочевых путей, а также эпидидимит, орхит и простатит, подтверждённые на основании клинико-лабораторных данных. Оценка простатспецифического антигена (ПСА) происходила не ранее 2 суток перед операцией.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Медиана показателя PSAd составила 0,04 [0,03; 0,08] нг/мл2, показатель значимо различался в группах без ИО и с ИО (0,04 и 0,08 нг/мл2 соответственно, р = 0,009). Площадь под кривой (AUC) составила 0,67 (95% ДИ [0,546 – 0,791]). Определено оптимальное пороговое значение (cut-off) показателя PSAd как предиктора отдалённых ИО: PSAd &gt; 0,07 нг/мл2, чувствительность / специфичность — 58,3% и 76,1% соответственно. Анализ показал более чем четырёхкратное повышение шансов развития инфекционного осложнения при PSAd &gt; 0,07 нг/мл2: отношение шансов — 4,3 (95% ДИ [1,7 – 10,5], р = 0,001).</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Исследование демонстрирует результаты, определяющие новую клиническую неонкологическую значимость показателя плотности ПСА как предиктора развития отдалённых инфекционных осложнений после трансуретральной резекции предстательной железы.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>доброкачественная гиперплазия предстательной железы</kwd><kwd>ДГПЖ</kwd><kwd>трансуретральная резекция предстательной железы</kwd><kwd>ТУРП</kwd><kwd>инфекционные осложнения</kwd><kwd>инфекции мочевых путей</kwd><kwd>ИМП</kwd><kwd>плотность простатспецифического антигена</kwd><kwd>ПСА</kwd><kwd>пиелонефрит</kwd><kwd>эпидидимоорхит</kwd><kwd>простатит</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>benign prostatic hyperplasia</kwd><kwd>BPH</kwd><kwd>transurethral resection of the prostate gland</kwd><kwd>TURP</kwd><kwd>infectious complications</kwd><kwd>urinary tract infections</kwd><kwd>UTI</kwd><kwd>prostate-specific antigen density</kwd><kwd>PSA</kwd><kwd>pyelonephritis</kwd><kwd>epididymo-orchitis</kwd><kwd>prostatitis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is one of the most common surgical procedures in urology and is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit2">2</xref>]. Infectious complications (ICs) are the most dangerous limitations of endourological prostate surgery. ICs are potentially life-threatening difficult to control conditions and one of the leading causes of sepsis. The incidence of infectious complications during transurethral prostate surgery ranges from 0,5 to 20,0% [2-5]. Most studies provide data regarding immediate and short-term infectious complications. At the same time, there are currently no publications providing comprehensive assessment of long-term infectious complications after TURP. The problem of prevention and treatment of ICs is also complicated by insufficient understanding of the role of undetected inflammation in prostate tissues and the lack of representative laboratory markers.</p><p>Objective. To assess the prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) as a predictor of long-term infectious complications after transurethral resection of the prostate.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>This single-center study included 162 patients who underwent mono- and bipolar TURP between 2016 and 2023 with monopolar 24 Fr and bipolar 24 Fr resectoscopes Karl Storz («Karl Storz SE GmbH &amp; Co. KG», Tuttlingen, Germany). Inclusion criteria for the study: prostate volume 30 – 80 cm3, no history of symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) at the time of hospitalization and treatment with antibacterial drugs at least one month before surgery, possible presence of latent UTIs, absence of prostate cancer. The exclusion criterion was failure to meet the inclusion criteria.</p><p>Preoperative examination of patients was carried out in accordance with clinical guidelines. Prostate volume was assessed using transrectal ultrasound (ml), device — RS80A (Samsung, South Korea), probe — CA2-9A (2 – 9 MHz). Total blood PSA was assessed no more than two days before surgery. PSA density (ng/ml2) was determined using the formula = PSA (ng/ml) / prostate volume (ml). All patients with a total blood PSA level &gt; 4 ng/ml, as well as having digital rectal examination or magnetic resonance imaging (magnetic resonance imaging scanner GE Discovery MR750w 3.0T, General Electric, USA) underwent prostate biopsy at least three months before proposed transurethral prostate surgery in in the presence of indications: a total blood PSA value &gt; 4 ng/ml, digital rectal examination, and magnetic resonance imaging data suspicious for prostate cancer. The number of daytime and nighttime voids was assessed by completing a voiding diary for 7 days. The development of long-term ICs was defined as clinical and laboratory signs of upper and lower urinary tract infections or in presence of confirmed episodes of epididymitis, orchitis and prostatitis.</p><p>Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out in the statistical data processing environment IBMÒ SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 («SPSS: An IBM Company», IBM SPSS Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Kolomgorov-Smirnov-Lilliefors test was used to test the distribution normality and the equality of variance was also assessed. Descriptive statistics for quantitative variables are presented for normal distribution as the mean (M) and standard deviation (±SD) and for non-normal distribution as the median (Me) and interquartile range [Q1; Q3]. To compare quantitative variables with normal and non-normal distribution, Student t-test + Levene test and Mann-Whitney U test were used respectively. Frequencies were compared using Pearson’s chi-square with Yates's correction. For correlation analysis, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictive power of the variable. Nagelkerke R2 was used to calculate the proportion of variance in clinical outcomes that could be explained by the predictors. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and the corresponding area under the ROC–AUC curve were used to assess the quality of the model. A sample size of 162 patients is enough to achieve an effect size of 80% for logistic regression.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>1) Analysis of demographic details and baseline perioperative data. </p><p>Baseline characteristics and a comparative analysis of groups with and without ICs are presented in Table 1. The median follow-up was 4 [ 1.2; 5.4] years. ICs were developed in 24 (14.8%) patients during follow-up: urethritis developed in three cases, epididymo-orchitis in nine cases, acute prostatitis in one case, and cystitis in 11 cases. Age, BMI, prostate volume, daytime and nighttime urination frequency before surgery and the incidence of early postoperative ICs during hospitalization were comparable in groups. The groups had statistically significant differences in baseline total blood PSA and PSA density.</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><caption><p>Table 1. Demographic details and baseline</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Variables</td><td>Total
(n = 162)</td><td>Non-infection
(n = 138)</td><td>Infection
(n = 24)</td><td>р</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Age, M ± SD years</td><td>67.5 ± 7.1</td><td>67.5 ± 6.9</td><td>67.1 ± 7.9</td><td>0.775</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>BMI, M ± SD kg/m2</td><td>28.5 ± 4.2</td><td>28,5 ± 4.2</td><td>28.4 ± 4.2</td><td>0,907</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Diabetes, n (%)</td><td>28 (17.3)</td><td>26 (18.8)</td><td>2 (8.3)</td><td>0.335</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Suprapubic drainage, n (%)</td><td>39 (24.1)</td><td>31 (22.5)</td><td>8 (33,3)</td><td>0.373</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Prostate volume, M ± SD ml</td><td>71.0 ± 23.5</td><td>71.3 ± 23,6</td><td>69.2 ± 23.1</td><td>0.689</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Total PSA, Me [Q1; Q3] ng/ml</td><td>3.2 [ 1.8; 6.4]</td><td>3.1 [ 1.8; 5.2]</td><td>4,4 [ 2.7; 10.8]</td><td>0.043*</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>PSAd, Me [Q1; Q3] ng/ml2</td><td>0.04 [ 0.03; 0.08]</td><td>0.04 [ 0.03; 0.07]</td><td>0.08 [ 0.04; 0.11]</td><td>0.009*</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Day urination, M ± SD</td><td>6.4 ± 1.3</td><td>6.3 ± 1.3</td><td>6.5 ± 1.2</td><td>0.531</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Night urination, M ± SD</td><td>4.6 ± 2.3</td><td>4.5 ± 2.3</td><td>5.0 ± 2.3</td><td>0.335</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Early IC, n (%)</td><td>19 (11.7)</td><td>16 (11.6)</td><td>3 (12.5)</td><td>1.000</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Long-term IC, n (%)</td><td>24 (14.8)</td><td>0 (0.0)</td><td>24 (100.0)</td><td>–</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Notes.
1)     * differences are significant at p &lt; 0.05; Student's t test + Levene's test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare quantitative variables for data with and without normal distribution, respectively; frequencies were compared using Pearson's chi-square + Yates's correction
2)      PSA — prostate-specific antigen; PSAd — PSA density; BMI — body mass index; IC — infectious complications; M ± SD — mean ± standard deviation; Me [Q1; Q3] — median &amp; interquartile range</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Table 2 presents the correlations between baseline total PSA and PSA density values and the incidence of long-term ICs.</p><table-wrap id="table-2"><caption><p>Table 2. PSA and PSA density correlations with the incidence of infectious complications</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Variables</td><td>Long-term IC</td></tr><tr><td>r</td><td>p</td></tr><tr><td>Total PSA, ng/ml</td><td>159</td><td>0.043</td></tr><tr><td>PSA density, ng/ml2</td><td>207</td><td>0.008</td></tr><tr><td>Notes.
1) r — Spearman correlation coefficient, statistically significant at p &lt; 0.05
2) IC — infectious complications; PSA — prostate-specific antigen</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Figure 1 shows the distribution of PSA density by occurrence frequency (%). About 85.2% of values did not reach 0.10 ng/ml2, 10.5% of values were in the range of 0.10 – 0.20 ng/ml2, 1.9% were in the range of 0.20 – 0.25 ng/ml2, 2.5% – represented by values of 0.35 – 0.50 ng/ml2.</p><fig id="fig-1"><caption><p>Figure 1. Frequency distribution of PSA density (PSAd) values</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="urovest-12-1-g001.png"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/urovest/2024/1/3VJuHot0AEI8V1Us3oQAarIIbUSkcjH0pzQpn9yv.png</uri></graphic></fig><p>2) ROC analysis of the prognostic value of PSA density as a predictor of long-term infectious complications.</p><p>The median PSA density was 0.04 [ 0.03; 0.08] ng/ml2. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.67, standard deviation 0.062 (95% CI [ 0.546 – 0.791]) (Fig. 2).</p><fig id="fig-2"><caption><p>Figure 2. ROC curve of PSA density for the outcome: long-term infectious complications. ROC — Receiver Operating Characteristic</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="urovest-12-1-g002.png"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/urovest/2024/1/v1ZCi9Iz7T4FZgnDZXidPiJH48r7KS2ZRqEvyvHZ.png</uri></graphic></fig><p>3) Optimal cut-off value of the PSA density for predicting distant infectious complications.</p><p>From a sequential series of PSAd values [min: 0.0049 ng/ml2; max: 5.058 ng/ml2] the range with the optimal ratio of sensitivity (54.2% – 58.3%) and specificity (73.9% – 77.5%) was determined: from 0.06 ng/ml2 to 0.08 ng /ml2 (in Fig. 3 the range is limited by the red dotted lines). The cut-off value PSAd is located at the intersection of the green dashed lines.</p><fig id="fig-3"><caption><p>Figure 3. PSAd cut-off value on the ROC curve for the outcome: long-term infectious complications. (PSAd — prostate-specific antigen density; red dotted lines limit the optimal range of sensitivity and specificity; PSAd cut-off value is at the intersection of the green dashed lines. ROC — Receiver Operating Characteristic)</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="urovest-12-1-g003.png"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/urovest/2024/1/mRBoHcc7hgsK1IfUi5O6K7z2zAhfSUoCLlKTwyMk.png</uri></graphic></fig><p>Table 3 presents the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, coefficients of determination (Nagelkerke R2), and predictor significance (p) at different cut-off levels. The optimal ratio of sensitivity / specificity, positive / negative predictive value, as well as the highest percentage of explained variation in outcome (long-term ICs) was determined for a PSAd cut-off value &gt; 0.07 ng/ml2.</p><table-wrap id="table-3"><caption><p>Table 3. Predictive accuracy of different PSA density cut-off values for assessing the risk of long-term infectious complications</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>PSAd cut-off value, ng/ml2</td><td>Sensitivity, (%)</td><td>Specificity, (%)</td><td>PPV, (%)</td><td>NPV, (%)</td><td>LR+, (%)</td><td>LR–, (%)</td><td>R2</td><td>p</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 0.06</td><td>58.3</td><td>73.9</td><td>90.6</td><td>25.0</td><td>2.23</td><td>56.5</td><td>0.071</td><td>0.010*</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 0.07</td><td>58.3</td><td>76.1</td><td>91.2</td><td>29.2</td><td>2.43</td><td>58.2</td><td>0.107</td><td>0.002*</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 0.08</td><td>54.2</td><td>77.5</td><td>90.9</td><td>29.3</td><td>2.40</td><td>59.0</td><td>0.086</td><td>0.004*</td></tr><tr><td>Note. PSAd — prostate-specific antigen density; PPV / NPV — positive / negative predictive value; LR+ / LR- — positive/negative likelihood ratio; * statistically significant at p &lt; 0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>4) Goodness-of-fit analysis for univariate models predicting long-term infectious complication from PSAd values.</p><p>ROC curves of predicted and observed IC outcomes were constructed for three cut-off values including the optimal PSAd &gt; 0.07 ng/ml2 to perform a goodness-of-fit analysis of the univariate model. Models’ characteristics are presented in Table 4. The analysis confirmed the highest predictive value of the optimal cut-off value PSAd &gt; 0.07 ng/ml2, AUC = 0.67; 95% CI [ 0.55 – 0.79].</p><table-wrap id="table-4"><caption><p>Table 4. Goodness-of-fit test for univariate models predicting long-term infectious complications from PSAd values</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>PSAd cut-off value</td><td>AUC</td><td>CI lower limit</td><td>CI upper limit</td><td>p</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 0.06</td><td>0.639</td><td>0.516</td><td>0.763</td><td>0.029*</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 0.07</td><td>0.668</td><td>0.545</td><td>0.792</td><td>0.009*</td></tr><tr><td>&gt; 0.08</td><td>0.645</td><td>0.517</td><td>0.773</td><td>0.024*</td></tr><tr><td>Note. PSAd — prostate-specific antigen density; AUC — area under the curve; CI — confidence interval; *statistically significant at p &lt; 0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p> 5) Assessment of the relationship between long-term ICs and PSA density.</p><p>To assess the relationship the odds ratio (OR) was calculated for a cut-off value of PSAd &gt; 0.07 ng/ml2. The analysis showed a more than 4 times increase in the odds of developing an infectious complication with an increase in PSAd &gt; 0.07 ng/ml2: OR = 4.3, 95% CI [ 1.7 – 10.5], p = 0.001.</p></sec><sec><title>Discussion</title><p>Most studies do not discuss PSA level as a risk factor for the development of infectious complications after TURP [6-11]. According to recent studies about 10.0 – 12.0% of the results of PSA assessment as part of cancer screening are false positive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit12">12</xref>]. Discussion of the high rate of false-positive results in total PSA screening tests primarily focuses on overdiagnosis, over-prescription of biopsies, and biopsy-associated complications. From our point of view, it is important to focus attention on the causes of non-cancer-related PSA variability and false-positive results of PSA screening. PSA is nonspecific for assessing the oncological process and is reactive in inflammatory processes in the prostate. It is noted that febrile UTIs in men may be accompanied by an increase in serum PSA values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit13">13</xref>]. In a 2023 meta-analysis based on pooled data from three studies (290 patients) our scientific group confirmed that the average preoperative PSA values is significantly higher in patients with postoperative bacteriuria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit14">14</xref>]. The present investigation continued the research trend on the PSA role in the issue of infectious status of patients undergoing TURP and confirmed the association between PSA values and long-term ICs.</p><p>It is known that PSA values associated with the prostate volume [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit15">15</xref>]. In current study, it was decided to assess PSAd to increase PSA representativeness as a marker of prostate inflammatory status. The results of the analysis showed a more significant relationship between the PSAd and long-term ICs compared with the total blood PSA. These findings allow us to propose the use of this biomarker as an important predictor of ICs. Our results demonstrate the potential role of PSAd as a marker of undetected inflammatory processes in the prostate. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the non-cancer prognostic PSAd values in determining the risk of long-term infectious complications after TURP.</p><p>Study limitations included the small sample size, single-centre, and retrospective study design.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>This study demonstrates data that defines a new clinical non-oncological significance of PSAd as a predictor of the development of long-term infectious complications after transurethral resection of the prostate. The results of this study suggest further research into the structure of significant predictors of infectious complications in the early and long-term postoperative periods and the development of multivariate prognostic models.</p><p>Key points:</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jo JK, Shinn SH, Kim KS, Moon HS. Changes in Prevalence and Treatment Pattern of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Korea. Int Neurourol J. 2021;25(4):347-354. DOI: 10.5213/inj.2040412.206</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jo JK, Shinn SH, Kim KS, Moon HS. Changes in Prevalence and Treatment Pattern of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Korea. Int Neurourol J. 2021;25(4):347-354. DOI: 10.5213/inj.2040412.206</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lin YH, Hou CP, Chen TH, Juang HH, Chang PL, Yang PS, Chen CL, Tsui KH. Transurethral resection of the prostate provides more favorable clinical outcomes compared with conservative medical treatment in patients with urinary retention caused by benign prostatic obstruction. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):15. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0709-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lin YH, Hou CP, Chen TH, Juang HH, Chang PL, Yang PS, Chen CL, Tsui KH. Transurethral resection of the prostate provides more favorable clinical outcomes compared with conservative medical treatment in patients with urinary retention caused by benign prostatic obstruction. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):15. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0709-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vivien A, Lazard T, Rauss A, Laisné MJ, Bonnet F. Infection after transurethral resection of the prostate: variation among centers and correlation with a long-lasting surgical procedure. Association pour la Recherche en AnesthésieRéanimation. Eur Urol. 1998;33(4):365-369. DOI: 10.1159/000019617</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vivien A, Lazard T, Rauss A, Laisné MJ, Bonnet F. Infection after transurethral resection of the prostate: variation among centers and correlation with a long-lasting surgical procedure. Association pour la Recherche en AnesthésieRéanimation. Eur Urol. 1998;33(4):365-369. DOI: 10.1159/000019617</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guo RQ, Yu W, Meng YS, Zhang K, Xu B, Xiao YX, Wu SL, Pan BN. Correlation of benign prostatic obstruction-related complications with clinical outcomes in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017;33(3):144-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.01.002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guo RQ, Yu W, Meng YS, Zhang K, Xu B, Xiao YX, Wu SL, Pan BN. Correlation of benign prostatic obstruction-related complications with clinical outcomes in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017;33(3):144-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.01.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mayer EK, Kroeze SG, Chopra S, Bottle A, Patel A. Examining the 'gold standard': a comparative critical analysis of three consecutive decades of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) outcomes. BJU Int. 2012;110(11):1595-1601. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11119.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mayer EK, Kroeze SG, Chopra S, Bottle A, Patel A. Examining the 'gold standard': a comparative critical analysis of three consecutive decades of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) outcomes. BJU Int. 2012;110(11):1595-1601. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11119.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Osman T, ElSaeed KO, Youssef HA, Shabayek M, Emam A, Hussein MS. Evaluation of the risk factors associated with the development of post-transurethral resection of the prostate persistent bacteriuria. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(3):260-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.05.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Osman T, ElSaeed KO, Youssef HA, Shabayek M, Emam A, Hussein MS. Evaluation of the risk factors associated with the development of post-transurethral resection of the prostate persistent bacteriuria. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(3):260-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.05.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">El Basri A, Petrolekas A, Cariou G, Doublet JD, Hoznek A, Bruyere F. Clinical significance of routine urinary bacterial culture after transurethral surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Urology. 2012;79(3):564-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.018</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">El Basri A, Petrolekas A, Cariou G, Doublet JD, Hoznek A, Bruyere F. Clinical significance of routine urinary bacterial culture after transurethral surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Urology. 2012;79(3):564-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.018</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Girou E, Rioux C, Brun-Buisson C, Lobel B; Infection Committee of the French Association of Urology. The postoperative bacteriuria score: a new way to predict nosocomial infection after prostate surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(8):847-854. DOI: 10.1086/506398</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Girou E, Rioux C, Brun-Buisson C, Lobel B; Infection Committee of the French Association of Urology. The postoperative bacteriuria score: a new way to predict nosocomial infection after prostate surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(8):847-854. DOI: 10.1086/506398</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wagenlehner FM, Wagenlehner C, Schinzel S, Naber KG; Working Group "Urological Infections" of German Society of Urology. Prospective, randomized, multicentric, open, comparative study on the efficacy of a prophylactic single dose of 500 mg levofloxacin versus 1920 mg trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole versus a control group in patients undergoing TUR of the prostate. Eur Urol. 2005;47(4):549-556. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.01.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wagenlehner FM, Wagenlehner C, Schinzel S, Naber KG; Working Group "Urological Infections" of German Society of Urology. Prospective, randomized, multicentric, open, comparative study on the efficacy of a prophylactic single dose of 500 mg levofloxacin versus 1920 mg trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole versus a control group in patients undergoing TUR of the prostate. Eur Urol. 2005;47(4):549-556. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.01.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коган М.И., Набока Ю.Л., Иванов С.Н. Факторы риска, антибиотикопрофилактика и лечение инфекции мочевых путей при трансуретральной хирургии гиперплазии простаты. Вестник урологии. 2022;10(2):99-108. DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-2-99-108</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kogan M.I., Naboka Yu.L., Ivanov S.N. Risk factors, antibiotic prophylaxis, and treatment of urinary tract infection in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology Herald. 2022;10(2):99-108. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-2-99-108</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коган М.И., Набока Ю.Л., Иванов С.Н. Оценка инфекционного фактора при трансуретральной хирургии гиперплазии простаты. Вестник урологии. 2021;9(3):79-91. DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-3-79-91</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kogan M.I., Naboka Yu.L., Ivanov S.N. Assessment of the infectious factor in transurethral surgery of benign prostate hyperplasia. Urology Herald. 2021;9(3):79-91. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fenton JJ, Weyrich MS, Durbin S, Liu Y, Bang H, Melnikow J. Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. USA, Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fenton JJ, Weyrich MS, Durbin S, Liu Y, Bang H, Melnikow J. Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. USA, Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arjunlal TS, Deepanjali S, Manikandan R, Medha R. Frequency and clinical significance of prostatic involvement in men with febrile urinary tract infection: a prospective observational study. F1000Res. 2020;9:617. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.24094.3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arjunlal TS, Deepanjali S, Manikandan R, Medha R. Frequency and clinical significance of prostatic involvement in men with febrile urinary tract infection: a prospective observational study. F1000Res. 2020;9:617. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.24094.3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванов С.Н., Коган М.И., Набока Ю.Л., Медведев В.Л. Инфекционный фактор при трансуретральной хирургии доброкачественной гиперплазии простаты: систематический обзор и мета-анализ. Урология. 2023;(4):141-149. DOI: 10.18565/urology.2023.4.141-149</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanov S.N., Kogan M.I., Naboka Y.L., Medvedev V.L. Infectious factor in transuretral surgery of benign prostate hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urologiia. 2023;(4):141-149. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18565/urology.2023.4.141-149</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coric J, Mujic J, Kucukalic E, Ler D. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and Prostate Volume: Better Predictor of Prostate Cancer for Bosnian and Herzegovina Men. Open Biochem J. 2015;9:34-36. DOI: 10.2174/1874091X01509010034</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coric J, Mujic J, Kucukalic E, Ler D. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and Prostate Volume: Better Predictor of Prostate Cancer for Bosnian and Herzegovina Men. Open Biochem J. 2015;9:34-36. DOI: 10.2174/1874091X01509010034</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
