References

urovest

Вестник урологии

Urology Herald

2308-6424

Rostov State Medical University

10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-2-154-163

urovest-730

Research Article

ОБЗОРЫ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

REVIEWS ARTICLE

Современный взгляд на оперативные методы лечения нефролитиаза

The modern view on the surgical treatment of nephrolithiasis

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8335-030X

Роюк

Р. В.

Royuk

R. V.

Руслан Валерьевич Роюк — кандидат медицинских наук; начальник урологического отделения филиала №1.

Москва

Ruslan V. Royuk — M.D., Cand.Sc.(Med); Head, Urology Division.

Moscow

royuk@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4543-1480

Яровой

С. К.

Yarovoy

S. K.

Сергей Константинович Яровой — доктор медицинских наук; главный научный сотрудник, врач-клинический фармаколог НИИ урологии и интервенционной радиологии им. Н.А. Лопаткина — филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России; врач-клинический фармаколог ГБУЗ «ГКБ им. Д.Д. Плетнева ДЗМ».

Москва

Sergey K. Yarovoy — M.D., Dr.Sc.(Med); Chief Researcher, Clinical Pharmacologist, Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Centre; Clinical Pharmacologist, Pletnev City Clinical Hospital — Moscow Healthcare Department.

Moscow

yarovoy.sk@yandex.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8106-6885

Аксёнов

Г. А.

Aksenov

G. A.

Георгий Андреевич Аксёнов — студент.

Москва

Georgy A. Aksenov — Student.

Moscow

aksionoff.ga@gmail.com

Главный военный клинический госпиталь им. академика Н.Н. БурденкоРоссияBurdenko Main Military Clinical HospitalRussian Federation

Научно-исследовательский институт урологии и интервенционной радиологии им. Н.А. Лопаткина; Городская клиническая больница им. Д.Д. ПлетнёваРоссияLopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology; Pletnev City Clinical HospitalRussian Federation

Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет им. Н.И. ПироговаРоссияPirogov Russian National Research Medical UniversityRussian Federation

2023

19072023

112154163

2023

Роюк Р.В., Яровой С.К., Аксёнов Г.А.

Royuk R.V., Yarovoy S.K., Aksenov G.A.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/730

Выбор оперативного метода лечения нефролитиаза остаётся предметом дискуссий. Статья представляет собой обзор литературы, посвящённый сравнительному анализу эффективности и безопасности дистанционной ударно-волновой литотрипсии (ДУВЛ) и эндоскопических методов лечения нефролитиаза. В основу написания литературного обзора лёг анализ статей, опубликованных в базах электронных научных библиотек PubMed / MEDLINE, eLibrary. Проанализировано 60 публикации по теме обзора. В результате анализа данных установлено, что эндоскопические методы лечения имеют существенное преимущество перед ДУВЛ при сопоставимой безопасности. Развитие и распространение менее инвазивных методик, таких как мини-перкутанная нефролитотрипсия и ультрамини-перкутанная нефролитотрипсия в будущем возможно изменит взгляд на подход к оперативному лечению любых форм нефролитиаза.

The choice of surgical treatment for nephrolithiasis remains a matter of debate. The article is a literature review dedicated to a comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic methods for the treatment of nephrolithiasis. The literature review was based on the analysis of articles published in the PubMed / MEDLINE, and eLibrary databases. Sixty publications on the topic of the review were analysed. As a result of data analysis, endoscopic therapies have a significant advantage over ESWL with comparable safety. The development and dissemination of less invasive techniques such as mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the future may change the approach to the surgical treatment of any form of nephrolithiasis.

перкутанная нефролитотрипсиядистанционная ударно-волновая нефролитотрипсияретроградная интраренальная хирургиякамни в почкахнефролитиазпослеоперационные осложненияобзор литературы

percutaneous nephrolithotomyextracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyretrograde intrarenal surgerykidney stonesnephrolithiasispostoperative complicationsreview

Исследование не имело спонсорской поддержки

The study was not sponsored

References1

Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR. Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol. 2017;58(5):299-306. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.299

Каприн А.Д., Аполихин О.И., Сивков А.В., Анохин Н.В., Гаджиев Н.К., Малхасян В.А., Акопян Г.Н., Просянников М.Ю. Заболеваемость мочекаменной болезнью в Российской Федерации с 2005 по 2020 гг. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2022;15(2)10-17. DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-10-17

Kaprin A.D., Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V., Anokhin N.V., Gadzhiev N.K., Malkhasyan V.A., Akopyan G.N., Prosyannikov M.Yu. The incidence of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2020. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2022;15(2)10-17. (In Russian). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-2-10-17

Просянников М.Ю., Анохин Н.В., Войтко Д.А., Шевчук И.М., Перепанова Т.С., Константинова О.В., Сивков А.В., Алексеев Б.Я., Аполихин О.И., Каприн А.Д. Факторы риска нефролитиаза после радикальной цистэктомии с кишечной пластикой мочевого пузыря. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2022;15(3)70-81. DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-70-81

Prosyannikov M.Yu., Anokhin N.V., Voytko D.A., Shevchuk I.M., Perepanova T.S., Konstantinova O.V., Sivkov A.V., Alekseev B.Ya., Apolikhin O.I., Kaprin A.D. Risk factors for nephrolithiasis after radical cystectomy with intestinal plasty of the bladder. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2022;15(3)70-81. DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-70-81

Дутов В.В. Дистанционная ударно-волновая литотрипсия: назад в будущее. РМЖ. 2014;22(29):2077-2086. eLIBRARY ID: 22989695; EDN: TJCEGJ

Dutov V.V. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: back to the future. RSJ. 2014;22(29):2077-2086. (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 22989695; EDN: TJCEGJ

Медведев В.Л., Буданов А.А., Дмитренко Г.Д., Палагута Г.А., Розенкранц А.М. Сравнительная эффективность дистанционной ударно-волновой литотрипсии и ретроградной внутрипочечной хирургии при кальций-оксалатном нефролитиазе. Инновационная медицина Кубани. 2021;(1):39-46. DOI: 10.35401/2500-0268-2021-21-1-39-46

Medvedev V.L., Budanov A.A., Dmitrenko G.D., Palaguta G.A., Rozenkranc A.M. Comparative efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2021;(1):39-46. (In Russian). DOI: 10.35401/2500-0268-2021-21-1-39-46

Hassan M, El-Nahas AR, Sheir KZ, El-Tabey NA, El-Assmy AM, Elshal AM, Shokeir AA. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20-30 mm single renal pelvic stone. Arab J Urol. 2015;13(3):212-6. Erratum in: Arab J Urol. 2016;14(1):73. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.04.002

Tsai SH, Chung HJ, Tseng PT, Wu YC, Tu YK, Hsu CW, Lei WT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(10):e19403. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019403

Gao X, Hu X, Wang W, Chen J, Wei T, Wei X. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for the medium-sized renal stones. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(2):187-195. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04185-0

Kim CH, Chung DY, Rha KH, Lee JY, Lee SH. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;57(1):26. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57010026

Gürbüz ZG, Şener NC, Vuruşkan E, Deniz ME, Gürlen G, Ortoğlu F. Small renal pelvis stones: Shock wave lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopy? A match-pair analysis. Turk J Urol. 2018;45(3):202-205. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.70094

Wang Y, Chang X, Li J, Han Z. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(6):902-926. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0550

Gadelmoula M, Elderwy AA, Abdelkawi IF, Moeen AM, Althamthami G, Abdel-Moneim AM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for high-density moderate-sized renal stones: A prospective randomized study. Urol Ann. 2019;11(4):426-431. DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_63_19

Bowen DK, Song L, Faerber J, Kim J, Scales CD Jr, Tasian GE. Re-Treatment after Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Population Based Comparative Effectiveness Study. J Urol. 2020;203(6):1156-1162. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000712

EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands. Accessed January 15, 2023 http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/

Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1161-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091

Мами Д. Е., Сенгирбаев Д. И., Малих М. А. Сравнительная оценка эффективности малоинвазивных методов лечения мочекаменной болезни. Медицина (Алматы). 2019;5(203):80-87. DOI: 10.31082/1728-452X-2019-203-5-80-87

Mami D.E., Sengirbaev D.I., Malikh M.A. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of minimally invasive treatment of urolithiasis. Meditsina (Almaty) = Medicine (Almaty). 2019;5(203):80-87 (In Russian). DOI: 10.31082/1728-452X-2019-203-5-80-87

Клинические рекомендации. Мочекаменная болезнь. 2020. Ссылка активна на 15.01.2023. Accessed January 15, 2023. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/7_1.

Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Mochekamennaya bolezn'. 2020. (In Russian). Accessed January 15, 2023. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/7_1.

Inoue T, Okada S, Hamamoto S, Fujisawa M. Retrograde intrarenal surgery: Past, present, and future. Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62(2):121-135. DOI: 10.4111/icu.20200526

Zeng G, Traxer O, Zhong W, Osther P, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Mazzon G, Seitz C, Geavlete P, Fiori C, Ghani KR, Chew BH, Git KA, Vicentini FC, Papatsoris A, Brehmer M, Martinez JL, Cheng J, Cheng F, Gao X, Gadzhiev N, Pietropaolo A, Proietti S, Ye Z, Sarica K. International Alliance of Urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int. 2023;131(2):153-164. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15836

Patel RM, Okhunov Z, Clayman RV, Landman J. Prone Versus Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: What Is Your Position? Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(4):26. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0676-9

Birowo P, Tendi W, Widyahening IS, Rasyid N, Atmoko W. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res. 2020;9:231. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.22940.3

Zhao Z, Fan J, Liu Y, de la Rosette J, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: position, position, position! Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):79-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-1019-5

Liatsikos E, Tsaturyan A, Kallidonis P. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Stone Disease: Which Position? Prone Position! Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021;16;35:6-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.07.009

Giusti G, Pavia MP, Rico L, Proietti S. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Which Position? Supine Position! Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021;35:1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.005

Proietti S, Rodríguez-Socarrás ME, Eisner B, De Coninck V, Sofer M, Saitta G, Rodriguez-Monsalve M, D'Orta C, Bellinzoni P, Gaboardi F, Giusti G. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: tips and tricks. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S381-S388. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.07.09

Xu KW, Huang J, Guo ZH, Lin TX, Zhang CX, Liu H, Chun J, Yao YS, Han JL, Huang H. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in semisupine position: a modified approach for renal calculus. Urol Res. 2011;39(6):467-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0366-x

Arrabal-Polo MA, Arrabal-Martin M, Saz T, Paiz P. Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy in supine-oblique position without cushion. Urol Res. 2011;39(6):521-2. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0384-8

Kerbl K, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, Urban DA, De Leo BC, Carbone JM. Percutaneous stone removal with the patient in a flank position. J Urol. 1994;151(3):686-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35048-6

Liaw CW, Khusid JA, Gallante B, Bamberger JN, Atallah WM, Gupta M. The T-Tilt Position: A Novel Modified Patient Position to Improve Stone-Free Rates in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Urol. 2021;206(5):1232-1239. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001948

Hamamoto S, Okada S, Inoue T, Taguchi K, Kawase K, Okada T, Chaya R, Hattori T, Okada A, Matsuda T, Yasui T; SMART Study Group. Comparison of the safety and efficacy between the prone split-leg and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: A multi-institutional analysis. Int J Urol. 2021;28(11):1129-1135. DOI: 10.1111/iju.14655

Peng L, Zheng Z, Xu J, Zhong W. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in lateral position for lower pole stone: an initial experience from Single Academic Hospital. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(2):199-203. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-021-01297-9

Гулиев Б. Г., Комяков Б. К., Стецик Е. О., Заикин А. Ю. Эффективность и безопасность перкутанной нефролитотрипсии через верхнюю чашку. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2019;(2):54-59. DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2019-11-2-54-59

Guliev B. G., Komyakov B. K., Stecik E. O., Zaikin A. YU. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy through the upper calyx. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2019;(2):54-59. (In Russian). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2019-11-2-54-59

Li J, Gao L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Jiang Q. Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019;66:62-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.016

Parikh KP, Jain RJ, Kandarp AP. Is retrograde intrarenal surgery the game changer in the management of upper tract calculi? A single-center single-surgeon experience of 131 cases. Urol Ann. 2018;10(1):29-34. DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_118_17

Tonyalı Ş, Yılmaz M, Karaaslan M, Ceylan C, Işıkay L. Prediction of stone-free status after single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones. Turk J Urol. 2018;44(6):473-477. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.88615

Bozzini G, Verze P, Arcaniolo D, Dal Piaz O, Buffi NM, Guazzoni G, Provenzano M, Osmolorskij B, Sanguedolce F, Montanari E, Macchione N, Pummer K, Mirone V, De Sio M, Taverna G. A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience: A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones. World J Urol. 2017;35(12):1967-1975. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2084-7

Chung DY, Kang DH, Cho KS, Jeong WS, Jung HD, Kwon JK, Lee SH, Lee JY. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211316

de Oliveira JMI, Selegatto IB, Simoes GCS, Ottaiano AD, Neto WA, Reis LO. Analysis of surgical complications of percutaneous nephrolythotomy, in the first three years, in a teaching hospital. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2021;9(6):497-503. PMID: 34993269; PMCID: PMC8727786.

Трусов П.В., Белоусов И.И., Коган М.И., Гусев А.А. Критерии эффективности и безопасности перкутанной хирургии крупных почечных камней. Вопросы урологии и андрологии. 2019;7(3):46-53. DOI: 10.20953/2307-6631-2019-3-46-53

Trusov P.V., Belousov I.I., Kogan M.I., Gusev A. A. Criteria of the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous surgery for large kidney stones. Vopr. urol. androl. (Urology and Andrology). 2019;7(3):46-53. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20953/2307-6631-2019-3-46-53

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Gadzhiev N, Malkhasyan V, Akopyan G, Petrov S, Jefferson F, Okhunov Z. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: Troubleshooting and managing complications. Asian J Urol. 2020;7(2):139-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.10.004

Kumar GM, Nirmal KP, Kumar GS. Postoperative infective complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Ann. 2021;13(4):340-345. DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_153_20

Palmero Martí JL, Ganau Ituren A, Valls González L. Resultados actuales de la CRIR y comparación con NLPC [Current results of RIRS and comparison with PCNL.]. Arch Esp Urol. 2017;70(1):147-154. (In Spanish). PMID: 28221150

Cheng Y, Xu R. Effectiveness and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the treatment of isolated kidney stones. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14(3):1849-1858. PMID: 35422937; PMCID: PMC8991168

Чернышев И.В., Меринов Д.С., Епишов В.А., Павлов Д.А., Фатихов Р.Р. Возможности ретроградной интраренальной хирургии в лечении крупных и коралловидных камней почек. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2012;(4):67-73. eLIBRARY ID: 18348725; EDN: PLNQVX

Chernyshev I.V., Merinov D.S., Epishov V.A., Pavlov D.A., Fatihov R.R. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of large and staghorn kidney stones. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2012;(4):67-73. (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 18348725; EDN: PLNQVX

Grosso AA, Sessa F, Campi R, Viola L, Polverino P, Crisci A, Salvi M, Liatsikos E, Feu OA, DI Maida F, Tellini R, Traxer O, Cocci A, Mari A, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Carini M, Tuccio A, Minervini A. Intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications after ureteroscopy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(3):309-332. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04294-4

Аляев Ю.Г., Рапопорт Л.М., Руденко В.И. Современные аспекты классификации осложнений дистанционной литотрипсии. Урология. 2014;(6):57-60. eLIBRARY ID: 22810151; EDN: TFEAGZ

Alyaev Yu. G., Rapoport L. M., Rudenko V. I. Modern aspects of the classification of complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy. Urology. 2014;(6):57-60. (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 22810151; EDN: TFEAGZ

Telegrafo M, Carluccio DA, Rella L, Ianora AA, Angelelli G, Moschetta M. Diagnostic and prognostic role of computed tomography in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy complications. Urol Ann. 2016;8(2):168-72. DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.163792

Gokce MI, Tokatli Z, Suer E, Hajiyev P, Akinci A, Esen B. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42(1):96-100. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0023

Resorlu B, Unsal A, Ziypak T, Diri A, Atis G, Guven S, Sancaktutar AA, Tepeler A, Bozkurt OF, Oztuna D. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones. World J Urol. 2013;31(6):1581-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0991-1

Kartal I, Çakıcı MÇ, Selmi V, Sarı S, Özdemir H, Ersoy H. Retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of stones in horseshoe kidney; what are the advantages and disadvantages compared to each other? Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(2):156-162. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1906

Wang F, Hong Y, Yang Z, Ye L. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of stones at ureteropelvic junction with high-grade hydronephrosis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14050. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93551-8

Fayad MK, Fahmy O, Abulazayem KM, Salama NM. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal pelvic stone more than 2 centimeters: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(1):113-117. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-021-01289-9

Ghazala SG, Saeed Ahmed SM, Mohammed AA. Can mini PCNL achieve the same results as RIRS? The initial single center experience. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;68:102632. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102632

Серёгин И.В., Серёгин А.А., Филимонов Е.В., Шустицкий Н.А., Морозов А.Д., Синякова Л.А., Лоран О.Б. Ультрамини-перкутанная нефролитотрипсия и ретроградная интраренальная хирургия при лечении камней почек менее 2 см: сравнительные результаты эффективности и безопасности. Креативная хирургия и онкология. 2022;12(2):98-105. DOI: 10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-2-98-105

Seregin I.V., Seregin A.A., Filimonov E.V., Shustitskiy N.A., Morozov A.D., Sinyakova L.A., Loran O.B. Ultra-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Treatment of Less than 2 cm Kidney Stones: Comparative Efficacy and Safety. Creative surgery and oncology. 2022;12(2):98-105. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24060/2076-3093-2022-12-2-98-105

Bagcioglu M, Demir A, Sulhan H, Karadag MA, Uslu M, Tekdogan UY. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of cost-effectiveness: analysis of 111 procedures. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(4):339-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0828-7

Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Hein S, Adams F, Schlager D, Wetterauer U, Hawizy A, Bourdoumis A, Desai J, Miernik A. Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of treatment costs (endoscopes and disposables) in patients with renal stones 10-20 mm. World J Urol. 2015;33(10):1601-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1489-4

Bozzini G, Aydogan TB, Müller A, Sighinolfi MC, Besana U, Calori A, Lorenzo B, Govorov A, Pushkar DY, Pini G, Pastore AL, Romero-Otero J, Rocco B, Buizza C. A comparison among PCNL, Miniperc and Ultraminiperc for lower calyceal stones between 1 and 2 cm: a prospective, comparative, multicenter and randomised study. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):67. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-020-00636-z

Deng J, Li J, Wang L, Hong Y, Zheng L, Hu J, Kuang R. Standard versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a meta-analysis. Scand J Surg. 2021;110(3):301-311. DOI: 10.1177/1457496920920474

Haghighi R, Zeraati H, Ghorban Zade M. Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus standard PCNL: A randomised clinical trial. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(4):294-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.10.003

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.