<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">urovest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник урологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Urology Herald</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2308-6424</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Rostov State Medical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-1-32-36</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">urovest-122</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ И БЕЗОПАСНОСТЬ МИНИ-ПЕРКУТАННОЙ НЕФРОЛИТОТРИПСИИ В ЛЕЧЕНИИ КРУПНЫХ И КОРАЛЛОВИДНЫХ КАМНЕЙ ПОЧЕК</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTRIPSY IN THE TREATMENT OF LARGE AND STAGHORN STONES OF THE KIDNEY</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Трусов</surname><given-names>П. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Trusov</surname><given-names>P. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><email xlink:type="simple">rosturology@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коган</surname><given-names>М. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kogan</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><email xlink:type="simple">dept_kogan@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хван</surname><given-names>В. К.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khvan</surname><given-names>V. K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><email xlink:type="simple">dfhwang@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Ростовский олбластной консультативно-диагностический центр</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Rostov Regional Consultative-and-Diagnostic Center</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Ростовский государственный медицинский университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Rostov State Medical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>32</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Трусов П.В., Коган М.И., Хван В.К., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Трусов П.В., Коган М.И., Хван В.К.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Trusov P.V., Kogan M.I., Khvan V.K.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/122">https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/122</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. К наиболее тяжелым формам мочекаменной болезни относят крупные (&gt;2 см) и коралловидные камни почек. Согласно рекомендациям Американской и Европейской ассоциаций урологов, перкутанная нефролитотрипсия является первой линией в лечении крупных камней почек. Однако в современной литературе приводятся данные о высокой частоте осложнений после перкутанной нефролитотрипсии, наиболее тяжелым из которых является почечное кровотечение. Кроме того, описаны различные методики лечения с применением нефроскопов малых диаметров с целью добиться приемлемой высокой эффективности, но при меньшем количестве осложнений. С учетом вышеизложенного, актуальным представляется проведение собственного исследования с применением мини-перкутанной нефролитотрипсии у пациентов с крупными и коралловидными камнями почек.</p></sec><sec><title>Цель исследования</title><p>Цель исследования. Оценка эффективности и безопасности мини-перкутанной нефролитотрипсии в лечении крупных и коралловидных камней почек.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. С февраля 2014 по январь 2015 гг. одним хирургом ГАУ РО «Областной консультативно-диагностический центр» (Ростов-на-Дону, Россия) выполнены 32 мини-перкутанной нефролитотрипсии у пациентов с крупными и коралловидными камнями почек. За критерии эффективности операции принимали полное удаление камней или наличие резидуальных конкрементов размером &lt;3 мм. Послеоперационные осложнения оценивали по модифицированной классификации Clavien.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Возраст больных - от 25 до 67 лет (62,5% - женщины). Средний размер камня - 32,4 (21-62) мм. Средняя продолжительность операции - 67,5 (20-200) мин. В 87,5 % случаев достигнута полная элиминация конкрементов. Частота осложнений составила 9,4%. Подтекание мочи (Clavien ЗЬ) через почечно-кожный свищ имело место у одного (3,1%) больного, у двух (6,3%) пациентов наблюдали инфекцию мочевых путей (Clavien 2).</p></sec><sec><title>Выводы</title><p>Выводы. Мини-перкутанная нефролитотрипсия является высокоэффективной и безопасной методикой лечения пациентов с крупными и коралловидными камнями почек. К преимуществам данной лечебной методики относится минимальная частота осложнений и отсутствие клинически значимой кровопотери.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. Large (&gt;2 cm) and Staghorn kidney stones are severe forms of: nephrolithiasis. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is first line in treatment of large kidney stones, according to the recommendations of the American and European associations of urology. In the modern literature is the high frequency of complications after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, renal bleeding is the most serious of which. Many different methods of treatment with application of nephroscope small diameters in order to achieve acceptable high performance, but with fewer complications.</p></sec><sec><title>Objective</title><p>Objective. We used a mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large and Staghorn kidney stones.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Materials and methods. From February 2014 to January 2015, one surgeon of our center made 32 mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in patients with large and Staghorn kidney stones. Criteria of effective treatment was the complete removal of stones or the presence of residual calculus size &lt;3 mm. Postoperative complications were evaluated according to modified Clavien classification.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. Age ranged from 25 to 67 years. Women was 62.5 percent. The average stone size was 32.4 (21- 62) mm. The average time of surgery was 67.5 (20-200) min. Stone free was 87.5 %. The complication rate was 9.4%. 3.1% - leakage of urine (Clavien 3b), 6.3% - urinary tract infection (Clavien 2).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an effective and safe treatment of patients with large and Staghorn kidney stones. It has a minimal complication rate and there is not much blood loss.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>нефролитиаз</kwd><kwd>крупные камни почек</kwd><kwd>коралловидные камни почек</kwd><kwd>мини-перкутанная нефролитотрипсия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>nephrolithiasis</kwd><kwd>large kidney stone</kwd><kwd>staghorn kidney stones</kwd><kwd>mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мартов А.Г., Дутов С.В., Андронов А.С. Ультраминиперкутанная нефролитотрипсия в лечении камней почек. Урология. 2016;2:82-88.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Martov AG, DutovSV, Andronov AS. Ultraminipercutaneous nephrolithotripsy in treating kidney stones Urology. 2016;2:82-88. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Меринов Д.С., Павлов Д.А., Фатихов P.P., Епишов В.А., Гурбанов Ш.Ш., Артемов А.В. Минимально-инвазивная перкутанная нефролитотрипсия: деликатный и эффективный инструмент в лечении крупных камней почек. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2013;3:94-98.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Merinov DS, Pavlov DA, Fatihov RR, Epishov VA, Gurbanov. ShSh, Artemov AV. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: delicate and effective tool in the treatment of large kidney stones. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2013;3:94-98. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рогачиков В.В., Нестеров С.Н., Ильченко Д.Н., Тевлин К.П., Кудряшов А.В. Перкутанная нефролитолапаксия: прошлое, настоящее, будущее... Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2016;2:58-66.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rogachikov VV, Nesterov SN, Il'chenko DN, Tevlin KP, Kudryashov AV. Percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: past, present, future... Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2016;2:58-66. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Яненко Э.К., Меринов Д.С., Константинова О.В., Епишов В.А., Калиниченко Д.Н. Современные тенденции в эпидемиологии, диагностике и лечении мочекаменной болезни. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2012; 3:19-24.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yanenko EK, Merinov DS, Konstantinova OV, Epishov VA, Kalinichenko DN. Modern trends in epidemiology, diagnostic and treatment of urolithiasis. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2012; 3:19-24. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abdelhafez MF, Bedke J, Amend В, EIGanainy E, Aboulella H et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy as an effective and safe procedure for large renal stones. BJU Int. 2012;110:1022-1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11191.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abdelhafez MF, BedkeJ, Amend B, EIGanainy E, Aboulella H et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy as an effective and safe procedure for large renal stones. BJU Int. 2012;110:1022-1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11191.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tepeler A, Ba§ibuyuk I, Tosun M, Armagan A. The role of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of kidney stones. TurkJ Urol. 2016;42(4): 261- 266. doi: 10.5152/tud.2016.32644</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tepeler A, Ba§ibuyuk I, Tosun M, Armagan A. The role of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of kidney stones. TurkJ Urol. 2016;42(4): 261-266. doi: 10.5152/tud.2016.32644</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 1997;157:1578-82.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 1997;157:1578-82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">De la Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P, Elsakka AM, Zudaire JJ et al. Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol. 2008;180:2489-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.025</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">De la Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P, Elsakka AM, Zudaire JJ et al. Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol. 2008;180:2489-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.025</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 2016;67:125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.046</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 2016;67:125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.046</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guohua Z, Wen Z, Xun L, Wenzhong C, Yongzhong H et al. The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17(4):307-310. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31806e61f4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guohua Z, Wen Z, Xun L, Wenzhong C, Yongzhong H et al. The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17(4):307-310. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31806e61f4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa ТЕ. The Hickman peel away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 1997;11:171-2. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.171</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa ТЕ. The Hickman peel away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 1997;11:171-2. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.171</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol. 2004;18:715-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.715</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol. 2004;18:715-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.715</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Gotz T. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol. 2001;40:619-624.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Gotz T. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. EurUrol. 2001;40:619-624.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:899-906. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.020</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:899-906. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.020</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). Urologe A. 2008;47(1066):8-73. doi: 10.1007/s00120-008-1814-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). UrologeA. 2008;47(1066):8-73. doi: 10.1007/s00120-008-1814-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173:1991-2000. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161171.67806.2a</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173:1991-2000. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161171.67806.2a</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sakr A, Salem E, Kamel M, Desoky E, Ragab A et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience. Urolithiasis. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0966-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">SakrA,Salem E, Kamel M, Desoky E, RagabAetal. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience. Urolithiasis. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0966-l</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skolarikos A, de la Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:229-34. doi: 10.1097/M0ll.0b013e3282f46afc</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skolarikos A, de la Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:229-34. doi: 10.1097/M0ll.0b013e3282f46afc</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol. 2008;53:184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, Sari E, Berberoglu Y et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol. 2008;53:184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Association of Urology; 2015. pp. 1-71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Association of Urology; 2015. pp. 1-71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zanetti S, Boeri L, Gallioli A, Talso M, Montanari E. Minimally invasive PCNL-MIP. Arch Esp Urol. 2017;70(l):226-234.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ZanettiS, Boeri L, Gallioli A,Talso M, Montanari E. Minimally invasive PCNL-MIP. Arch Esp Urol. 2017;70(l):226-234.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhou X, Gao X, Wen J, Xiao C. Clinical value of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position under the guidance of real-time ultrasound: report of 92 cases. Urol Res. 2008;36(2):111-114. doi: 10.1007/s00240-008-0134-8</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhou X, Gao X, Wen J, Xiao C. Clinical value of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position under the guidance of real-time ultrasound: report of 92 cases. Urol Res. 2008;36(2):111-114. doi: 10.1007/S00240-008-0134-8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
