<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">urovest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник урологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Urology Herald</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2308-6424</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Rostov State Medical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-4-5-12</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">urovest-173</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>АНАЛИЗ ПРИЧИН, ЧАСТОТЫ И ТЯЖЕСТИ ОСТРОГО ОСЛОЖНЁННОГО ПИЕЛОНЕФРИТА ПРИ ЭНДОСКОПИЧЕСКОЙ ХИРУРГИИ УРОЛИТИАЗА</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>ANALYSIS OF CAUSES, FREQUENCY AND SEVERITY OF ACUTE COMPLICATED PYELONEPHRITIS IN ENDOSCOPIC INTERVENTIONS FOR UROLITHIASIS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4434-5460</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Акилов</surname><given-names>Ф. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Akilov</surname><given-names>F. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>консультант в РСЦУ;</p><p>доктор медицинских наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой урологии,</p><p>Ташкент</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Consultant urologist of RSCU</p><p>Doctor of medicine, professor, head of Tashkent medical academy Urology department,</p><p>Tashkent</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">r.s.c.u@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-3443</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гиясов</surname><given-names>Ш. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Giyasov</surname><given-names>Sh. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>консультант в РСЦУ;</p><p>доктор медицинских наук, доцент, директор программы магистратуры кафедры урологии,</p><p>Ташкент</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Consultant urologist of RSCU;</p><p>Doctor of medicine, assistant professor, director of masters’ program,</p><p>Tashkent </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">dr.sh.giyasov@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>АО «Республиканский Специализированный Центр Урологии»; &#13;
Ташкентская медицинская академия</institution><country>Узбекистан</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Republican Specialized Center of Urology; &#13;
Tashkent Medical Academy</institution><country>Uzbekistan</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>12</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Акилов Ф.А., Гиясов Ш.И., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Акилов Ф.А., Гиясов Ш.И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Akilov F.A., Giyasov S.I.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/173">https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/173</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Несмотря на совершенствование эндоскопического оборудования и техники чрескожных и трансуретральных вмешательств, в лечении уролитиаза самым частым послеоперационным осложнением до сих пор остается острый осложненный пиелонефрит.</p></sec><sec><title>Цель исследования</title><p>Цель исследования. Объективная оценка частоты, причины и степени тяжести послеоперационного пиелонефрита при эндоскопической хирургии уролитиаза, с учетом необходимых дополнительных вмешательств для их устранения.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. Проведен анализ результатов 1027 эндоскопических операций (чрескожные и трануретральные), выполненных по поводу камней почек и верхних мочевых путей в Республиканском специализированном центре урологии (РСЦУ, Ташкент, Узбекистан). «Простые» камни были у 446 (43,4%) пациентов, «сложные» — у 581 (56,6%). Тяжесть течения послеоперационного пиелонефрита с необходимостью выполнения дополнительных вмешательств для его ликвидации оценена с помощью классиификации Clavien-Dindo.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Послеоперационный пиелонефрит развился у 115 (11,2%) больных. Согласно систематизации послеоперационных осложнений пациенты c пиелонефритом распределены следующим образом: I-0, II-95, IIIa-8, IIIb-10, IVa-2, IVb-0, V-0.</p></sec><sec><title>Выводы</title><p>Выводы. Больных с исходной инфекцией мочевых путей, осложнениями, возникающими в ходе эндоскопического удаления камней и в послеоперационном периоде необходимо рассматривать как «пациентов с абсолютным риском развития послеоперационных инфекционно-воспалительных осложнений». У 82,6% больных осложнённый пиелонефрит был ликвидирован консервативно, у 17,4% потребовались дополнительные инвазивные вмешательства и интенсивная терапия.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. Despite the improvement of endoscopic equipment and methods of percutaneous and transurethral interventions on urolithiasis, acute pyelonephritis remains one of the most frequent postoperative complications.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose of the study</title><p>Purpose of the study. Objective assessment of frequency, causes and severity of postoperative pyelonephritis in endoscopic surgery for urolithiasis, as well as additional interventions needed to manage this complication.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Materials and methods. The results of 1027 endoscopic operations (percutaneous and transurethral) performed in Republican Specialized Center of Urology (RSCU, Tashkent, Uzbekistan) for kidney and upper urinary tract stones were analyzed. «Simple» stones were in 446 (43.4%) patients, «complex» – in 581 (56.6%) ones. The severity of postoperative pyelonephritis were assessed using Clavien-Dindo grading system according to the necessity of additional interventions.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. Postoperative pyelonephritis developed in 115 (11.2%) patients. According to the systematization of postoperative complications patients with pyelonephritis were distributed as follows: I-0, II-95, IIIa-8, IIIb10, IVa-2, IVb-0, V-0.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Conclusions. Patients with initial urinary tract infection (UTI) and complications arising during endoscopic interventions and in postoperative period should be considered as «patients with absolute risk of postoperative infectious and inflammatory complications development». Complicated pyelonephritis was eradicated conservatively in 82.6% of patients, additional invasive interventions and intensive therapy were required in 17.4% of patients.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>инфекция</kwd><kwd>пиелонефрит</kwd><kwd>уролитиаз</kwd><kwd>эндоскопическая хирургия</kwd><kwd>осложнения</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>infection</kwd><kwd>pyelonephritis</kwd><kwd>urolithiasis</kwd><kwd>endoscopic surgery</kwd><kwd>complications</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khudaybergenov UA, Akilov FA, Makhmudov AT, Tukhtamishev MK. Studying of prevalence of the most significant urological diseases in the Aral Sea Area. European Science Review. 2017;1(2):140-144. doi: 10.20534/ ESR-17-1.2-140-144</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khudaybergenov UA, Akilov FA, Makhmudov AT, Tukhtamishev MK. Studying of prevalence of the most significant urological diseases in the Aral Sea Area. European Science Review. 2017;1(2):140-144. doi:10.20534/ ESR-17-1.2-140-144</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette JJ. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and its legasy. European Urology. 2005;47(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.009</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la RoseƩ e JJ. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and its legasy. European Urology. 2005;47(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.009</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лопаткин Н.А., Трапезникова М.Ф., Дутов В.В., Дзеранов Н.К. Дистанционная ударно-волновая литотрипсия: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Урология. 2007;6:3-12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lopatkin NA, Trapеznikova MF, Dutov VV, Dzеranov NK. ESWL: past, present and future. Urologiia. 2007; 6:3-12. (in Russ).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трапезникова М.Ф., Дутов В.В., Уренков С.Б., Румянцев А.А., Иванов А.Е., Подойницын А.А., Русанова Е.В., Попов Д.М. Чрескожная нефролитотрипсия у больных пожилого и старческого возраста. Урология. 2011;3:36-39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trapeznikova MF, Dutov VV, Urenkov SB, Rumyantsev AA, Ivanov AE, Podoinitsyn AA, Rusanova EV, Popov DM. Transcutaneous nephrolithotripsy in presenile and senile patients Urologiia. 2011;3:36-39. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nouralizadeh A, Lashay A, Ziaee SA, Ahanian A, Sharifi SH, Nikkar MM, Ojand A, Soltani MH. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in high-risk patients: a single-center experience with more than 350 cases. Urologia Internationalis. 2013;90(4):394-398. doi: 10.1159/000347032</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nouralizadeh A, Lashay A, Ziaee SA, Ahanian A, Sharifi SH, Nikkar MM, Ojand A, Soltani MH. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in high-risk patients: a single-center experience with more than 350 cases. Urologia Internationalis. 2013;90(4):394-398. doi: 10.1159/000347032</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ахмедов Р.Н., Халилов М.Л., Мухтаров Ш.Т., Рашидов М.М., Гиясов Ш.И. Перкутанная нефростомия как метод выбора на этапе лечения больных мочекаменной болезнью, осложненной бактериемическим шоком. Инфекция, иммунитет и фармакология. 2010;5:4-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ahmеdov RN, Halilov ML, Muhtarov ShT., Rashidov MM, Giyasov ShI. Percutaneous nephrostomy as a method of choice during the treatment of patients with urolithiasis complicated by bacteremiс shock. Infеktsiya, immunitеt i farmakologiya. 2010;5:4-6. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dogan HS, Guliyev F, Cetinkaya YS, Sofi kerim M, Ozden E, Sahin A. Importance of microbiological evaluation in management of infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2007;38(3):737-742. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9147-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dogan HS, Guliyev F, Cetinkaya YS, Sofi kerim M, Ozden E, Sahin A. Importance of microbiological evaluation in management of infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2007;38(3):737-742. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9147-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mariappan P, Smith G, Bariol. SV Moussa SA, Tolley DA. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitive are better then bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. Journal of Urology (Baltimore). 2005;173(5):1610-1614. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154350.78826.96</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mariappan P, Smith G, Bariol. SV, Moussa SA, Tolley DA. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitive are beƩ er then bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. Journal of Urology (Baltimore). 2005;173(5):1610- 1614. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154350.78826.96</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ritter M, Krombach P, Michel MS. Percutaneous Stone Removal. European Urology Supplements. 2011;10(5):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.eursup.2011.07.005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ritter M, Krombach P, Michel MS. Percutaneous Stone Removal. European Urology Supplements. 2011;10(5):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.eursup.2011.07.005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xue W, Pacik D, Boellaard W, Breda A, Botoca M, Rassweiler J, Van Cleynenbreugel B, de la Rosette J. Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.113</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xue W, Pacik D, Boellaard W, Breda A, Botoca M, Rassweiler J, Van Cleynenbreugel B, de la Rosette J. Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1293- 7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.113</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, Cormio L, Zhang X, Louie M, Grabe M. The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol. 2011;25(8):1275-80. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0067</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, Cormio L, Zhang X, Louie M, Grabe M. The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol. 2011;25(8):1275-80. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0067</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kadlec AO, Greco KA, Fridirici ZC, Hart ST, Vellos TG., Turk TM. Comparison of complication rates for unilateral and bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using a modified Clavien grading system. BJU International. 2013;111(4 Pt B):E243-248. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11589.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kadlec AO, Greco KA, Fridirici ZC, Hart ST, Vellos TG, Turk TM. Comparison of complication rates for unilateral and bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using a modified Clavien grading system. BJU International. 2013;111(4 Pt B):E243-248. doi: 10.1111/j.1464- 410X.2012.11589.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Акилов Ф.А., Гиясов Ш.И. Частота, причины и тяжесть острого осложненного пиелоенфрита при эндоскопической хирургии уролитиаза. Здоровье Узбекистана. 2016;9(11):72-75.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akilov FA, Giyasov ShI. Rate, reasons and severity of acute complicated pyelonephritis secondary to endoscopic procedures on urolithiasis. Zdorov’е Uzbеkistana. 2016;9(11):72-75. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гиясов Ш.И. Осложнения эндоскопической хирургии нефролитиаза: причины, классификация, тактика, прогноз. Автореф. … докт. мед. наук. Ташкент; 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Giyasov ShI. Complications of endoscopic surgery of nephrolithiasis: causes, classification, strategy, prognosis. AŌ oref. diss. dokt. mеd. nauk. Tashkent Tashkent; 2015. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240:205-213. doi: 10.1097/01. sla.0000133083.54934.ae</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery. 2004;240:205-213. doi: 10.1097/01. sla.0000133083.54934.ae</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A, Thomas K. Guidelines: Urolithiasis. Arnhem: European Association of Urology; 2016. Available at: http:// uroweb.org/guideurolithiasis/line/ Accessed September 21, 2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A, Thomas K. Guidelines: Urolithiasis. Arnhem: European Association of Urology; 2016. Available at: hƩ p:// uroweb.org/guideurolithiasis/line/ Accessed September 21, 2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дж. Эдвард Морган–мл., Мэгид С. Михаил. Клиническая анестезиология. С.-Петербург: «Невский диалект»; 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">J. Edward Morgan jr., Megid S. Mikhail. Klinichеskaya anеstеziologiya. S. Pеtеrburg: Nevskii dialekt Press; 1999. (in Russ).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Akilov FA, Giyasov ShI. Mukhtarov ShT, Nasirov FR Alidjanov JF. Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo grading system for assessing the postoperative complications of endoscopic surgery for nephrolithiasis: a critical review. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2013.39(3):153-60. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.032</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akilov FA, Giyasov ShI., Mukhtarov ShT., Nasirov FR. Alidjanov J.F. Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo grading system for assessing the postoperative complications of endoscopic surgery for nephrolithiasis: a critical review. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2013.39(3):153-60. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.032</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
