<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">urovest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник урологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Urology Herald</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2308-6424</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Rostov State Medical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-1-14-21</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">urovest-410</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Долгосрочные результаты эффективности и безопасности имплантации искусственного мочевого сфинктера AMS 800ТМ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Long-term efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800ТМ implantations</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-7224</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Велиев</surname><given-names>Е. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Veliev</surname><given-names>E. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Евгений Ибадович Велиев — доктор медицинских наук; профессор кафедры урологии и хирургической андрологии ФГБОУ ДПО РМАНПО Минздрава России; заведующий онкоурологическим отделением ГБУЗ ГКБ им. С.П. Боткина ДЗМ.</p><p>125284, Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, д. 5; 125993, Москва, ул. Баррикадная, д. 2/1, стр. 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Evgeniy I. Veliev — M.D., Dr.Sc.(M); Prof., Dept. of Urology and Surgical Andrology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Head, Urology Division, S.P. Botkin's State Clinical Hospital.</p><p>125284, Moscow, 5 2nd Botkinsky fy; 125993, Moscow, 2/1 Barrikadnaya st.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">veliev@urotop.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9286-5930</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Томилов</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tomilov</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Андрей Александрович Томилов — кандидат медицинских наук; врач-уролог ГБУЗ ГКБ им. С.П. Боткина ДЗМ.</p><p>125284, Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, д. 5; тел.: + 7 (926) 386-27-41</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Andrey A. Tomilov — M.D., Cand.Sc.(M); Urologist, Urology Division, S.P. Botkin's State Clinical Hospital.</p><p>125284, Moscow, 5 2nd Botkinsky fy; tel.: + 7 (926) 386-27-41</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">toandrei33@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-2955</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Голубцова</surname><given-names>Е. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Golubtsova</surname><given-names>E. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Елена Николаевна Голубцова — кандидат медицинских наук; ассистент кафедры урологии и хирургической андрологии ФГБОУ ДПО РМАНПО Минздрава России; врач-уролог ГБУЗ ГКБ им. С.П. Боткина ДЗМ.</p><p>125284, Москва, 2-й Боткинский пр-д, д. 5; 125993, Москва, ул. Баррикадная, д. 2/1, стр. 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Elena N. Golubtsova — M.D., Cand.Sc.(M); Assist., Dept. of Urology and Surgical andrology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Urologist, Urology Division, S.P. Botkin's State Clinical Hospital.</p><p>125284, Moscow, 5 2nd Botkinsky fy; 125993, Moscow, 2/1 Barrikadnaya st.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">engolubtsova@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ГБУЗ Городская клиническая больница имени С.П. Боткина Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы; ФГБОУ ДПО Российская медицинская академия непрерывного профессионального образования Минздрава России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>S.P. Botkin State Clinical Hospital; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ГБУЗ Городская клиническая больница имени С.П. Боткина Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>S.P. Botkin State Clinical Hospital</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>03</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Велиев Е.И., Томилов А.А., Голубцова Е.Н., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Велиев Е.И., Томилов А.А., Голубцова Е.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Veliev E.I., Tomilov A.A., Golubtsova E.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/410">https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/410</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Стрессовая форма инконтиненции у мужчин в большинстве случаев возникает после радикальной простатэктомии или вмешательств при лечении гиперплазии простаты. Помимо существенного снижения качества жизни, лечение и уход за подобными пациентами требует значительных финансовых затрат.</p></sec><sec><title>Цель исследования</title><p>Цель исследования. Изучение эффективности и безопасности имплантации искусственного мочевого сфинктера (ИМС) при долгосрочном наблюдении.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. С 2004 по 2020 год ИМС имплантирован 52 пациентам со стрессовым недержанием мочи (НМ) тяжелой степени. Потери мочи оценены с помощью дневника мочеиспускания. Выздоровлением считалось использование ≤ 1 прокладки в сутки («социальная континенция»). Качество жизни оценено с помощью цифровой шкалы (от 0 до 100), IPSS QoL и опросника ICIQ-UI SF. Осложнения описаны согласно классификации Clavien-Dindo.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Медиана возраста составила 67,5 лет (IQR 63 - 72 года). Причинами стрессового НМ тяжелой степени были следующие вмешательства: радикальная простатэктомия — 29 (55,8%) пациентов, трансуретральная резекция простаты — 12 (23,1%), чреспузырная аденомэктомия — 5 (9,6%), другие — 6 (11,5%) пациентов. Медиана времени после вмешательства, послужившего причиной НМ, составила 24 месяца (IQR 13 - 36 месяцев). Использовались как промежностный (67%), так и пеноскротальный (33%) доступы. Оценены результаты эффективности имплантации 43 пациентов. При медиане наблюдения 100,4 месяцев (IQR 70,5 - 136,9 месяцев) отмечено статистически значимое снижение медианы потерь мочи с 800 ml (IQR 700 - 1100 ml) до 0 ml (IQR 0 - 30 ml). Также отмечено статистически значимое сокращение использования прокладок в сутки с 7 (IQR 6 - 8) до 1 (IQR 0 - 1). Критериям выздоровления соответствовали 36 (84%) пациентов. Улучшение отмечено у 6 (14%) пациентов, неудача — у 1 (2%) пациента. Медиана баллов IPSS QoL снизилась с 4 (IQR 4 - 5) до 2 (IQR 1 - 2), p &lt; 0,05, баллы цифровой аналоговой шкалы улучшились с 25 (IQR 20 - 35) до 80 (IQR 60 - 90), p &lt; 0,05. После лечения балл опросника ICIQ-UI SF составил 7 (1 - 9). Осложнения более II степени согласно классификации Clavien-Dindo отмечены у 15 (28,8%) пациентов.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. При долгосрочном наблюдении имплантация ИМС обеспечивает удовлетворительные результаты в отношении сокращения потерь мочи и улучшения качества жизни, но сопровождается высокой частотой осложнений и ревизий.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. Stress urinary incontinence in men in most cases occurs after radical prostatectomy or surgery of benign prostate hyperplasia. In addition to a significant reduction in the quality of life, the treatment and care of such patients require significant financial costs.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose of the study</title><p>Purpose of the study. To study the long-term efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Materials and methods. AUS was implanted in 52 patients with severe stress urinary incontinence (UI) from 2004 to 2020. Urine loss was estimated by the urinary diary. A cure was considered as the use of ≤ 1 pad per day («social continence»). The quality of life was assessed using a numeric scale (from 0 to 100), IPSS-QoL, and the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire. Complications were described according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The median age was 67.5 years (IQR 63 - 72 years). The causes of severe stress UI were the following: radical prostatectomy - 29 (55.8%) patients, transurethral resection of the prostate — 12 (23.1%), transvesical simple prostatectomy — 5 (9.6%), others — 6 (11.5%) patients. Median time after the intervention that caused UI was 24 months (IQR 13-36 months). Both perineal (67%) and penoscrotal (33%) approaches were used. The results of implantation efficiency were evaluated in 43 patients. A significant decrease in the median urine loss from 800 ml (IQR 700 - 1100 ml) to 0 ml (IQR 0-30 ml) was registered at a median follow-up of 100.4 months (IQR 70.5 - 136.9 months). There was also a statistically significant reduction in daily pad use from 7 (IQR 6-8) to 1 (IQR 0 - 1). 36 (84%) patients met the cure criteria. Improvement was noted in 6 (14%) patients, failure - in 1 (2%) patient. Median IPSS-QoL scores decreased from 4 (IQR 4-5) to 2 (IQR 1 - 2), p &lt; 0.05, numeric analog scale scores improved from 25 (IQR 20 - 35) to 80 (IQR 60 - 90), p &lt; 0.05., The ICIQ-UI SF score was 7 (IQR 1-9) after treatment. Complications more than grade II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were registered in 15 (28.8%) patients.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. AUS implantation provides satisfactory results in reducing urine loss and improving quality of life but it's accompanied by a high rate of complications and revisions in long-term follow-up.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>искусственный мочевой сфинктер</kwd><kwd>стрессовое недержание мочи у мужчин</kwd><kwd>осложнения радикальной простатэктомии</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>artificial urinary sphincter</kwd><kwd>stress urinary incontinence in men</kwd><kwd>complications of radical prostatectomy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, Eds. Incontinence 6th Edition. ICI-ICS. International Continence Society, Bristol UK; 2017. ISBN: 978-0956960733</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, Eds. Incontinence 6th Edition. ICI-ICS. International Continence Society, Bristol UK; 2017. ISBN: 978-0956960733</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carson CC. Artificial urinary sphincter: current status and future directions. Asian J Androl. 2020;22(2):154-157. DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_5_20</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carson CC. Artificial urinary sphincter: current status and future directions. Asian J Androl. 2020;22(2):154-157. DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_5_20</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Penson DF, McLerran D, Feng Z, Li L, Albertsen PC, Gilliland FD, Hamilton A, Hoffman RM, Stephenson RA, Potosky AL, Stanford JL. 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1701-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154637.38262.3a</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Penson DF, McLerran D, Feng Z, Li L, Albertsen PC, Gilliland FD, Hamilton A, Hoffman RM, Stephenson RA, Potosky AL, Stanford JL. 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol.	2005;173(5):1701-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154637.38262.3a</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, Kattan MW, Schrag D, Warren JL, Scardino PT. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1138-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa011788</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, Kattan MW, Schrag D, Warren JL, Scardino PT. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1138-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa011788</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Steineck G, Helgesen F, Adolfsson J, Dickman PW, Johansson JE, Norlen BJ, Holmberg L; Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(11):790-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa021483</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Steineck G, Helgesen F, Adolfsson J, Dickman PW, Johansson JE, Norlen BJ, Holmberg L; Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(11):790-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa021483</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim PH, Pinheiro LC, Atoria CL, Eastham JA, Sandhu JS, Elkin EB. Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis. J Urol. 2013;189(2):602-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.246</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim PH, Pinheiro LC, Atoria CL, Eastham JA, Sandhu JS, Elkin EB. Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis. J Urol. 2013;189(2):602-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.246</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nam RK, Herschorn S, Loblaw DA, Liu Y, Klotz LH, Carr LK, Ko-dama RT, Stanimirovic A, Venkateswaran V, Saskin R, Law CH, Urbach DR, Narod SA. Population based study of long-term rates of surgery for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188(2):502-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nam RK, Herschorn S, Loblaw DA, Liu Y, Klotz LH, Carr LK, Kodama RT, Stanimirovic A, Venkateswaran V, Saskin R, Law CH, Urbach DR, Narod SA. Population based study of longterm rates of surgery for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188(2):502-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stothers L, Thom D, Calhoun E. Urologic diseases in America project: urinary incontinence in males--demographics and economic burden. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1302-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155503.12545.4e</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stothers L, Thom D, Calhoun E. Urologic diseases in America project: urinary incontinence in males--demographics and economic burden. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1302-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155503.12545.4e</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, B0 K, Corcos J, Fowler C, Laycock J, Lim PH, van Lunsen R, a Nijeholt GL, Pemberton J, Wang A, Watier A, Van Kerrebroeck P. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(4):374-80. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20144</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, B0 K, Corcos J, Fowler C, Laycock J, Lim PH, van Lunsen R, a Nijeholt GL, Pemberton J, Wang A, Watier A, Van Kerrebroeck P. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(4):374-80. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20144</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY, Rha KH. Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches? Int J Urol. 2013;20(3):271-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY, Rha KH. Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches? Int J Urol. 2013;20(3):271-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Froehner M, Koch R, Leike S, Novotny V, Twelker L, Wirth MP. Urinary tract-related quality of life after radical prostatectomy: open retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Urol Int. 2013;90(1):36-40. DOI: 10.1159/000345320</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Froehner M, Koch R, Leike S, Novotny V, Twelker L, Wirth MP. Urinary tract-related quality of life after radical prostatectomy: open retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Urol Int. 2013;90(1):36-40. DOI: 10.1159/000345320</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ostrowski I, Blewniewski M, Neugart F, von Heyden B, Selvag-gio O, Iori F, Foley S, Fernandez Arjona M, Carvajal Obando A, Pottek T. Multicentre experience with ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. Urologia. 2017;84(3):148-152. DOI: 10.5301/uj.5000246</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ostrowski I, Blewniewski M, Neugart F, von Heyden B, Selvaggio O, Iori F, Foley S, Fernandez Arjona M, Carvajal Obando A, Pottek T. Multicentre experience with ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. Urologia. 2017;84(3):148-152. DOI: 10.5301/uj.5000246</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, White RW, Stone AR. Postprostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol. 1996;156(6):1975-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65408-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, White RW, Stone AR. Postprostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol. 1996;156(6):1975-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65408-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raj GV, Peterson AC, Toh KL, Webster GD. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1242-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152315.91444.d0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raj GV, Peterson AC, Toh KL, Webster GD. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1242-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152315.91444.d0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Велиев Е.И., Томилов А.А. Современные возможности диагностики и лечения недержания мочи у мужчин. М.: АО «Видаль Рус», 2020. ISBN 978-5-6044438-1-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veliev E.I., Tomilov A.A. Sovremennye vozmozhnosti diagnostiki i lechenija nederzhanija mochi u muzhchin. Moscow: AO "Vidal' Rus", 2020. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-56044438-1-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ripert T, Pierrevelcin J. Comparative study of urodynamic tests after AMS 800 and ZSI 375 insertion. Urologia. 2018;85(1):15-18. DOI: 10.5301/uj.5000271</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ripert T, Pierrevelcin J. Comparative study of urodynamic tests after AMS 800 and ZSI 375 insertion. Urologia. 2018;85(1):15-18. DOI: 10.5301/uj.5000271</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN; Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):681-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.034</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN; Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):681-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.034</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rehder P, Haab F, Cornu JN, Gozzi C, Bauer RM. Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):140-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.038</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rehder P, Haab F, Cornu JN, Gozzi C, Bauer RM. Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):140-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.038</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">De Ridder D, Rehder P. The AdVance male sling: anatomic features in relation to mode of action. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 2011;10:383-389. DOI: 10.1016/j.eursup.2011.04.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">De Ridder D, Rehder P. The AdVance male sling: anatomic features in relation to mode of action. Eur Urol. Suppl. 2011;10:383-389. DOI: 10.1016/j.eursup.2011.04.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Osman NI. Slings in the management of male stress urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23(6):528-35. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328364fae1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Osman NI. Slings in the management of male stress urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23(6):528-35. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328364fae1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lai HH, Boone TB. Complex artificial urinary sphincter revision and reimplantation cases-how do they fare compared to virgin cases? J Urol. 2012;187(3):951-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.153</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lai HH, Boone TB. Complex artificial urinary sphincter revision and reimplantation cases-how do they fare compared to virgin cases? J Urol. 2012;187(3):951-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.153</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
