<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">urovest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник урологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Urology Herald</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2308-6424</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Rostov State Medical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21886/2308-6424-2018-6-1-5-17</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">urovest-187</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ТРУДНОСТИ В СИСТЕМАТИЗАЦИИ ПОСЛЕОПЕРАЦОННЫХ ОСЛОЖНЕНИЙ ЭНДОСКОПИЧЕСКОГО ЛЕЧЕНИЯ УРОЛИТИАЗА И ПУТИ ИХ РЕШЕНИЯ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>DIFFICULTIES OF SYSTEMATIZATION OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT FOR UROLITHIASIS AND THE SOLUTION WAYS OF THE PROBLEM</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-3443</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гиясов</surname><given-names>Ш. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Giyasov</surname><given-names>Sh. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>уролог-консультант;</p><p>д.м.н., доцент, директор программы магистратуры кафедры урологии,</p><p>Ташкент</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Consultant urologist;</p><p>Doctor of medicine, assistant professor, director of masters’ program of Urology department, </p><p>Tashkent</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">dr.sh.giyasov@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4434-5460</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Акилов</surname><given-names>Ф. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Akilov</surname><given-names>F. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>уролог-консультант;</p><p>д.м.н., профессор, заведующий кафедрой урологии Ташкентской медицинской академии,</p><p>Ташкент</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Consultant urologist;</p><p>Doctor of medicine, professor, head of Urology department, </p><p>Tashkent</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">r.s.c.u@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>АО «Республиканский Специализированный Центр Урологии»; &#13;
Ташкентская медицинская академия</institution><country>Узбекистан</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Republican Specialized Center of Urology; &#13;
Tashkent Medical Academy</institution><country>Uzbekistan</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Гиясов Ш.И., Акилов Ф.А., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Гиясов Ш.И., Акилов Ф.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Giyasov S.I., Akilov F.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/187">https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/187</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Актуальность</title><p>Актуальность. Классификация послеоперационных осложнений Clavien-Dindo признана эффективной для ведения мониторинга осложнений и сравнения данных между различными центрами. Но для объективной оценки осложнений для каждого метода оперативного лечения должна быть разработана общепринятая норма послеоперационного течения с учетом специфики вмешательства. Отсутствие подобной нормы в эндоскопическом лечении уролитиаза приводит к ошибкам при оценке послеоперационных осложнений.</p></sec><sec><title>Цель исследования</title><p>Цель исследования. Критическая оценка классификации хирургических осложнений Clavien-Dindo и её адаптация для оценки послеоперационных осложнений эндоскопической хирургии уролитиаза.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. Ретроспективно проанализированы результаты 1027 эндоскопических вмешательств по поводу уролитиаза. Средний возраст больных составил 38,9±15,6 (от 4 до 84) лет. C позиции эндоскопической хирургии больных с «простым» камнем было 446 (43,4 %), со «сложным» — 581 (56,6 %). Камни были расположены в чашечно-лоханочной системе (ЧЛС) у 765 (74,5 %) больных, в ЧЛС и в мочеточнике — у 60 (5,8 %), только в мочеточнике — у 202 (19,7 %). Размер камней, расположенных в ЧЛС и мочеточнике, составил 30,3 ± 0,6 (от 3 до 150) мм; в мочеточнике — 14,4 ± 0,5 (от 3 до 55) мм. В 948 случаев из 1027 камни были удалены чрескожным доступом (в положении больного на животе), в 79 — трансуретральным. Независимо от вида доступа выполнялась только пневматическая литотрипсия, что дало возможность объективно оценить эффективность лечения в различных группах. Для систематизации осложнений была использована классификация хирургических осложнений Clavien-Dindo (2004).</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Исходя из многолетнего опыта сотрудников РСЦУ в эндоскопическом лечении уролитиаза, а также путем определения категории сложности мочевых камней с позиции эндоскопической хирургии, была определена четкая граница между нормальным послеоперационным периодом и осложнённым. Отклонением от стандарта послеоперационного периода оказались 250 осложнений у 195 (19,0 %) больных, которые были систематизированы путём критической оценки и коррекции классификации Clavien-Dindo: I – 64 (6,2 %), II – 111 (10,8 %), IIIa – 33 (3,2 %), IIIb – 39 (3,8 %), Iva – 3 (0,3 %), IVb – 0, V – 0. </p></sec><sec><title>Выводы</title><p>Выводы. Оптимально адаптировать классификацию хирургических осложнений Clavien-Dindo применительно к эндоскопической хирургии уролитиаза возможно только через разработку показателей нормального-стандартного послеоперационного течения эндоскопического лечения уролитиаза. Cтандарт, в свою очередь, должен быть принят урологическим сообществом. И только тогда можно объективно сравнивать результаты лечения между различными центрами.</p><p>Согласно адаптированной классификации Clavien-Dindo, 70 % осложнений эндоскопического лечения уролитиаза оказались осложнениями I-II степени и были ликвидированы консервативной терапией, 30 % — отнесены к III-IV степени, и для их устранения потребовались дополнительные инвазивные вмешательства и интенсивная терапия.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Actuality</title><p>Actuality. Classification of postoperative complications Clavien-Dindo is designed to monitor complications and compare data between different centers. But for an objective assessment of complications, for each method of surgical treatment, a generally accepted norm of postoperative course should be developed, taking into account the specifics of the intervention. The absence of such a norm in the endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis leads to mistakes in the evaluation of postoperative complications.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose of research</title><p>Purpose of research. Critical assessment of Clavien-Dindo grading system for surgical complications and its adaptation for evaluation of postoperative complications of endoscopic surgery for urolithiasis.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Materials and methods. Retrospectively evaluated 1027 patients with urolithiasis who were operated endoscopically. The average age was 38.9 ± 15.6 (4 to 84) years. From the position of endoscopic surgery patients with “simple” stone were 446 (43.4 %), with “complex” — 581 (56.6 %). In 765 (74.5 %) patients stones were located in PCS, in PCS and ureter — in 60 (5.8 %), only in the ureter — in 202 (19.7 %). Size of stones in 1027 arranged 30.3 ± 0.6 (3 to 150) mm; located only in the ureter — 14.4 ± 0.5 (3 to 55) mm.</p><p>From 1027 cases in 948 stones were removed via PC access (in the prone position), in 79 - transurethral. Regardless of the type of access only pneumatic lithotripsy were performed, which made possible to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of treatment in different groups. For systematization of complications Clavien-Dindo (2004) grading system was used.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. Based on many years of experience of the RSCU’s staff in the endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis, as well by determining the category of complexity urinary stones from the position of endoscopic surgery, a clear boundary was determined between the normal postoperative period and the complicated one. Deviations from the standard of the postoperative period were found in 195 (19.0 %) patients with 250 complications, which were systematized by the way of critical evaluation and correction of the ClavienDindo classification: I – 64 (6.2 %), II – 111 (10.8 %), IIIa – 33 (3.2 %), IIIb – 39 (3.8 %), Iva – 3 (0.3 %), IVb – 0, V – 0.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Conclusions. In order to optimally adapt the classification of surgical complications Clavien-Dindo, in relation to endoscopic surgery for urolithiasis, it was necessary to develop indicators standard of normal postoperative course of endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis. In turn, standard course must be accepted by Urology society. And only thereafter it will be possible to objectively compare the results of treatment between different centers.</p><p>According to adapted Clavien-Dindo classification 70 % of complications of endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis were I - II grade and they were eliminated by conservative therapy, 30 % — attributed to grade III-IV, and to eliminate them were required additional invasive interventions and intensive care.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>уролитиаз</kwd><kwd>эндоскопическая хирургия</kwd><kwd>осложнения</kwd><kwd>систематизация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>urolithiasis</kwd><kwd>endoscopic surgery</kwd><kwd>complications</kwd><kwd>systematization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette JJ. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and its legasy. European Urology. 2005;47(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.009</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette JJ. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and its legasy. European Urology. 2005;47(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.009</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Martin RC, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature. Ann. Surg. 2002;235(6):803-13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Martin RC, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature. Ann. Surg. 2002;235(6):803-13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classifcation of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240:205-13. doi: 10.1097/01. sla.0000133083.54934.ae</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classifcation of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240:205-13. doi: 10.1097/01. sla.0000133083.54934.ae</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">GUIDELINES. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">GUIDELINES. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дж. Эдвард Морган–мл., Мэгид С. Михаил. Клиниче- ская анестезиология. С.-Петербург: «Невский диа- лект», 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">J. Edward Morgan jr., Megid S. Mikhail. Klinichеskaya anеstеziologiya. S. Pеtеrburg: Nevskii dialekt Press, 1999. (in Russ)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Акилов Ф.А., Гиясов Ш.И., Мухтаров Ш.Т., Насыров Ф.Р. Распределение камней верхних мочевых путей на категорию сложности с позиций применения эн- доскопического метода лечения. Эксперименталь- ная и клиническая урология. 2013;(4):98-102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akilov FA, Giyasov ShI, Mukhtarov ShT, Nasyrov FR. Distribution of the upper urinary tract stones by their complexity from the position of application of endoscopic technique of treatment. Jeksperimental’naja i klinicheskaja urologija. 2013;(4):98-102. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Trock BJ, Link RE, Sullivan W,Su LM. Classifcation and trends of postoperative morbidities following laparoscopic radical pros tatectomy. J Urol. 2005;24:88-93. doi: 10.1097/01. ju.0000161607.04334.26</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Trock BJ, Link RE, Sullivan W,Su LM. Classifcation and trends of postoperative morbidities following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;24:88-93. doi: 10.1097/01. ju.0000161607.04334.26</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kocak B, Koff ron AJ, Baker TB, Salvalaggio PR, Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, Abecassis MM, Stuart FP, Leventhal JR. Proposed classifcation of complications aŌ er live donor nephrectomy. Urology. 2006;67(5):927-31. doi: 10.1016/j. urology.2005.11.023</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kocak B, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, Salvalaggio PR, Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, Abecassis MM, Stuart FP, Leventhal JR. Proposed classification of complications after live donor nephrectomy. Urology. 2006;67(5):927-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.023</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Teber D, Tefekli A, Eskicorapci S, Rassweiler J. Retroperitoneoscopy: a versatile access for many urologic indications. Eur Urol Suppl. 2006;5:975. doi: 10.1016/j.eursup.2006.07.012</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teber D, Tefekli A, Eskicorapci S, Rassweiler J. Retroperitoneoscopy: a versatile access for many urologic indications. Eur Urol Suppl. 2006;5:975. doi: 10.1016/j.eursup.2006.07.012</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, Sarilar O, Muslumanoglu AY. Classifcation of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Complications Using the Modifed Clavien Grading System: Looking for a Standard. Еuropean urology. 2008;53(1):184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y, Baykal M, Sarilar O, Muslumanoglu AY. Classifcation of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Complications Using the Modifi ed Clavien Grading System: Looking for a Standard. Еuropean urology. 2008;53(1):184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classifi cation of surgical complications: fve-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/ SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/ SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, Wolf JS Jr, Grabe M, Gravas S; CROES PCNL Study Group. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:246-55. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.055</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, Wolf JS Jr, Grabe M, Gravas S; CROES PCNL Study Group. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:246-55. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.055</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maghsoudi R, Etemadian M, Kashi AH, Mehravaran K. Management of Colon Perforation During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: 12 Years of Experience in a Referral Center. J Endourol. 2017;31(10):1032-1036. doi: 10.1089/ end.2017.0379</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maghsoudi R, Etemadian M, Kashi AH, Mehravaran K. Management of Colon Perforation During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: 12 Years of Experience in a Referral Center. J Endourol. 2017;31(10):1032-1036. doi: 10.1089/ end.2017.0379</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Özveren B, Eren MT, Özveri H, Altuğ U, Şahin A. Bilateral same-session ureterorenoscopy: A feasible approach to treat pan-urinary stone disease. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(4):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Özveren B, Eren MT, Özveri H, Altuğ U, Şahin A. Bilateral same-session ureterorenoscopy: A feasible approach to treat pan-urinary stone disease. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(4):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Curry D, Srinivasan R, Kucheria R, Goyal A, Allen D, Goode A, Yu D, Ajayi L. Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Galdako-Modified Valdivia Position: A High-Volume Single Center Experience. J Endourol. 2017;31(10):1001- 1006. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0064</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Curry D, Srinivasan R, Kucheria R, Goyal A, Allen D, Goode A, Yu D, Ajayi L. Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Galdako-Modified Valdivia Position: A High-Volume Single Center Experience. J Endourol. 2017;31(10):1001- 1006. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0064</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rassweiler J, Gumpinger R, Muller KN, Holzermann F, Eisenberger F. Multimodal treatment (ESWL and endourology) of complicated renal stone disease. Eur Urol. 1986;12(5):294-304.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rassweiler J, Gumpinger R, Muller KN, Holzermann F, Eisenberger F. Multimodal treatment (ESWL and endourology) of complicated renal stone disease. Eur Urol. 1986;12(5):294-304.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rassweiler J, Kohrmann KU, Potempa D, Henkel TO, Junemann KP, Alken P. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi: Current status and future aspects. Min Invasive Ther. 1992;1(2):141-58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rassweiler J, Kohrmann KU, Potempa D, Henkel TO, Junemann KP, Alken P. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi: Current status and future aspects. Min Invasive Ther. 1992;1(2):141-58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Eisenberger F. Management of Complex renal stones. BJU Int. 2000;86:919-28.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Eisenberger F. Management of Complex renal stones. BJU Int. 2000;86:919-28.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Defnitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference CommiƩ ee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101 (6):1644- 55.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Defnitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992;101 (6):1644- 55.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Савельев В.С., Гельфанд Б.Р. Сепсис. Классификация, клинико-диагностическая концепция и лечение. 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Savelyev VS, Gelfand BR. Sepsis. Classifcation, clinicaldiagnostic concept and treatment. 2010. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Akilov FA, Giyasov ShI, Mukhtarov ShT, Nasirov FR, Alidjanov JF. Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo grading system for assessing the postoperative complications of endoscopic surgery for nephrolithiasis: a critical review. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2013.39(3):153-60. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.032</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akilov FA, Giyasov ShI, Mukhtarov ShT, Nasirov FR, Alidjanov JF. Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo grading system for assessing the postoperative complications of endoscopic surgery for nephrolithiasis: a crtical review. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2013.39(3):153-60. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.032</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
