<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">urovest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник урологии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Urology Herald</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2308-6424</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Rostov State Medical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-2-22-30</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">urovest-1051</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Субуретральная синтетическая петля с контролем натяжения по сравнению со стандартной петлёй при лечении стрессового недержания мочи у женщин: предварительные краткосрочные результаты</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Tension-controlled suburethral synthetic sling versus standard sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: preliminary short-term results</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-2217</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Касян</surname><given-names>Г. Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kasyan</surname><given-names>G. R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Геворг Рудикович Касян — д-р мед. наук, профессор </p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Gevorg R. Kasyan — Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof. </p><p>Moscow </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">gkasyan@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1001-9798</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алиев</surname><given-names>О. Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Aliev</surname><given-names>O. R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Олег Русланович Алиев </p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Oleg R. Aliev </p><p>Moscow </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">oleg90/97@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6096-5723</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пушкарь</surname><given-names>Д. Ю.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pushkar</surname><given-names>D. Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Дмитрий Юрьевич Пушкарь — д-р мед. наук, профессор, академик РАН </p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dmitriy Yu. Pushkar — Dr.Sc.(Med), Full Prof.; Acad. of the RAS </p><p>Moscow </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">pushkardm@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российский университет медицины ; Городская клиническая больница им. С. П. Боткина</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Russian University of Medicine ; Moscow Urology Centre — Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>06</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>22</fpage><lpage>30</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Касян Г.Р., Алиев О.Р., Пушкарь Д.Ю., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Касян Г.Р., Алиев О.Р., Пушкарь Д.Ю.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kasyan G.R., Aliev O.R., Pushkar D.Y.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1051">https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1051</self-uri><abstract><p>Введение. Операции c использованием синтетических субуретральных петель успешно используются для лечения недержания мочи у женщин на протяжении нескольких десятилетий. Наряду с высокой эффективностью имеются нерешённые проблемы, связанные c высокой частотой рецидивирования недержания мочи и вновь возникающими симптомами нижних мочевыводящих путей, связанных с ятрогенной инфравезикальной обструкцией. Стандартизация степени натяжения петли может быть ключом для дальнейшего улучшения результатов лечения пациенток c недержанием мочи.Цель исследования. Сравнить результаты оперативного лечения стрессового недержания мочи с использованием синтетической петли с контролем натяжения со стандартной субуретральной петлевой пластикой.Материалы и методы. Нами проведено рандомизированное исследование оценки эффективности оперативного лечения с применением синтетических петель с контролем натяжения (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04101279). Средняя часть петли имеет абсорбируемый демпферный слой, который соприкасается со средней третью уретры, тем самым обеспечивая стандартное натяжение петли. Посредством блоковой рандомизации пациентки были включены в группу исследования и перенесли операцию с использованием субуретральной петли с устройством контроля натяжения. В контрольной группе применялась операция с использованием синтетической петли Урослинг (Lintex ®). Все пациентки прошли стандартное обследование перед госпитализацией и после оперативного лечения, включая осмотр в кресле. Этапы функциональной оценки состояния пациенток включали оценку по опросникам UDI-6 и IIQ-7, до операции и после лечения через 1 и 3 месяцев, а также проведение уродинамического исследования до и после операции.Результаты. В общей сложности 280 пациенток прошли скрининг и подписали информированное согласие для участия в исследовании. Были включены 253 пациентки, рандомизированные в две группы: группа 1 (исследуемая) включала 123 пациентки, а группа 2 (контрольная) — 130 пациенток. Средний возраст участниц исследования в исследуемой группе составил 55,2 ± 10,9 лет, средний ИМТ — 25,60 ± 2,55, и средняя продолжительность недержания мочи — 4,47 ± 3,79 лет. По данным опросников (UDI-6, IIQ-7), через 1 месяц улучшение показателей было статистически значимым по сравнению с дооперационными значениями, но межгрупповой анализ через 1 и 3 месяца не определил существенной разницы. По результатам комплексного уродинамического исследования через 3 месяца после лечения в исследуемой группе рецидив стрессового недержания мочи был отмечен у 6,6% пациенток, в то время как в группе контроля — у 8,0%. Императивное недержание мочи, возникшее впервые, отмечено у 4,9% пациенток в основной группе и у 10,0% — в контрольной.Заключение. Субуретральная синтетическая петля с контролем натяжения по сравнению с традиционной стандартной петлёй при лечении стрессового недержания мочи у женщин имеет преимущества в части снижения частоты инфравезикальной обструкции, протрузий протеза, частоты вновь возникших симптомов нижних мочевыводящих путей. Это достигается путём стандартизации этапа имплантации петли и предотвращения чрезмерного или же недостаточного натяжения импланта. Методика может быть использована в каждодневной урологической практике.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. Suburethral sling surgery has been successfully used for the treatment of female urinary incontinence (UI) for several decades. In addition to high efficacy, there are unresolved problems associated with the high recurrence rate of UI and re-emerging lower urinary tract symptoms associated with iatrogenic infravesical obstruction. Tension standardisation may be the key to further improving the outcomes of UI-patients.Objective. To compare the results of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) using a tension-controlled synthetic sling with standard suburethral sling surgery. Materials &amp; methods. We conducted a randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of surgery with tension-controlled synthetic loops (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04101279). The middle portion of the loop has an absorbable damping layer that contacts the urethral mid-third, thereby providing standardised loop tension. Through block randomisation, patients were included in the study group and underwent surgery using a suburethral loop with a tension control device. The control group underwent surgery using a synthetic Urosling loop (Lintex®). All patients underwent standard examination before hospitalisation and after surgical treatment, including chairside examination. The stages of functional assessment of the patients' condition included assessment by the UDI-6 and IIQ-7 questionnaires, preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 and 3 months, as well as urodynamic examination before and after surgery.Results. Overall, 280 patients were screened and signed informed consent to participate in the study. We enrolled 253 patients randomised into two groups: group 1 (study group) included 123 patients and group 2 (control group) included 130 patients. The mean age of the study participants in the study group was 55.2 ± 10.9 years, the mean BMI was 25.60 ± 2.55, and the mean length of urinary incontinence was 4.47 ± 3.79 years. According to the questionnaires (UDI-6, IIQ-7) after one month, the improvement of indicators was significant improvement in symptoms in both groups, while group to group comparison showed no difference. Based on urodynamic study three months after treatment, recurrence of SUI was noted in 6.6% of patients in the study group, while in the control group in 8.0%. Urge UI occurred de novo was noted in 4.9% of patients in the main group vs in 10.0% in the control group.Conclusion. The tension-controlled synthetic suburethral loop has advantages over the traditional standard loop in the treatment of female SUI regarding the reduction of the incidence of infravesical obstruction, prosthesis protrusion, and the incidence of recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms. This is achieved by standardising the sling implantation step and preventing excessive or insufficient loop tensioning. This technique can be used in day-to-day urological practice.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>недержание мочи</kwd><kwd>контроль натяжения</kwd><kwd>оперативное лечение</kwd><kwd>субуретральный слинг</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>urinary incontinence</kwd><kwd>tension control</kwd><kwd>treatment</kwd><kwd>surgery</kwd><kwd>suburethral sling</kwd><kwd>loop</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено при поддержке АНО «Московский центр инновационных технологий в здравоохранении».</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The study was supported by the Autonomous Nonprofit Organization ‘Moscow Centre for Innovative Technologies in Healthcare’.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1592-1604. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.12137</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1592-1604. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.12137</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(6):1713-1720; discussion 1720-1723. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70346-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">,. DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(6):1713-1720; discussion 1720-1723. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70346-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim A, Kim S, Kim HG. Current Overview of Surgical Options for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence. Int Neurourol J. 2020;24(3):222-230. DOI: 10.5213/inj.2040052.026</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim A, Kim S, Kim HG. Current Overview of Surgical Options for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence. Int Neurourol J. 2020;24(3):222-230. DOI: 10.5213/inj.2040052.026</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ulmsten U. The basic understanding and clinical results of tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Urologe A. 2001;40(4):269-273. DOI: 10.1007/s001200170035</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ulmsten U. The basic understanding and clinical results of tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Urologe A. 2001;40(4):269-273. DOI: 10.1007/s001200170035</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shah HN, Badlani GH. Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review. Indian J Urol. 2012;28(2):129-153. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.98453</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shah HN, Badlani GH. Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review. Indian J Urol. 2012;28(2):129-153. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.98453</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kokanali MK, Doğanay M, Aksakal O, Cavkaytar S, Topçu HO, Özer İ. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;177:146-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.039</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kokanali MK, Doğanay M, Aksakal O, Cavkaytar S, Topçu HO, Özer İ. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;177:146-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.039</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ковалев Г.В., Шкарупа Д.Д., Кубин Н.Д., Ничипорук Г.И., Гайворонский И.В. Анатомические предпосылки вариативности результатов трансобтураторного среднеуретрального слинга. Вестник урологии. 2021;9(2):64-73. DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-2-64-73</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kovalev G.V., Shkarupa D.D., Kubin N.D., Nichiporuk G.I., Gaivoronsky I.V. Anatomical premises for the variability of the results of transobturator mid-urethral sling. Urology Herald. 2021;9(2):64-73. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-2-64-73</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Flochlay M, Bey E, Bruneaux E, Mazancourt ES, Wagner L. Traitement de l’incontinence urinaire d’effort féminine avec insuffisance sphincté- rienne récidivée ou non : la bandelette rétropubienne ajustable Remeex [Treatment of female recurrent or not stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: Sub-urethral retropubic adjustable sling (Remeex)]. Prog Urol. 2022;32(2):101-107. (In French). DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2021.11.002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Flochlay M, Bey E, Bruneaux E, Mazancourt ES, Wagner L. Traitement de l’incontinence urinaire d’effort féminine avec insuffisance sphincté- rienne récidivée ou non : la bandelette rétropubienne ajustable Remeex [Treatment of female recurrent or not stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: Sub-urethral retropubic adjustable sling (Remeex)]. Prog Urol. 2022;32(2):101-107. (In French). DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2021.11.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kubin N, Shakhaliev R, Labetov I, Kovalev G, Shulgin A, Nuriev A, Shkarupa D. Tunable tension tape versus transobturator tape in treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: Randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(2):311-319. DOI: 10.1002/nau.25351</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kubin N, Shakhaliev R, Labetov I, Kovalev G, Shulgin A, Nuriev A, Shkarupa D. Tunable tension tape versus transobturator tape in treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: Randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(2):311-319. DOI: 10.1002/nau.25351</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grigoryan B, Shadyan G, Kasyan G, Pushkar D. Adjustable slings versus other surgical methods in female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(7):1351-1367. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05535-z</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grigoryan B, Shadyan G, Kasyan G, Pushkar D. Adjustable slings versus other surgical methods in female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(7):1351-1367. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05535-z</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rudnicki M, von Bothmer-Ostling K, Holstad A, Magnusson C, Majida M, Merkel C, Prien J, Jakobsson U, Teleman P. Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(11):1347-1356. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13205</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rudnicki M, von Bothmer-Ostling K, Holstad A, Magnusson C, Majida M, Merkel C, Prien J, Jakobsson U, Teleman P. Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(11):1347-1356. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13205</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sukhikh S, Kasyan G, Grigoryan B, Pushkar D. Suburethral Synthetic Adjustment-controlled Tape Compared with Conventional Treatment for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1441-1447. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.12.017</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sukhikh S, Kasyan G, Grigoryan B, Pushkar D. Suburethral Synthetic Adjustment-controlled Tape Compared with Conventional Treatment for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1441-1447. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.12.017</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Касян Г.Р., Сухих С.О., Куприянов Ю.А., Строганов Р.В., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Отдаленные результаты применения субуретральной петлевой пластики с контролем натяжения в лечении недержания мочи. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2023;16(2):160-164. DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-2-160-164</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kasyan G.R., Sukhikh S.O., Kupriyanov Yu.A., Stroganov R.V., Pushkar D. Yu. Long-term results of the use of suburethral loop plastic surgery with tension control in the treatment of urinary incontinence. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2023;16(2):160-164. (In Russian). DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-2-160-164</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD006375. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD006375. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
